Abstract:Background: Occupational segregation by gender is one of the major problems faced by professional women in the labor market. Since the sixties, psychological explanations point out that gender stereotypes are responsible for this persistent inequality in the workforce. Nevertheless, most of research has overlooked that emotions are particularly important as the discrimination faced by professional women is better explained by the ambivalent feelings they provoke than by stereotyping. Aim: The aim of this research is to analyse from the Stereotype Content Model (SCM, Fiske et al., 2002) and the Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes (BIAS) Map (Cuddy et al., 2007) whether cognitive, affective and behavioral components of prejudice act jointly to explain gender segregation in the labor market. Method: 1098 Spanish workers (59% women) from different occupational sectors were requested to rate how professional men and women in high (leaders) and low status (secretaries) positions who work in male (high-tech company) and female-dominated (health company) occupations are perceived (stereotypes), as well as the affective responses and the behavioral tendencies that they arouse. Data analyses: Two analyses of variance (a) and two ANOVAs with repeated measures (b) were carried out to analyze the effect of occupational status (high vs. low), type of company (high-tech vs. health) and workers' sex (men vs. women) on: (a) the social structural variables (status and competition), (b) on the stereotyped dimensions (competence and warmth) and (c) on emotions (admiration, envy and contempt). Finally, mediational analyses were carried out to examine the link between stereotypes, emotions, and behavioral tendencies. Results: The most striking results show that (a) competition and status differentiate leaders and secretaries, (b) men leaders are rated as more competent and less warm than secretaries, whereas women leaders are viewed as more competent than women secretaries but with equivalent warmth, and (c) admiration and envy predict behavioral tendencies, but restricted to professional men regardless of organizational context. Conclusion: Results reveal that cognitive, affective and behavioral components of prejudice act jointly to explain discrimination against women in the workplace. Findings are discussed according to the SCM and the BIAS Map.

Examining the Effects of Male Candidates' Gender Nonconformity on Employment Decisions

Gender differences in the work commitment of Chinese workers: An investigation of two alternative explanations

Gender Discrimination in China: Experimental Evidence from the Job Market for College Graduates

Effects of Subliminal Affective Priming on Occupational Gender Stereotypes

Discouraging Gender-Biased Job Seekers by Adapting Job Advertisements

Effects of Attractiveness and Occupation Type on Attitudes toward Working Women and Men

Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review

Effects of gender sensitive language in job listings: A study on real-life user interaction

Effects of biological and psychological gender, age cohort, and interviewer gender on attitudes toward gender-inclusive/exclusive language

A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

An Invisible Filter for Screening Crafters: Gender Stereotype in Job Crafting Behaviors

Gender discrimination and the backlash effect in recruitment and dismissal processes: experimental evidence from Slovakia

Visual Information and Candidate Evaluations: The Influence of Feminine and Masculine Images on Support for Female Candidates

Gender Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from 19,130 Resumes in China

Violation and Activation of Gender Expectations: Do Chinese Managerial Women Face a Narrow Band of Acceptable Career Guanxi Strategies?

Gender, gender identification and perceived gender discrimination

Testing Two Mechanisms Linking Work-to-family Conflict to Individual Consequences: Do Gender and Gender Role Orientation Make a Difference?

Influence of Environmental Conditions and Interest in the Process of Career Choice Compromise

Perceived competence overrides gender bias: gender roles, affective trust and leader effectiveness

Violating Prescriptive Stereotypes on Job Resumes: A Self-Presentational Perspective

The Effects of Occupational Status and Sex-Typed Jobs on the Evaluation of Men and Women