Abstract:In the Late Qing and the Republic of China,scholars had developed different paths in transforming traditional academics and bridging Sino-Western and old-new in the context of the evolution of Classical Studies and Historiography.Two distinct schools of Confucianism came into being in the Republic of China: one was the historical ″Guwen″ represented by Zhang Taiyan and his students,the other was the philosophic Jinwen represented by Liaoping and his students.With the aggravation of the National Calamity in the 1930s and revival of Confucianism,it was a common practice to promote Chinese culture and national spirits.Thus the transformation and practice of Confucianism became the focus in the discussion between the two different schools.During the dispute Meng Wentong and Li Yuancheng,Liao Ping's students,argued with Zhang Taiyan and Huang Kan constantly about sinology and Neo-Confucianism,″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen,″ and ″Classical Studies″ and ″Historiography″ to clarify the origin and development of Confucian philosophy. After a careful study of Qing's academic history and looking into the relations between Dai Zhen's philosophy and Xun Zi,Zhang Taiyan emphasized the unique significance of Dai Zhen in Qing's Academic history.On the contrary,Meng Wentong and Li Yuancheng resorted to traditional sinology and Confucian theories to question the construction of Dai Zhen's theory.Based on the examination of Examine Goodness,Li Yuancheng criticized Dai Zhen's doctrine of Ethics,Desire and Goodness as a misunderstanding of Mencius.Based on Guwen and centreing around the separation of Confucianism and Buddhism,Zhang Taiyan stressed the reliability of the historical account of the Six Classics to respond to the Skeptical School and illustrated the ideological and cultural tradition of China in the past two thousand years.Li Yuancheng had developed Liao Ping's theory and discussed with Zhang Taiyan the Rites and Spring and Autumn aiming to link ″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen″ and to reiterate the Great Righteousness of Spring and Autumn.Meng Wentong,through his study of the development of Confucian philosophy in Zhou dynasty,Qin dynasty and the two Han dynasties,attempted to find the succession of Confucianism and Mencius's thoughts,to analyze the philosophy of ″humanity and destiny,″ to interpret the controversies over Mencius and Xun Zi,to clarify the origin of sinology,and to challenge Cheng Zhu Confucian Orthodoxy.In short,Liao Ping's students had constructed a Confucian system based on the ″Goodness″ of Mencius,theoretically paving the way for for Jinwen and Confucian historiography. The school of Zhang Taiyan-Huang Kan purported to explore the development of national cultures,focused on the language and history,and advocated the cultivation of mind and behavior.Thus,it had associated moral ethics with political and social pragmaticism and had started the practical academics of Classical Studies and Historiography.In contrast,Liao Ping's students emphasized on constructing an dynamic interaction between the meanings of Classics,institution,and historical facts,carrying forward the ″New Confucianism of Qin and Han,″ and elucidating the revolutionary spirit of Jinwen and system design.Dispute of ″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen″ manifested the core difference of the academic interests between the schools of Zhang Taiyan-Huang Kan and Liao Ping's students.A clarification of their differences and disputes is of importance in interpreting the diversification of modern Confucianism and providing intellectual resources for the building of a nation-state or a civilization-state.

Understanding the Ethical Universe of Neo-Confucianism

Dispute of ″Jinwen″ and ″Guwen″ and Orientation of Confucianism under the Background of ″National Calamity″

A Study of The Neo-confucian Mencius View in Chinese Philosophy

The Neo-Confucian Life-spirit and Its Sustainable Horizon of Unifying Human Nature and Mandate from the Perspective of Cultural Ecologism: Focusing upon Zhang-zai's Model of Qi Doctrine

Neo-Confucian's Misreading of Buddhism and its Reasons

Internal and External Transcendence:Religious Beliefs,Moral Beliefs and Order

Mencius, Xunzi, and the Third Stage of Confucianism

Moral Education and Ideology: The Revival of Confucian Values and the Harmonious Shaping of the New Chinese Man

Reconstructing (neo)confucianism in a “glocal” Postmodern Culture Context

Reason for the Life Ethics of Confucianism Being “sheng Sheng” Chinese Full Text

The Confucian Conception Of Transcendence And Filial Piety

Tracing the Pathways: The Geographical Evolution of Confucian Culture in East Asia

Confucianism and Modernization of China in a Global Perspective

Liberty in Harmony: An Integration of Confucian Harmony and Liberalism in Contemporary China

The ontologicalization of the Confucian concept of Xin Xing: Zhou Lianxi’s founding contribution to the Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism

Neo-Confucianism and its influence in Song Dynasty

Philosophy and Intercultural Communication: The Phenomenon of a Human Being in the Confucian Tradition

Values and Worldview of Chinese Civilization

Relevancy of Confucian Spiritual Resources to Modernity Academic Dialogue on Enlightenment Reflection

Analysis of the relationship between heaven and man in Neo-Confucianism from an ecological perspective

The Influence of the German Idealists on the Contemporary New Confucians