Comparative Analysis of Cryogenic Distillation and Chemical Absorption for Carbon Capture in Integrated Natural Gas Liquefaction Processes

Ting He,Zhongxuan Liu,Heechang Son,Truls Gundersen,Wensheng Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135264
IF: 11.1
2023-01-01
Journal of Cleaner Production
Abstract:Compared with the widely used chemical absorption, cryogenic distillation has a lower thermal energy con-sumption and smaller footprint of the carbon capture unit. However, the power consumption of cryogenic distillation is higher. This study aims to use the azeotropic properties of ethane-CO2 mixtures to achieve CO2 capture by cryogenic distillation for cleaner LNG production. A single mixed refrigerant LNG process integrated with cryogenic distillation (CD-LNG) or chemical absorption (CA-LNG) is proposed. These technologies are comprehensively compared with respect to energy, economy and environment. The results show that when the feed gas contains 1.8-17 mol% CO2, the power consumption of the CA-LNG process is 0.37-0.40 kWh/Nm3 NG with an exergy destruction of 0.20-0.23 kWh/Nm3 NG. The power consumption of the CD-LNG process is 0.41-0.42 kWh/Nm3 NG with an exergy destruction of 0.18-0.22 kWh/Nm3 NG. Due to the much higher heat load for chemical solvent regeneration, the overall exergy efficiency of the CA-LNG process (49.0-53.8%) is lower than that of the CD-LNG process (50.6-56.0%). In addition, the total annualized cost (TAC) in a 20-years lifespan of the CD-LNG and the CA-LNG for a case study with a process scale of 179,800 t/a and a specified feed gas composition (79 mol% CH4, 10 mol% C2H6 and 11 mol% CO2) are 8,441,117 $ and 9,860,792 $ respectively. The GWP analysis shows that the CO2-eq of the CA-LNG process is 37-67% higher than that of the CD-LNG process.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?