Thermodynamic Analysis and Optimization of a Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (S-CO2) Recompression Cycle Coupled with a Bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle

Aozheng Zhou,Xiaodong Ren,Xuesong Li,Chunwei Gu,Jian Song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33737/gpps19-bj-167
2019-01-01
Abstract:A supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) and Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) combined cycle has been considered to fully use the residual heat of a high temperature heat source in this paper. The topping cycle is a S-CO2 recompression cycle, and the bottoming cycle is an ORC with R245fa as the working fluid. Compared with previous studies, the influence of several additional parameters, including the S-CO2 recompression cycle main compressor inlet temperature and pressure and the S-CO2 recompression cycle split ratio, has been conducted. It indicates that the split ratio plays an important role on the S-CO2 recompression cycle, even on the combined cycle. A thermodynamic optimization method which considers the split ratio is proposed to maximum the combined cycle thermal efficiency. By this method, more than 4.1% increment on the thermal efficiency can be attained. INTRODUCTION The supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) is a special kind of CO2 fluid whose temperature and pressure are higher than its critical values (304.13K, 7.38 MPa). The S-CO2 cycle, which uses S-CO2 as the working fluid, is considered to be one of the most promising power generation technologies for the future (Feher, 1968). The S-CO2 cycle has higher efficiency and more compact system and components than conventional power cycles, especially in the high temperature range. Besides, CO2 is easy to obtain and the S-CO2 cycle system has high safety level. It is widely acknowledged that the S-CO2 cycle is applicable for various heat sources, such as the nuclear energy (Moisseytsev and Sienicki, 2009), concentrated solar power (Turchi and Ma, 2012), fuel cell (Xia et al., 2019) and waste heat recovery (Song et al., 2018a). One of the S-CO2 cycle characteristics is that the specific heat capacity of the cold side flow is much higher than that of the hot side in recuperators. For the S-CO2 recompression cycle, the CO2 flow is split to compensate for the specific heat difference in the low temperature recuperator and to further enhance the heat recuperation in the high temperature recuperator. Therefore, the residual heat is decreased and the S-CO2 recompression cycle has higher efficiency than simple recuperated cycle. The S-CO2 recompression cycle has been adopted by National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) of U.S. DOE for Supercritical Transformational Electric Power (STEP) program (Lambruschini et al., 2016).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?