Abstract:Purpose The authors consider a dynamic emission-reduction technology investment decision-making problem for an emission-dependent dyadic supply chain consists of a manufacturer and a retailer under subsidy policy for carbon emission reduction. The consumers are assumed to prefer to low-carbon products and formulate a supply chain optimal control problem. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt differential game to analyze investment strategies of cost subsidy coefficient with respect to vertical incentive of a manufacturer and a retailer. A comparison analysis under four different decision-making situations, including decentralized decision-making, centralized decision-making, maximizing social welfare, is obtained. Findings The results show that the economic benefit and environmental pressure have a win–win performance in centralized decision-making. In four different game models, equilibrium strategies, profits and social welfare show changing diversity and have a consistent development trend as time goes on. Research limitations/implications The authors estimate the demand function is a linear function in this paper. According to the consumers’ preference to low-carbon products, consumer’s awareness meets the law of diminishing marginal utility like advertising goodwill accumulation. The carbon-sensitive coefficient might be a quadratic expression, which will complicate the problem and be consistent with reality. Practical implications It captures that there is a necessity to strengthen cooperation and exchange of carbon emission technology among the enterprises by simulation of different decision-makings when government granted cost subsidy. Social implications The results provide significant guidelines for the supply chain to make decision-makings of emission-reduction technology investment and relevant government departments to determine emission subsidies costs. Originality/value An endogenous subsidies coefficient is produced by the social welfare function. Distinguished from previous study, it also considered the influences of carbon emission trade policy and consumer preference.

ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION MODELLING WITH SPILLOVER EFFECTS UNDER DIFFERENT MARKET STRUCTURES

Dynamic Game between Oligopoly Manufacturers in Pollution Abatement Technology Investment under Information Spillover

Optimal Abatement Technology Adoption Based Upon Learning-By-Doing with Spillover Effect

Abatement technology innovation, worker productivity and firm profitability: A dynamic analysis

Decarbonizing innovation investment strategy in competing supply chains considering technology spillovers and environmental regulation

A Differential Game Analysis of the Firms’ Process Innovation with Technological Spillover under Different Market Structures in a Duopoly Market

Technology spillover,R&D investment,and the effect of social welfare

Research and development model, technology spillovers and optimal government subsidy

Investment Game Model Analysis of Emission-Reduction Technology Based on Cost Sharing and Coordination under Cost Subsidy Policy

Abatement Technology Innovation and Pollution Tax Design: A Dynamic Analysis in Monopoly

Who Invests More in Advanced Abatement Technology? Theory and Evidence

Investment in environmental innovation with environmental regulation and consumers’ environmental awareness: A dynamic analysis

Generic technology R&D decision with technology spillover, cost difference, and bargaining power under oligopoly competition

Government Participation in Supply Chain Low-Carbon Technology R&D and Green Marketing Strategy Optimization

The Cooperative Innovation Pattern under the Investment and Output Spillover of R&D

To Abate, or Not to Abate? The Arising of the Win–Win Solution Under Time Consistent Emission Taxation

Government regulation, horizontal coopetition, and low-carbon technology innovation: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis of government and homogeneous energy enterprises

Carbon Reduction Decisions in Green Technology Collaborative R&D and Spillover Time Lag Effects

Firms Pollution Abatement R&D Investment Strategy on Tradable Emissions Permits

Duopoly R&D Investments in Pollution Abatement and Product Strategy under Emission Trading

Investment strategy analysis of emission-reduction technology under cost subsidy policy in the carbon trading market