A Principle-Based Robustness Analysis of Admissibility-Based Argumentation Semantics

Tjitze Rienstra,Chiaki Sakama,Leendert van der Torre,Beishui Liao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/aac-200520
2020-01-01
Argument & Computation
Abstract:The principle-based approach is a methodology to classify and analyse argumentation semantics. In this paper we classify seven of the main alternatives for argumentation semantics using a set of new robustness principles. These principles complement Baroni and Giacomin’s original classification and deal with the behaviour of a semantics when the argumentation framework changes due to the addition or removal of an attack between two arguments. We distinguish so-called persistence principles and monotonicity principles, where the former deal with the question of whether a labelling or extension of an argumentation framework under a given semantics persists after a change, and the latter with the question of whether new labellings or extensions are created after a change. We furthermore show in which sense labelling-based and extension-based semantics lead to subtly different principles and results. Our results can be used for choosing a semantics for a particular application, or to guide the search for new argumentation semantics, but they have been used also in the design of algorithms.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?