State Tax Rate Changes and Leveraged Buyouts: US Evidence

Dawei Jin,Hao Shen,Haizhi Wang,Desheng Yin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/s1569-373220220000021003

2022-01-01

Abstract:Purpose This chapter investigates whether and to what extent tax benefits affect the likelihood of firms undertaking leveraged buyout (LBO) transactions.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Effect of Ownership Structure on Leverage Decision: New Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Qigui Liu,Gary Tian,Xiaoming Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2011.564755

2011-01-01

Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy

Abstract:This paper examines the effect of state control and ownership structure on the leverage decision of firms listed in the Chinese stock market. Our results show that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) have higher leverage ratios than non-SOEs, and SOEs in regions with a poorer institutional environment have higher leverage ratios than SOEs in better regions. We also show that the largest shareholding (the percentage of shares held by the largest shareholder) in the SOEs has a negative relationship with the leverage ratio, while the largest shareholding in non-SOEs has a non-linear relationship with the short-term and long-term debt ratios. Finally, this study also shows that the share split reform and the improvement of institutional environment both weaken the negative relationship and strengthen the positive relationship between largest shareholding and leverage of SOEs and non-SOEs to some extent. This paper documents how the financing behaviour of SOEs is more influenced by government intervention, while the financing behaviour of non-SOEs is more market oriented.
Investment Incentives and Leverage: Evidence from China’s Accelerated Depreciation Policy

Lexin Zhao,Hongsheng Fang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13273

IF: 2

2022-01-01

World Economy

Abstract:Using a difference-in-differences (DID) approach, this paper evaluates the effects of China's accelerated depreciation policy on corporate leverage. We find that the policy significantly increases corporate total leverage, which is mainly driven by the increase in long-term leverage. Moreover, raising investment in fixed assets serves as the primary mediating channel through which the policy affects long-term leverage and thus, total leverage. Finally, the positive effects of the policy on leverage are primarily significant in firms that are not close to tax exhaustion, and firms that invest in long-lived assets.
Do State Tax Changes Affect Corporate Tax Aggressiveness? US Evidence

Dawei Jin,Hao Shen,Haizhi Wang,Desheng Yin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/par-09-2021-0156

2022-01-01

Pacific Accounting Review

Abstract:PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to empirically explore whether and to what extent the changes in state corporate income tax rates affect corporate tax aggressiveness.Design/methodology/approachUsing a differences-in-differences approach with dynamic treatment, the authors investigate the effect of staggered changes in state corporate income tax rates in the USA on corporate tax aggressiveness.FindingsFirms become more aggressive in avoiding taxes following state tax increases but are insensitive to tax cuts. The effect of state tax increases on tax aggressiveness is weaker for firms with greater debt tax shields and marginal tax rates. Firms are more likely to shift their operations and relocate their headquarters out of states experiencing tax increases.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors' knowledge, this paper is the first to study the relation between state tax policy changes and corporate tax aggressiveness. This paper finds an asymmetrical pattern of corporate tax aggressiveness in response to state tax changes.
Creditor Rights and LBOs

jerry cao,douglas j cumming,meijun qian,xiaoming wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1086775

2010-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper examines the relation between legal conditions and leveraged buyouts (LBOs) in 49 countries. The data indicate that sophisticated PE fund managers carrying out large international LBOs can only partially mitigate costs associated with inefficient legal protections. LBOs are more active in countries with strong creditor rights. Club deals are more likely to occur in countries with weak creditor rights. Cross-border LBO investment is more common from strong creditor rights countries to weak creditor rights countries. Premiums offered to shareholders are on average negatively correlated with creditor rights for both domestic and cross-border LBOs.
Value-Added Tax and Corporate Tax Burden: Evidence from China’s Value-Added Tax Rate Reform

Xiufen Liu,Hongsheng Fang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s021759082250059x

2022-01-01

Abstract:China introduced the value-added tax (VAT) rate reform in 2017 to reduce the burden on firms and stimulate the economy. This study builds a simple theoretical framework and employs the 2017 VAT rate reform as a quasi-natural experiment to evaluate the effects of the VAT rate reform on the corporate tax burden. We find that the VAT rate reform significantly reduces the corporate total tax burden by 9.1% (an effect mainly driven by the decrease in the VAT burden), while the reform has no significant impact on enterprise income tax burden. Furthermore, the effects of VAT reduction on the corporate tax burden are primarily significant in firms with lower intermediate input ratios, firms facing lower market monopolies, firms from eastern China and firms with high-fixed assets.
Corporate Tax, Capital Structure, and the Accessibility of Bank Loans: Evidence from China

