Abstract:With this paper, I suggest a multiperspectivist approach for assessing conceptual legal knowledge with relevance for the translation of legal terms in translation between two or more different legal systems. The basic quest is to present a set of categories and analytical approaches for legal translators to generate (collect) and classify knowledge necessary for their professional conceptual needs. In this paper, I will focus on the translational, juridical, and cognitive basics of such an approach. In order to cope with the broad range of possible translational purposes in different translational situations and choose relevantly between alternative formulations, translators need methods and strategies in order to construct the necessary conceptual knowledge. This presupposes a broad knowledge structured in ways that enable the translator to recognize relevant characteristics of legal systems and relevant differences between different legal systems. Concerning translational theory, the basis is the functional theory of translation as adapted to legal translation, based upon the idea of translation as choice between alternatives and distinguishing between documentary translation, at one end of a scale, and instrumental translation, at the other. This basis and the distinction presuppose relevant knowledge from comparative law. Hence, existing approaches and fundamental tenets concerning comparative law inside and outside of translation are presented. In order for knowledge to be presented in a manageable way with relevance to translators, I work with the approach of concept frames as basic unit of knowledge gathering and categorization. This way of presenting knowledge is embedded more generally in a knowledge communication approach, focusing on knowledge asymmetry. Within this general framework, the multiperspectivist approach combines insights from cultural studies (especially the study of law-as-culture), law as a disciplinary social system, and communicative interaction generating meanings in legal communication, also across national borders.

Commentary on the Italian Civil Code:History,Structure and Function

Judging the Method of Economic Analysis of Law

On the General Part of Civil Code and its Legislation Pattern

The Compromise Contract In Italian Civil Code

Modals and Modality in Legal Discourse: A Corpus-Based Sociosemiotic Interpretation

The Italian Code of Medical Deontology. Historical, ethical and legal issues

Exploratory Research on Codifying the Civil Law of China

Law As a Culturally Constituted Sign-System – A Space for Interpretation

Modals and Modality in Legal Discourse

International Law and Translation in the 19th century

Selected institutions of the General part of the Polish Civil Code

Legal translation

On the Foundation of Interpretations of a Civil Law and the Application of Methods in the Interpretations

Civil Laws in China and Judicial Cases

Comparative Law for Legal Translation: Through Multiple Perspectives to Multidimensional Knowledge

The European Court of Justice as a Constitutional Court. Legal Reasoning in a Comparative Perspective

The Innovation and Contemporary Value of the Compilation of Chinese Civil Code

A dataset for evaluating legal question answering on private international law

The Commentary of the Federalist:the Difference Between Classical Republicanism and Liberal Republicanism

Large Language Models and Explainable Law: a Hybrid Methodology

A Historical Perspective on the Unification of Private Law and the Future of the Civil Code