Influence of wall thickness on the rupture risk of a patient-specific cerebral aneurysm: A fluid–structure interaction study
Chanikya Valeti,Srinivas Bolem,Azhaganmaadevi K. Alagan,B. J. Sudhir,Santhosh K. Kannath,Bhushan Akhade,Gowtham Matham,K Krishnakumar,B. S. V. Patnaik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0219980
IF: 4.6
2024-09-01
Physics of Fluids
Abstract:Cerebral aneurysms are the bulges in arteries that have the potential to rupture, as thin-walled regions of an aneurysm are more vulnerable. Understanding the correlation between the wall thickness and the corresponding wall stresses can facilitate better prediction using fluid–structure interaction tools. However, obtaining the actual in vivo wall thickness variation of the aneurysm dome and neck is vital for an accurate prediction of wall stresses. Invasive methods of obtaining wall thickness variation of an abnormal artery may further aggravate the rupture risk of these aneurysms. Modeling aneurysmal wall thickness reconstruction, closer to the in vivo conditions from the histopathological slices, is an apt approach to follow. To this end, the present study performs a comparative assessment of uniform, variable, and patient-specific wall thickness on the hemodynamic and biomechanical wall stresses. Simulations show that maximum wall stresses for the uniform, variable, and patient-specific wall thickness are 13.6, 27.6, and 48.4 kPa, respectively. The maximum wall displacements for the uniform, variable, and patient-specific wall thickness were observed to be 58.5, 126, and 162 μm, respectively. It is observed that the uniform wall thickness model is conservative and underestimates the risk in the prediction of biomechanical stresses and wall displacements. Thinner wall regions experience higher stress for the same internal pressure than thicker wall regions, indicating regions that are more susceptible to rupture. The generation of a variable wall thickness model was observed to be an apt approach, as patient-specific wall thickness information can only be retrospective in the current scientific scenario.
mechanics,physics, fluids & plasmas