Liansheng Wu,Heng Yue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.10.030

IF: 3.539

2009-01-01

Journal of Banking & Finance

Abstract:In this paper, we investigate whether listed firms in China adjust their capital structure in response to an increase in the corporate tax rate. Although theories of capital structure suggest that corporate tax is an important determinant of capital structure, how exogenous changes of the tax rate affect firms’ leverage decisions has not been fully explored. We examine a unique circumstance in which the Chinese government increased the corporate tax rate of firms that had previously received local government tax rebates. The evidence indicates that these firms increased their leverage when the corporate tax rate increased. Further investigation suggests that the adjustment of leverage was mostly driven by firms with a high level of access to bank loans.
State Corporate Tax Changes and Bond Pricing: U.S. Evidence

Hong Zhao,Hao Shen,Haizhi Wang,Yun Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103057

IF: 8.235

2023-01-01

International Review of Financial Analysis

Abstract:In this study, we empirically investigate whether and to what extent state tax changes may affect the cost of debt. We employ staggered changes in state corporate income tax rates in the U.S. as exogenous shocks and estimate the effects of these state tax changes on bond at-issue yield spreads. We find a significant and positive relation between bond yield spreads and state tax increases but an insignificant relation between bond yield spreads and state tax decreases. On average, tax increases result in an increase of 34 basis points in the average bond yield spread. In addition, we document that bond investors demand higher yield spreads because tax increases aggravate firms' default risk by increasing firm leverage and return volatility. Moreover, we extend our analysis to equity holders and report a negative relation between stock market reaction to bond issuances subject to state tax increases.
Deleveraging, Tax and Corporate Policies

Li Huang,Oliver Zhen Li,Huan Liu,Chenkai Ni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3831732

2021-01-01

Abstract:Exploiting a government-initiated deleveraging program, we investigate how marginal corporate tax rate affects corporate policy changes in response to a credit shock. We find that, after the initiation of China’s 2015 deleveraging program, high-tax-rate firms reduce leverage to a less extent compared with low-tax-rate firms. This effect is stronger in non-state-owned firms and firms with less non-debt tax shields. High-tax-rate firms reduce dividend and switch to equity financing to a less extent. Through retaining more debt, high-tax-rate firms cut less investments in fixed assets, R&D and human capital. With this unique deleveraging setting, we reveal important implications of the tax-leverage link for corporate policies.
Ownership Structure and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Agency Costs of State Ownership in China

Mark T Bradshaw,Guanmin Liao,Mark Ma,Mark Thomas Bradshaw,Mark (Shuai) Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2239837

2013-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:In state owned enterprises (SOEs), taxes are a dividend to the controlling shareholder, the state, but a cost to other shareholders. We examine publicly traded firms in China and find significantly lower tax avoidance by SOEs relative to non-SOEs. The differences are pronounced for locally versus centrally-owned SOEs and during the year of SOE term performance evaluations. We link our results to managerial incentives through promotion tests, finding that higher SOE tax rates are associated with higher promotion frequencies of SOE managers. Our results suggest managerial incentives and tax reporting are conditional on the ownership structure of the firm.
State Ownership,Preferential Tax,and Corporate Tax Burdens

Wu Liansheng

2009-01-01

Abstract:The relationship between state ownership and firm value is one of the most important issues in the fields of economics,finance and accounting.Extant literature examined it from the perspective of corporate performance,but hasn't got a conclusion that is widely accepted.One of the main reasons is that the detailed channel through which state ownership affects firm value hasn't been examined.Tax payment is just one of the channels.Little research has examined the relationship between state ownership and firm value from the perspective of corporate tax burden,and tax status hasn't been taken into account.This paper examined the effects of state ownership and preferential tax on corporate tax burdens.It shows that corporate tax burden increased with state ownership,and state ownership brought heavier tax burdens to firms without preferential tax rate than firms with preferential tax rate.The conclusion has implications to the reform of state-owned companies,the tax levy of tax authority and investors' decisions.
Do Share Repurchases Facilitate Movement Toward Target Capital Structure? International Evidence

Zigan Wang,Qie Ellie Yin,Luping Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2024.101498

IF: 3.025

2024-03-30

Journal of Empirical Finance

Abstract:We use a new international setting to test and strengthen identification of the "target leverage" hypothesis in the payout policy literature. We conduct a quasi-natural experiment induced by staggered share repurchase legalization in 17 economies and analyze its influences on leverage dynamics. After controlling for other repurchasing motives, firms under-leveraged before legalization are more likely to buy back shares immediately after legalization. Post-legalization repurchases also facilitate firms' movement toward target leverage, especially when firms are under-leveraged. This facilitating effect is stronger under lower repurchasing restriction, higher dividend tax penalty, and lower financial constraint.

