Abstract:Women (compared to men) and individuals from minority ethnic groups (compared to the majority group) face unfavourable labour market outcomes in many economies1,2, but the extent to which discrimination is responsible for these effects, and the channels through which they occur, remain unclear3,4. Although correspondence tests5-in which researchers send fictitious CVs that are identical except for the randomized minority trait to be tested (for example, names that are deemed to sound 'Black' versus those deemed to sound 'white')-are an increasingly popular method to quantify discrimination in hiring practices6,7, they can usually consider only a few applicant characteristics in select occupations at a particular point in time. To overcome these limitations, here we develop an approach to investigate hiring discrimination that combines tracking of the search behaviour of recruiters on employment websites and supervised machine learning to control for all relevant jobseeker characteristics that are visible to recruiters. We apply this methodology to the online recruitment platform of the Swiss public employment service and find that rates of contact by recruiters are 4-19% lower for individuals from immigrant and minority ethnic groups, depending on their country of origin, than for citizens from the majority group. Women experience a penalty of 7% in professions that are dominated by men, and the opposite pattern emerges for men in professions that are dominated by women. We find no evidence that recruiters spend less time evaluating the profiles of individuals from minority ethnic groups. Our methodology provides a widely applicable, non-intrusive and cost-efficient tool that researchers and policy-makers can use to continuously monitor hiring discrimination, to identify some of the drivers of discrimination and to inform approaches to counter it.

Effects of gender sensitive language in job listings: A study on real-life user interaction

Towards gender-inclusive job postings: A data-driven comparison of augmented writing technologies

The impact of gender-exclusive language on women's anticipated ostracism: A preregistered replication of Stout and Dasgupta (2011)

Gender Bias and Sexism in Language

Effects of biological and psychological gender, age cohort, and interviewer gender on attitudes toward gender-inclusive/exclusive language

Examining potential gender bias in automated-job alerts in the Spanish market

Examining the Effects of Male Candidates' Gender Nonconformity on Employment Decisions

Less than one percent of words would be affected by gender-inclusive language in German press texts

Gender Bias in English: In Search of Fair Language

Gendered Language on the Economics Job Market Rumors Forum

The Lou Dataset -- Exploring the Impact of Gender-Fair Language in German Text Classification

Gauging the Impact of Gender Grammaticization in Different Languages: Application of a Linguistic-Visual Paradigm

Evaluation of Large Language Models: STEM education and Gender Stereotypes

Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads

Monitoring hiring discrimination through online recruitment platforms

Registered report protocol: Perceptual effects of Arabic grammatical gender on occupational expectations in a gamified speech production task

Reducing a Male Bias in Language? Establishing the Efficiency of Three Different Gender-Fair Language Strategies

JobFair: A Framework for Benchmarking Gender Hiring Bias in Large Language Models

A Multilingual Perspective on Probing Gender Bias

Investigating Markers and Drivers of Gender Bias in Machine Translations