Abstract:When a government agency considers tightening a standard on a pollutant, the agency often takes into account the proportion of firms that are able to meet the new standard (what we refer to as the industry's "voluntary adoption level"), because a higher proportion indicates a more feasible standard. We develop a novel model of regulation in which the probability of a stricter standard being enacted increases with an industry's voluntary adoption level. In addition, in our model, the benefit of a new green technology is both uncertain and correlated across firms, and firms' decisions exhibit both strategic substitutability (because the marketing benefit of a new green technology decreases as more firms adopt it) and complementarity (because the stricter standard is more likely to be enforced as more firms adopt it). To analyze such strategic interaction among firms' decisions under correlated uncertain payoffs, we use the global game framework recently developed in economics. Our analysis shows that regulation that considers an industry's voluntary adoption level, compared with regulation that ignores it, can more effectively motivate development of a new green technology. Surprisingly, uncertainty in the payoff can also help promote development of a new green technology. Finally, we find that more aggressive regulation (a higher probability of enforcing a stricter standard for a given voluntary adoption level) encourages more firms to adopt a green technology once the technology becomes available, but may discourage a firm from developing it in the first place when facing intense competition. Therefore, for an industry with intense competition, a government agency should exercise caution about being too aggressive with regulation, which could potentially stifle innovation.

The Role of False-Claims Ban Regulation in Greenwashing of Firms with Imprecise Greenness Information

Combating greenwashers in emerging markets: A game-theoretical exploration of firms, customers and government regulations

Environmental Regulation, Greenwashing Behaviour, and Green Governance of High-Pollution Enterprises in China

To be green or not to be: How governmental regulation shapes financial institutions' greenwashing behaviors in green finance

How to govern greenwashing behaviors in green finance products: a tripartite evolutionary game approach

Bad Greenwashing, Good Greenwashing: Corporate Social Responsibility and Information Transparency

Governance of Greenwashing Behaviors: A Perspective of Heterogeneous Firm Types

Effects of Greenwashing on Financial Performance: Moderation Through Local Environmental Regulation and Media Coverage

Third-party certification: how to effectively prevent greenwash in green bond market? –analysis based on signalling game

How Do Firms Respond to Third-Party Information with Quality Information Provision Strategies?

How to prevent "greenwash" in green retrofit process under PPP model: an evolutionary game theory-based analysis

False Advertising

How the Market Values Greenwashing? Evidence from China

Window Dressing in Impression Management: Does Negative Media Coverage Drive Corporate Green Production?

A Dynamic Evolutionary Game to Discourage Enterprise "Greenwashing"

A Game Analysis of Fraudulent Reporting of Listed Companies When Government Reputation Interferes

Regulatory pressure and consumer environmental awareness in a green supply chain with retailer responsibility: A dynamic analysis

Can blockchain help curb "greenwashing" in green finance? - Based on tripartite evolutionary game theory

Green Technology Development and Adoption: Competition, Regulation, and Uncertainty - A Global Game Approach

Green Packaging or Greenwashing? Implications of Bring-Your-Own-Container

Impact of "environmental disclosure greenwashing": a study from the perspective of heterogeneous environmental policies