economics,business, finance
Controlling Shareholders’ Incentive and Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Natural Experiment in China

Oliver Zhen Li,Hang Liu,Chenkai Ni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12243

2017-04-06

Journal of Business Finance and Accounting

Abstract:Abstract The split share structure reform removes a significant market friction in China's capital market by allowing previously non‐tradable shares to be freely tradable at market prices. Such a reform reduces the agency conflict between controlling shareholders and minority shareholders as the former now care more about stock prices. We find that state‐owned firms, but not non‐state‐owned firms, significantly increased their tax avoidance activities after the reform. We attribute this differential effect to the dual role of the government as state‐owned firms’ controlling shareholder as well as the tax claimant. Further, this effect is more pronounced for state‐owned firms that are more likely to be influenced by the government prior to the reform. Finally, the reform reinforces a positive association between tax avoidance and firm value. Overall, our study suggests that when controlling shareholders are more concerned about stock prices, state‐owned firms engage more in tax avoidance activities to enhance firm value.

business, finance
Ownership Nature of Ultimate Controller, Debt-related Tax Shields and Capital Structure

Wang Yuetang,Wang Liangliang,Peng Yang

2010-01-01

Abstract:Institution is an important factor of capital structure. Most listed firms in the Chinese market are controlled directly or indirectly by the state, which provides a unique opportunity to study capital structure theory. Corporate income tax reform was introduced in 2008. We firstly study the effect of the exogenous corporate income tax law change on capital structure. Based on this, we further study the effect of different ownership nature of Ultimate Controller on the relation between debt-related tax shields and capital structure. The results of empirical tests suggest: After the tax reform, firms with tax rate reduced during the tax reform significantly decrease the debt level, but firms with tax rate increased during the tax reform significantly raise the debt level; "Investment-related tax shields" has a negative relation with capital structure, which supports "substitution effect". Further study based on ownership nature of ultimate controller suggests: Non-state-owned firms raise the debt level much more than state-owned firms in firms with tax rate increased during the tax reform, and Non-state-owned firms decrease the debt level much more than state-owned firms in firms with tax rate reduced during the tax reform. The results suggest that non-state-owned firms are more aggressive than state-owned firms. Our paper not only support the traditional theory on debt-related tax shields, but also find ownership nature of ultimate controller has effect on tax shields. Apart from this, our results reveal the effect of corporate income tax reform on firms’ capital structure.
Investment Income Taxes and Private Equity Acquisition Activity

Alex Holcomb,Paul Mason,Harold H. Zhang,Harold Huibing Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3251978

2018-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Utilizing a novel identification strategy, we uncover evidence that investment income tax rate reductions increase acquisition activity of private equity acquirers. Applying a difference-in-difference methodology, we find that acquisitions sponsored by private equity firms nearly doubled following the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003. We attribute our findings to private equity firms' ability to capture the benefit of lower capital gains tax rates. These findings are robust to considering target shareholders' tax incentives as well as firm, industry, and macroeconomic factors possibly influencing acquisition activity.
Tax Shelters, Reputational Costs and CEO Turnover: Evidence from Tax-Violating Enterprises in China

Na Wang,Liangliang Wang,Lirong Zhang,Yin Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2020.1768070

2020-01-01

Emerging Markets Finance and Trade

Abstract:This paper investigates whether executives will bear reputational costs as a result of using tax shelters within different ownership structures. Based on tax-violation events of Chinese listed firms, we find that CEOs in state-owned enterprises are more likely to bear reputational costs than CEOs in non-state-owned enterprises and that the penalty on executives always occurs in the current year rather than in the subsequent year. In addition, the individual reputational cost of tax avoidance is related to tax aggressiveness and regulatory punishment. The more severe the tax aggressiveness or the regulatory punishment is, the greater the reputational cost of tax avoidance is for CEOs in SOEs. Our findings not only provide direct empirical evidence for the research on the corporate reputational costs of tax avoidance in an agency framework, but they also have great significance for understanding "the Under-Sheltering Puzzle."
State Ownership, Tax Status and Size Effect of Effective Tax Rate in China

Liansheng Wu,Yaping Wang,Wei Luo,Paul Gillis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2012.628208

