Ethical Healthcare During Public Health Emergencies: A Focus on Non-COVID-19 Patients
Man Teng Iong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s485356
2024-11-17
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Abstract:Man Teng Iong Faculty of Law, University of Macau, Macao, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Man Teng Iong, Faculty of Law (FLL), University of Macau, E32, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau, People's Republic of China, Email Governments worldwide have made significant efforts to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Nonetheless, measures against the COVID-19 outbreak have raised concerns relating to the measures that can affect health and endanger the lives of patients not related to COVID-19 but needing emergency treatments. For instance, ambulances were sometimes unable to access restricted zones for patients in urgent situations, and emergency departments were closed or refused urgent cases due to healthcare policies during the pandemic. To prevent such issues in future public health emergencies, changes to existing pandemic prevention measures are necessary. This article, through narrative review, intends to find a better healthcare policy during pandemic to protect proportionally public health and simultaneously guarantee the health and lives of non-COVID-19 patients needing emergency care. For this purpose, it provides three suggestions: ensuring ambulance access to confined areas, strengthening emergency department capabilities, and finding a balance between pandemic control and respect for patient rights. These suggestions are paramount to safeguard public health while securing the health and living for those needing urgent medical care. Keywords: healthcare policy, pandemic, COVID-19, individual rights, public health The COVID-19 outbreak caused an unknown global health crisis and compelled governments and health systems worldwide to take strict measures to avoid the spread of the virus. These measures were necessary to protect public health, but at the same time caused ethical and functional problems, particularly for patients unrelated to COVID-19 virus but needing emergency care. This article, using narrative review methodology, examines the ethical and practical consequences of restrictive public health policies during the emergence of COVID-19 and emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to ensure that non-COVID-19 patients receive appropriate and acceptable emergency services in time. The urgency to address these challenges is highlighted in cases where pandemic control measures have adversely affected non-COVID-19 cases. For example, ambulances are denied access to restricted areas, emergency services are closed, and urgent care is denied, resulting in preventable disease and mortality. Similar scenarios illustrate the crucial need for public health policy that is both effective in controlling pandemics and adapts to the immediate medical needs of all cases. Even though in the current literature we can find research paying attention to the situation of non-COVID-19 patients, 1 there is no study addressing the problems that this study addresses, namely restriction of ambulance access and closure or refusal of emergency department. The aim of this article is to contribute to public health ethics by proposing useful recommendations to improve the delivery of healthcare in the event of public health emergencies. It advocates ensuring ambulance access in restricted areas, strengthening emergency service capabilities, maintaining a balancing relationship between pandemic control measures and respect for patient rights. Through these recommendations, it attempts to promote a more equitable approach to healthcare in times of crisis, ensuring necessary care for non-COVID-19 patients in need of emergency services. The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic presented an unprecedented challenge for governments worldwide, necessitating swift and decisive actions to control the spread of the virus and protect public health. Nonetheless, it is not the first severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) occurring in our history. The first emergence of SARS can be traced back to February 2003, when it broke out in China and spread to four other countries. 2 Although with the first experience against SARS, humanity was as helpless against COVID-19 as it was when it experienced SARS for the first time. Given the lack of medication, the most effective way against the COVID-19 virus was halting its transmission. 3 The measures taken by countries worldwide to prevent the virus's spread and lessen its effects on the populace included, but not limited to, quarantine, temporary closing of outbound routes and public areas, travel restrictions, social distancing, personal protective equipment, cleaning and disinfection, set-up of fever clinics, enhancement of testing capacity, expansion of healthcare infrastructure, use of digital technology for contact tracing. For instance, the Chinese government's first step against the COVID-19 outbreak was a temporary closing of outbound routes -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services,health policy & services