Abstract:Extensive literature probes labor market discrimination through correspondence studies in which researchers send pairs of resumes to employers, which are closely matched except for social signals such as gender or ethnicity. Upon perceiving these signals, individuals quickly activate associated stereotypes. The Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske 2002) categorizes these stereotypes into two dimensions: warmth and competence. Our research integrates findings from correspondence studies with theories of social psychology, asking: Can discrimination between social groups, measured through employer callback disparities, be predicted by warmth and competence perceptions of social signals? We collect callback rates from 21 published correspondence studies, varying for 592 social signals. On those social signals, we collected warmth and competence perceptions from an independent group of online raters. We found that social perception predicts callback disparities for studies varying race and gender, which are indirectly signaled by names on these resumes. Yet, for studies adjusting other categories like sexuality and disability, the influence of social perception on callbacks is inconsistent. For instance, a more favorable perception of signals like parenthood does not consistently lead to increased callbacks, underscoring the necessity for further research. Our research offers pivotal strategies to address labor market discrimination in practice. Leveraging the warmth and competence framework allows for the predictive identification of bias against specific groups without extensive correspondence studies. By distilling hiring discrimination into these two dimensions, we not only facilitate the development of decision support systems for hiring managers but also equip computer scientists with a foundational framework for debiasing Large Language Models and other methods that are increasingly employed in hiring processes.

An Invisible Filter for Screening Crafters: Gender Stereotype in Job Crafting Behaviors

How Job Crafters Are Selected During Recruitment: an Invisible Filter Based on Job Crafting Experiences and Applicant Gender

A New Construct in Career Research: Career Crafting

Gender Discrimination in China: Experimental Evidence from the Job Market for College Graduates

Discouraging Gender-Biased Job Seekers by Adapting Job Advertisements

Violating Prescriptive Stereotypes on Job Resumes: A Self-Presentational Perspective

The "double-edged sword" effect of job crafting from the approach-avoidance perspective

Examining the Effects of Male Candidates' Gender Nonconformity on Employment Decisions

College Students on the Job Market and the Screening of Prospective Employers: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in China

Gender Differences in the Sources of Labor Market Appearance Discrimination: Evidence from a Correspondence Study

Perceived warmth and competence predict callback rates in meta-analyzed North American labor market experiments

How different forms of job crafting relate to job satisfaction: The role of person-job fit and age

Interest Incongruence and Job Performance: Examining the Moderating Roles of Job Crafting and Positive Affect

The Impact of Social Factors on Job Crafting: A Meta-Analysis and Review

Why Do Employees Craft Their Jobs: a Qualitative Analysis of Job Crafting Motives from Actor and Observer Perspectives

Gender-targeted job ads in the recruitment process: Facts from a Chinese job board

Gender Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from 19,130 Resumes in China

Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads

Why is Crafting the Job Associated with Less Prosocial Reactions and More Social Undermining? The Role of Feelings of Relative Deprivation and Zero-Sum Mindset

Occupational Self-Efficacy, Job Crafting and Job Satisfaction in Newcomer Socialization: a Moderated Mediation Model

Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review