Early Confucianism and Virtue Ethics: The Relativism in Confucianism Studies——A Discussion with Ames and Rosemont
HAN Zhen-hua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9115.2012.03.024
2012-01-01
Abstract:Since the mid-20th century, the revival of virtue ethics in the west hasbeen an important phenomenon. Bryan W. Van Norden, Philip J. Ivanhoe, andsome other western sinologists attempt to reinterpret early Confucian ethics withreferences to virtue ethics by searching for ethical dialogues between China andthe West. Meanwhile, Roger T. Ames together with Henry Rosemont, in their "IsEarly Confucianism Virtue Ethics?" , take a completely different perspectivethat the early Confucian ethics is a kind of role ethics, and that Confucianismnever emphasizes universality but focuses on particularity instead. This paperattempts to explore this issue from the following three perspectives: First~ virtueethics is an integrant part of Confucian ethics. Though in a more implicit waycompared with Neo-Confucian, the early Confucian still entailed virtue theory.Therefore, the perspective of virtue ethics could be applied to Confucian ethics,which would open a new horizon for the studies of Confucian ethics. Second,Ames and Rosemont's point of view could be somewhat inspiring, but theirdiscourse is much more to reveal their own theoretical vision self-referentially,which are process philosophy, anti-essentialism, new pragmatism withpractice-priority, than to clarify the fundamental characteristics of the ea,r, lyConfucian ethics. Ames and Rosemont view role ethics as an "Occam's razorbut this "razor" will only make an excessively post-modernized and one-sidedConfucian ethics. Third, the role ethics, associated with the relativisticinclination, extremely excludes the value demand of universalism, and it ignoresthe natural tension between relativism and universalism. Chinese cultural agents,who adopt this absolute relativism as the principal of their own beliefs, are justplacing limits on themselves. The role ethics fail to prevent or eliminate moralconflicts between different ethical systems, let alone making cross-culturalcommunication and integration possible.