Abstract:<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Information disclosure is a top priority for official responses to the 2019 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). The information published by the authorities as a response to the crisis has been a cause of great concern to the public; however, there is limited evidence of any systematic analyses of the disclosed epidemic information. This in turn has important implications for risk communication. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aimed to describe and compare the officially released content regarding the local epidemic situations and analyze the characteristics of information disclosure through local transmission for both the individual and total population levels in major cities of China. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> The 31 capital cities in mainland China were enrolled in a city-level observational study. Data were retrieved from local municipalities and health commission websites as of March 18, 2020. A checklist was employed as a rapid qualitative assessment tool to analyze the information disclosure performance of each city. Descriptive analyses and data visualizations were produced to present and compare the comparative performances of the cities. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> In total, 29 cities (93.5%) established specific COVID-19 webpages to disclose information. Among them, 12 of the city webpages were added to their corresponding municipal websites. A majority of the cities (21 of 31, 67.7%) published their first cases of infection in a timely manner on the actual day of confirmation. Regarding the information disclosures highlighted on the websites, news updates from local media or press briefings were the most prevalent (28 of 29, 96.6%), followed by epidemic surveillance (25 of 29, 86.2%) and advice for the public (25 of 29, 86.2%). Clarifications of misinformation and frequently asked questions were largely overlooked as only 2 cities provided this valuable information. The median daily update frequency of epidemic surveillance summaries was 1.2 times per day (interquartile range 1.0 to 1.3 times), and the majority of these summaries (18 of 25, 72.0%) also provided detailed information of confirmed cases. The reporting of key indicators in the epidemic surveillance summaries, as well as critical facts included in the confirmed case reports, varied substantially between cities. In general, the best performance in terms of timely reporting and the transparency of information disclosures were observed in the municipalities directly administered by the central government compared to the other cities. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Timely and effective efforts to disclose information related to the COVID-19 epidemic have been made in major cities of China. Continued improvements to local authority reporting will contribute to more effective public communication and efficient public health research responses. The development of protocols and the standardization of epidemic message templates—as well as the use of uniform operating procedures to provide regular information updates—should be prioritized to ensure a coordinated national response. </sec>

Analysis of the Government and Capital Market's Response to Normalized Epidemic Prevention and Control Based on the Development of Smart Health Care

Characterizing the Patterns of China's Policies Against COVID-19: A Bibliometric Study.

Information disclosure during the COVID-19 epidemic in China: A city-level observational study (Preprint)

China's model to combat the COVID-19 epidemic: a public health emergency governance approach

Governance Capability of the Public Health System: A Comparative Analysis of the Control of COVID-19 in the Different Provinces of China

Information Disclosure During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: City-Level Observational Study.

The Response of the Government's Emergency System to the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: A Retrospective Comparative Study

The trend of morbidity and mortality of Coronavirus disease 2019 under the first-level public health emergency response in China

Emergency Rescue System for Public Health Emergencies in China

Appraisal Of China'S Response To The Outbreak Of Covid-19 In Comparison With Sars

Governing public health emergencies during the coronavirus disease outbreak: Lessons from four Chinese cities in the first wave

[Experience and thinking on the normalization stage of prevention and control of COVID-19 in China].

Ethical Issues in the Prevention and Control of Coronavirus Disease 2019

Precise Control and Integrated Management of Public Health Emergencies

The Impact of COVID-19 Prevention Policy on Stock Market Return of China

Government Information Dissemination During Public Health Emergencies: An Analysis of China's Experiences

Game analysis on the evolution of COVID-19 epidemic under the prevention and control measures of the government

The System and Core Mechanisms of Governing Major Pandemic Crisis-a Brief Discussion

Effective Responses to Public Emergencies at the Urban Community Level: A Perspective of COVID-19 Prevention and Control

Interactive Governance Between and Within Governmental Levels and Functions: A Social Network Analysis of China's Case Against COVID-19.