Abstract:Purpose The authors consider a dynamic emission-reduction technology investment decision-making problem for an emission-dependent dyadic supply chain consists of a manufacturer and a retailer under subsidy policy for carbon emission reduction. The consumers are assumed to prefer to low-carbon products and formulate a supply chain optimal control problem. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt differential game to analyze investment strategies of cost subsidy coefficient with respect to vertical incentive of a manufacturer and a retailer. A comparison analysis under four different decision-making situations, including decentralized decision-making, centralized decision-making, maximizing social welfare, is obtained. Findings The results show that the economic benefit and environmental pressure have a win–win performance in centralized decision-making. In four different game models, equilibrium strategies, profits and social welfare show changing diversity and have a consistent development trend as time goes on. Research limitations/implications The authors estimate the demand function is a linear function in this paper. According to the consumers’ preference to low-carbon products, consumer’s awareness meets the law of diminishing marginal utility like advertising goodwill accumulation. The carbon-sensitive coefficient might be a quadratic expression, which will complicate the problem and be consistent with reality. Practical implications It captures that there is a necessity to strengthen cooperation and exchange of carbon emission technology among the enterprises by simulation of different decision-makings when government granted cost subsidy. Social implications The results provide significant guidelines for the supply chain to make decision-makings of emission-reduction technology investment and relevant government departments to determine emission subsidies costs. Originality/value An endogenous subsidies coefficient is produced by the social welfare function. Distinguished from previous study, it also considered the influences of carbon emission trade policy and consumer preference.

Duopoly R&D Investments in Pollution Abatement and Product Strategy under Emission Trading

Monitoring Strategies of Enterprise's Emission Reduction with Asymmetric Information.

Dynamic Optimal Strategies in Transboundary Pollution Game under Learning by Doing

Investment Strategy of Emission-Reduction Technology in a Supply Chain

Green finance, loan commitment, and environmental corporate social responsibility in a differentiated duopoly

Collaborative Strategy Within China's Emission Trading Scheme: Evidence from a Tripartite Evolutionary Game Model

Optimal Technology Investment under Emission Trading Policy

The Impact of Foreign Ownership on the Choice Between Emission Taxes and Emission Standards*

Investment Game Model Analysis of Emission-Reduction Technology Based on Cost Sharing and Coordination under Cost Subsidy Policy

Dynamic Strategy Analysis of Emission-Reduction Technology Investment Based on Pricing Coordination Mechanism under Cost Subsidy Policy

Production Strategy Selection and Carbon Emission Reduction with Consumer Heterogeneity under Cap-and-Trade Regulation

Investment strategy analysis of emission-reduction technology under cost subsidy policy in the carbon trading market

Double managerial delegation contracts with relative profit performance and environmental performance incentives under emission taxes

Government Participation in Supply Chain Low-Carbon Technology R&D and Green Marketing Strategy Optimization

Equality and efficiency tradeoffs in revenue recycling of emission trading scheme: a case study on the recent chinese national ETS market

Evolutionary game analysis of air pollution co-investment in emission reductions by steel enterprises under carbon quota trading mechanism

Policy analysis for emission-reduction with green technology investment in manufacturing

Carbon emission reduction decisions of supply chain members under cap-and-trade regulations: A differential game analysis

Decision models of emission reduction considering CSR under reward-penalty policy

Tripartite evolutionary game analysis on corporate carbon reduction decisions considering dual supervision under carbon trading

Research on single/cooperative emission reduction strategy under different power structures