Abstract:Panel data fail to support a subjective expected utility model of corporate deterrence. There is partial confirmation, however, that chief executives of small organizations who perceive the certainty of detection as high have better regulatory compliance in their organizations. Perceived sanction threats do not work significantly more effectively for chief executives (a) of for-profit versus nonprofit organizations; (b) who are owners as well as managers; (c) who say they think about sanctions more (sanction salience); and (d) who have a weaker belief in the law. Nor does the effectiveness of corporate deterrents depend on compliance costs. There is, however, a significant deterrent effect for managers who are low on emotionality, but an opposite counter-deterrent effect for actors high on emotionality. This supports the critique of those who condemn rational actor models from a sociology of the emotions perspective. Emotions of guilt among managers predict the subsequent compliance of their organizations. The results are consistent with perceptual deterrent studies of individuals that find little effect of formal sanctions and social disapproval as deterrents, but stronger support for an effect of self-disapproval (guilt or shame) on law observance. Qualitative data are used to show why it would be folly to interpret these results as showing that business regulation can work without sanction threats and social disapproval. Rather, the data evince the need for a complete reconceptionalization of the way policy analysts think about the deterrence of law breaking.

Negation of Sanctions: the Personal Effect of Political Contributions

Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

Political Connections and Firm’S Dividend Policy: Evidence from Chinese Privately Owned Firms

Political Capital Vs. Constraint: Evidence from CEO Turnovers in Chinese Private Firms

How Boards’ Factional Faultlines Affect Corporate Financial Fraud

Anti-corruption, Political Connections and Corporate Responses: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

The Influence of Sanctions on Corporate Reporting Behaviour: International Evidence

The Impact of Political Turnover on Corporate Misconduct and Philanthropy: Evidence from China

The Effect of Regulating Political Connections: Evidence from China's Board of Directors Ban

Depoliticization and Corporate Cash Holdings: Evidence from the Mandated Resignation of Directors in China

Political connection, corporate philanthropy and efficiency: Evidence from China’s anti-corruption campaign

Institutional Investors, Political Connections, and the Incidence of Regulatory Enforcement Against Corporate Fraud

Political Connection, Corporate Philanthropy and Efficiency: Evidence from China's Anti-Corruption Campaign

Neural Responses to Sanction Threats in Two-Party Economic Exchange

The Dialectics of Corporate Deterrence

The impact of U.S. economic sanctions on corporate innovation and fraud

Donate to Bribe? Effects of China's Anti-Corruption Campaign on Charity Donations

Corporate philanthropy, political connections, and costs of equity capital

Decoupling the Influence on Corporate Political Actions

Closing the Revolving Door: What if Board Political Connections Are Permanently Broken?

Corporate Political Connections and Favorable Environmental Regulatory Enforcement