Abstract:The article proposes an account of the prevailing classical Chinese conception of reasoning and argumentation that grounds it in a semantic theory and epistemology centered on drawing distinctions (biàn ) between the similar and dissimilar kinds of things that do or do not fall within the extension of ‘names’ (míng ). The article presents two novel interpretive hypotheses. First, for pre-Hàn Chinese thinkers, the functional role associated with the logical copula is filled by a general notion of similarity or sameness (tóng ). Second, these thinkers’ basic explanation of reasoning is that it is a process of moving from a comparison of whether something is similar to a ‘model’ or ‘standard’ ( fǎ ) to a judgment about whether that thing is part of a certain kind (lèi ). Classical texts treat judgment as the attitude of predicating a ‘name’ of something, or, equivalently, of distinguishing whether something is the kind of thing denoted by a certain term. Reasoning is treated as a process of considering how some acts of term predication, or drawing distinctions, normatively commit one to making further, analogous predications or drawing further, analogous distinctions. Inference is thus understood as the act of distinguishing something as a certain kind of thing as a result of having distinguished it as similar to a relevant ‘model’ or ‘standard’. The article concludes by summarizing the consequences of the proposed account of early Chinese semantic and logical theories for the interpretation of other areas of classical Chinese thought.

The Semantic Equivalence Between the Good and the Right: Its Support for and Challenge to Consequentialism

The Relationship Between the Good and the Right in the Context of Chinese Philosophy

A Moral Argument for the Priority of the Right over the Good: A Case Study of the Confucian Ethics

Terminological Equivalence in Legal Translation: A Semiotic Approach

A Principle-Based Robustness Analysis of Admissibility-Based Argumentation Semantics

Partial Semantics of Argumentation: Basic Properties and Empirical

Enhancing Dung’s Preferred Semantics

Defense Semantics of Argumentation: Encoding Reasons for Accepting Arguments.

Partial Semantics of Argumentation

Going Forth and Drawing Back: an Intensional Approach in Nonmonotonic Inference.

Sub-Frameworks and Local Semantics

Social Welfare Semantics for Value-Based Argumentation Framework.

Prioritized Norms in Formal Argumentation

Relevance Theory, Semantic Content and Pragmatic Enrichment

What is the attitude of desire?

Justice as the Virtue of “No Unacceptable Harm to the Human”

Theoretical Advantage of Utilitarianism and its Current Development

Impossible and Conflicting Obligations in Justification Logic

Deontic Logic And Preference Change

Distinctions, Judgment, and Reasoning in Classical Chinese Thought

What makes moral dilemma judgments “utilitarian” or “deontological”?