The Effect of Person-First Language on Obesity Stigma

Rebecca K. Hoffman,Stacy M. Post,Tonya Dodge,Michelle L. Stock

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241284551

2024-10-09

American Journal of Health Promotion

Abstract:American Journal of Health Promotion, Ahead of Print. PurposeTo test the assumption that person-first language (PFL) reduces obesity stigma, mediated by perceived personal responsibility for obesity.DesignCross-sectional, experimental.SettingOnline, United States.Participants299 young adults.MeasuresParticipants read a vignette using PFL or identity-first language (IFL) or about someone without obesity. Participants reported perceived personal responsibility for obesity, and 3 operationalizations of obesity stigma: prejudice, stereotypes, and support for punitive policies. Mediation analyses were used to test if the manipulation affected obesity stigma, through perceived personal responsibility.ResultsThere was no indirect effect of PFL vs IFL on the 3 outcomes (95% CIs contained zero). However, the indirect effects of PFL vs no-obesity condition were significant (prejudice: β = −0.10, SE = 0.05, 95% CI [−0.22, −0.01]; stereotypes: (β = 0.07, SE = 0.03, 95% CI [0.01, 0.14]); punitive punishment: (β = −0.06, SE = 0.04, 95% CI [−0.15, −0.01]). Also, the indirect effects of IFL vs no-obesity condition on stereotypes (β = 0.07, SE = 0.04, 95% CI [0.0003, 0.15]) and punitive punishment (β = −0.06, SE = 0.04, 95% CI [−0.15, −0.0002]) were significant.ConclusionPFL may not affect obesity stigma as it does in the context of other marginalized groups. The effect of PFL and IFL, compared to the no-obesity condition, suggests future routes for intervention.

public, environmental & occupational health