Gender-targeted job ads in the recruitment process: Facts from a Chinese job board

Peter Kuhn,Kailing Shen,Shuo Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102531
IF: 4.277
2020-11-01
Journal of Development Economics
Abstract:<p>We study how explicit employer requests for applicants of a particular gender enter the recruitment process on a Chinese job board, focusing on two questions: First, to what extent do employers' requests affect the gender mix of a firm's applicant pool? Second, how 'hard' are employers' stated gender requests-- are they essential requirements, soft preferences, or something in between? Using internal data from a Chinese job board, we estimate that an explicit request for men raises men's share in the applicant pool by 14.6 percentage points, or 26.4%; requests for women raises the female applicant share by 24.6 percentage points, or 55.0%. Men (women) who apply to gender-mismatched jobs also experience a substantial call-back penalty of 24 (43) percent. Thus, explicit gender requests do shape applicant pools, and signal a substantial but not absolute preference for the requested gender.</p>
economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address how gender-targeted advertisements in the recruitment process affect job seekers' application patterns and employers' responses. Specifically, the study focuses on two core questions: 1. **Job Seekers' Response**: Do job seekers choose to apply for positions based on the gender specified in the recruitment advertisements? That is, do these ads lead job seekers to apply more for jobs that match their gender and avoid applying for jobs that do not match their gender? 2. **Employers' Rigor**: How strict are employers about the gender requirements stated in the recruitment advertisements? Are these requirements rigid (i.e., absolutely no applicants who do not meet the gender requirement) or just a slight preference, or somewhere in between? By analyzing internal data from a Chinese job search website, the author finds that explicit gender requirements do indeed affect the composition of applicants and significantly influence job seekers' choices. For example, positions explicitly requiring male applicants increase the proportion of male applicants by 14.6 percentage points; positions requiring female applicants increase the proportion of female applicants by 24.6 percentage points. Additionally, applicants whose gender does not match the specified requirement face significant disadvantages in obtaining interview opportunities. These findings help to understand why employers include gender requirements in recruitment advertisements and how these requirements limit gender choices in the labor market.