IF: 2.326

2012-01-01

Accounting and Business Research

Abstract:Political cost theory and political power theory are two views on the effect of firm size on effective tax rate (ETR) in extant literature. The size effect of ETR can be investigated further by focusing on the relationship between firms and the government. This paper uses state ownership and tax status to capture this relationship and examines how firm size, state ownership and tax status jointly affect effective tax rates. It is found that, when firms do not enjoy a preferential tax status, firm size is positively associated with effective tax rates for privately controlled firms and negatively associated for state-controlled firms. The results show that political cost theory explains the relationship between size and effective tax rate for privately controlled firms, whereas political power theory explains this relationship for state-controlled firms. For those firms that already enjoy a preferential tax status, there is no significant relationship between their size and their tax burdens.
Do as I Say, Not as I Do: Tax Avoidance by State-Owned Firms

Ruiyuan Chen,Sadok El Ghoul,Omrane Guedhami,Robert C. Nash,Yang Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4680332

2024-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper investigates the impact of state ownership on corporate tax policies. We use a sample of 1,731 privatized firms from 48 countries and find that firms with higher residual state ownership tend to avoid more taxes. Consistent with the “Grabbing Hand” view, which posits that expropriating, state-controlled insiders use tax avoidance to mask rent extraction, we identify that the positive relationship is stronger for firms with weaker corporate governance. In contrast, we do not find substantial supporting evidence for the “Helping Hand” view, which holds that governments use tax policy to provide financial assistance to state-owned firms.
Taxation and Corporate Risk-Taking

Dominika Langenmayr,Rebecca Lester

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2460931

2014-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We study whether the corporate tax system provides incentives for risky firm investment. We analytically and empirically show two main findings: first, risk-taking is positively related to the length of tax loss periods because the loss rules shift some risk to the government; and second, the tax rate has a positive effect on risk-taking for firms that expect to use losses, and a weak negative effect for those that cannot. Thus, the sign of the tax effect on risky investment hinges on firm-specific expectations of future loss recovery.
Growth Opportunities, Knowledge Capital, and Leverage: Evidence from US Biotech Firms

Qiao Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.248908

2000-01-01

Abstract:This paper investigates the interaction among a firm's knowledge capital, growth opportunities, earning dynamics, and optimal leverage level. Under the corporate taxation and personal taxation framework, by assuming that knowledge capital positively affects the realization of a firm's growth opportunities, I find a positive relation between a firm's optimal debt level and its knowledge capital. Meanwhile, I identify a negative relation between R&D expenditures and leverage in the presence of better measures for a firm's knowledge capital. By using the data collected for US biotech firms, I find that firms' debt ratios are indeed positively related to their knowledge capital measures: citation-weighted patent counts or claim-weighted patent counts. Furthermore, by empolying an event study approach, I find a firm tends to increase its leverage ratio after the enhancement of its knowledge capital.
Value‐added Tax and Leverage: Evidence from China's Value‐added Tax Rate Reform

Hongsheng Fang,Lexin Zhao,Xiufen Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12529

IF: 2.451

2024-03-15

China & World Economy

Abstract:China &World Economy, Volume 32, Issue 2, Page 200-234, March-April 2024.

economics

State Tax Rate Changes and Leveraged Buyouts: US Evidence

The Effect of Ownership Structure on Leverage Decision: New Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Investment Incentives and Leverage: Evidence from China’s Accelerated Depreciation Policy

Do State Tax Changes Affect Corporate Tax Aggressiveness? US Evidence

Creditor Rights and LBOs

Value-Added Tax and Corporate Tax Burden: Evidence from China’s Value-Added Tax Rate Reform

Corporate Tax, Capital Structure, and the Accessibility of Bank Loans: Evidence from China

State Corporate Tax Changes and Bond Pricing: U.S. Evidence

Deleveraging, Tax and Corporate Policies

Ownership Structure and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Agency Costs of State Ownership in China

State Ownership,Preferential Tax,and Corporate Tax Burdens

Do Share Repurchases Facilitate Movement Toward Target Capital Structure? International Evidence

Controlling Shareholders’ Incentive and Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Natural Experiment in China

Ownership Nature of Ultimate Controller, Debt-related Tax Shields and Capital Structure

Investment Income Taxes and Private Equity Acquisition Activity

Tax Shelters, Reputational Costs and CEO Turnover: Evidence from Tax-Violating Enterprises in China

State Ownership, Tax Status and Size Effect of Effective Tax Rate in China

Do as I Say, Not as I Do: Tax Avoidance by State-Owned Firms

Taxation and Corporate Risk-Taking

Growth Opportunities, Knowledge Capital, and Leverage: Evidence from US Biotech Firms

Value‐added Tax and Leverage: Evidence from China's Value‐added Tax Rate Reform