Abstract:Our paper builds a novel panel data sourced from the Regional Trade Agreements Database and Database on International Trade in Services Statistics (ITSS) to explore the heterogeneous effects of service trade agreements on services trade. Then we employ a gravity model with the Poisson pseudo‐maximum likelihood (PPML) estimation and obtain the following findings: First, both general service trade agreements and deep service trade agreements promote services trade. Yet, deep trade agreements have a higher trade‐expansion effect (roughly 21.53%) on services trade compared to general ones (16.9%). Next, based on the content of trade‐related provisions, we find provisions of rights of non‐establishment and natural person movement largely increase the services trade, while review provisions do not have a significant impact on services trade. Surprisingly, provisions with MFN status even exhibit a negative relationship with services trade. Third, with whom you sign the agreements matters. Deep trade agreements exert a positive and significant impact on services trade between high‐income countries (NN), low‐income countries (SS) and high‐ to low‐income countries (NS), but are insignificant between low‐ to high‐income countries (SN). Four, emerging regions, including China, may benefit more from deep trade agreements. As indicated by propensity score matching, deep trade agreements reduce service trade costs and improve the business environment more effectively than GTAs. Our empirical results are robust after controlling for the endogeneity of DTAs and GTAs. Our findings provide direct evidence for the role of deep service trade agreements in fostering international economic integration.

Political Relations and Service Trade: Evidence from a Panel Threshold Model

Do political relations affect international trade? Evidence from China’s twelve trading partners

Impacts of Trade Liberalization on Chinese Economy with Belt and Road Initiative

Bilateral Trade and Shocks in Political Relations: Evidence from China and Some of Its Major Trading Partners, 1990–2013

Bilateral Trade and Shocks in Political Relations: Evidence from China and Some of its Major Trading Partners, 1990–2012

Political Embeddedness, Trade Gravity and Goods Export—Empirical Evidence from China and RCEP Trade Partners

Application of gravity model to explain the effects of diplomatic relations on China’s service trade

Sino-Japan political relation and bilateral trade – a cross-quantilogram approach

Bilateral political ties and the stability of services exports

Trade Liberalisation and Labour Income Share Variation: an Interpretation of China’s Deviation from the Stolper–Samuelson Theorem

Influence of Intellectual Property Policies on China’s International Service Trade

Buying Influence? Assessing the Political Effects of China’s International Trade

Political Connections and Trade Expansion : Evidence from Chinese Private Firms

Exploring the Impact of International Trade on Carbon Emissions: New Evidence from China’s 282 Cities

Oil market responses to Sino–European political relation shock: Insights after China's world trade organization accession

Deep trade agreements and services trade: An analysis based on service trade provisions

Bilateral trust and trade: Evidence from China

Deepening of Free Trade Agreements and International Trade: Evidence from China

Is a friend in need a friend indeed? Geopolitical risk, international trade of China, and Belt & Road Initiative

When Trade Discourages Political Favoritism: Evidence from China

Research on the Relationship between Service Trade Liberalization and Economic Growth——Analysis Based on Impulse Response Function