Thermodynamic and Kinetic Investigation on Electrogeneration of Hydroxyl Radicals for Water Purification

Guoshuai Liu,Yina Tian,Hua Zou,Nanqi Ren,Shijie You
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.2c00318
IF: 7.1
2023-01-01
ACS ES&T Engineering
Abstract:The water oxidation reaction (WOR) is of fundamental importance for the development of promising technologies in the field of energy conversion and environmental remediation. Although effort has been devoted to uncovering the mechanism of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) by four-electron WOR, little attention has been paid to an in-depth understanding of one-electron WOR for (OH)-O-center dot formation, which is the key to the electrochemical advanced oxidation process (EAOP) for environmental applications. Currently, oxygen evolution potential (OEP) is generally regarded as an important thermodynamic descriptor responsible for (OH)-O-center dot production, but the kinetic descriptor has been overlooked; thus, the trade-off between thermodynamic and kinetic factors remains unclear. In this study, the thermodynamic feasibility and kinetic activity of electrogeneration of (OH)-O-center dot were regulated by doping three kinds of lowelectronegativity elements (Ce, Al, and In) into the prototype PbO2 nonactive anode. We investigated these electrodes in terms of (OH)-O-center dot production and electrochemical decontamination performance in the context of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) removal. The results showed that 0.8%Ce-PbO2 anode (OEP = 3.67 V vs Ag/AgCl) achieved the highest SMX removal performance (similar to 100%; kobs = 0.027 min(-1)) and the highest (OH)-O-center dot production with a relatively high number of (OH)-O-center dot = 2.7 X 10(7). In comparison, the highest OEP (5.98 V vs Ag/AgCl) for the 1.6%CePbO2 anode exhibited the lowest SMX removal (similar to 59%; kobs = 0.008 min(-1)) and 1 order of magnitude lower (OH)-O-center dot production (relative number of (OH)-O-center dot = 1.5 X 10(6)). This suggested that the electrogeneration of (OH)-O-center dot was unlikely to be always positively correlated to the OEP of the anode. Both experimental results and theoretical calculations verified the importance of suitably high OEP and relative fast electron transfer rate toward WOR to generate H2O+ (oxidation intermediate of H2O) for the ideal anode of EAOP. This study not only demonstrates the trade-off existing between thermodynamic (OEP) and kinetic (charge/electron transfer) factors responsible for electrogeneration of (OH)-O-center dot via WOR fundamentally but also suggests a possible strategy for developing a high-efficiency anode by doping low-electronegativity elements to optimize one-electron WOR for environmental applications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?