Abstract:Real-life and work-related situations of the 21st century present complex problems that require graduates to possess the skills to solve problems in challenging and unfamiliar arenas. Students must therefore have the skills to deal with a wide range of problems. Unfortunately, most students struggle to apply their learning to novel problem-solving situations regardless of their self-efficacy beliefs. It appears particularly significant to investigate this phenomenon in the context of physics education. Using a mixed-methods design within a collaborative learning environment (CLE), this study investigated the factors that influence students’ self-efficacy in solving conceptual mathematical problems in physics. The primary data sources were the science problem solving questionnaire (SPSQ), the self-efficacy rating scale (SERS), and two semi-structured interview items. The results of multi-level regression and descriptive data analysis revealed students’ self-efficacy in solving conceptual mathematical problems in physics (β=.16, p<.01, SE=.065). Among all the self-efficacy variables (e.g., mastery experience, vicarious experience, physical arousal, anxiety, and gender), mastery experiences composed the largest amount of unique variance between male and female students (36% and 21%). The regression coefficient showed a significant difference between male (β=.13, p<.01, SE=.02) and female (β=.34, p<.01, SE=.07). Female students reported slightly higher levels of anxiety (3%) than male students (2%) when completing the SPSQ. In terms of physiological states, females reported 7% and males 1%. The results also showed a strong positive relationship between the instructional approach and student performance (r=.86, p<.001). One major implication of this study is that science educators could include appropriate instruction in delivering content courses to potentially support student teachers at the beginning of their science education studies.

The Scourge of Online Solutions and an Academic Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram

Comparing introductory physics and astronomy students' attitudes and approaches to problem solving

The impact of incoming preparation and demographics on performance in Physics I: a multi-institution comparison

Introductory Astronomy as a Measure of Grade Inflation

Student performance analysis of virtual introductory calculus-based physics class

An Investigation into the Correlations between Students' Written Responses to Lecture-Tutorial Questions and their Understandings of Key Astrophysics Concepts

Investigating the Use of Mastery-Style Online Homework Exercises in Introductory Algebra-based Mechanics in a Controlled Clinical Study

Cheat sites and artificial intelligence usage in online introductory physics courses: what is the extent and what effect does it have on assessments?

Surveying Graduate Students' Attitudes and Approaches to Problem Solving

Facilitating Problem Solving in a University Undergraduate Physics Classroom: The Case of Students’ Self-Efficacy

Students' perspectives on computational challenges in physics class

Surveying college introductory physics students' attitudes and approaches to problem solving

Fluctuations in Student Understanding of Newton's 3rd Law

The benefits of completing homework for students with different aptitudes in an introductory physics course

Lessons from a Large-Scale Assessment: Results from Free Response Pre- and Post-testing in Electricity and Magnetism

Automaticity in Computation and Student Success in Introductory Physical Science Courses

Student Variability in Learning Advanced Physics

The Initial State of Students Taking an Introductory Physics MOOC

Assessing student reasoning in upper-division electricity and magnetism at Oregon State University

Blogging in the physics classroom: A research-based approach to shaping students' attitudes towards physics