Abstract:Purpose This study aims to examine the association between related-party transactions (RPT) and tax avoidance. The study further investigates whether government ownership improves scrutiny of tax aggressiveness activities among Taiwanese group companies. Design/methodology/approach The authors used 16,061 firm-year observations derived from the Taiwan Economic Journal Database (TEJ) from 2005 to 2021. The authors applied GLS fixed-effect regression. Additional tests, such as a difference-in-difference examination, propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and other tests were performed to obtain more robust results. Findings The results show different consequences between eliminated and non-eliminated RPT toward tax avoidance. RPT enhances tax benefits aligned with the efficient contracting hypothesis. Under varying degrees of government control, this paper empirically reveals that government ownership has a role in mitigating tax avoidance. This implies that government control improves corporate governance by balancing opportunistic and efficiency-based tax avoidance. Practical implications This paper provides substantial practical implications since using the strategy of reducing taxes through RPT will result in greater tax savings at the business group level. Therefore, RPT is beneficial for enhancing business efficiency. Furthermore, government control increases corporate governance quality, which could lead to balancing tax aggressiveness activity. Originality/value Using a unique setting for RPT reporting in Taiwan, this paper divides RPT into eliminated and non-eliminated RPT. The findings offer significant insight for policymakers, investors and managers regarding the utilization of RPT to enhance efficiency in business groups. Additionally, this paper highlights the role of government control in preserving a harmonious balance in tax planning practices.

Do as I Say, Not as I Do: Tax Avoidance by State-Owned Firms

Ownership Structure and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Agency Costs of State Ownership in China

Multiple Large Shareholders, Identity, and Corporate Tax Avoidance

Government Ownership and Corporate Tax Evasion: Evidence from China

Do Non‐SOEs Engage in Less Tax Avoidance When the Government Is a Minority Shareholder in China?

Privatization, tunneling, and tax avoidance in Chinese SOEs

What Types of Publicly Listed Firms Evade Taxes? Evidence from China

Ownership structure and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from publicly listed private firms in China

How Does Corporate Governance Affect Tax Avoidance? Evidence from China

Corporate Tax Avoidance and Government Corruption: Evidence from Chinese Firms

Firm Ownership Changes and Tax Compliance: Evidence from China's SOE Reform

State Ownership,Preferential Tax,and Corporate Tax Burdens

The Impact of Institutional Cross‐ownership on Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Controlling Shareholders’ Incentive and Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Natural Experiment in China

Related party transactions and tax avoidance: does government ownership play a role?

Mixed ownership reform and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence of Chinese listed firms

Impact of Executive Compensation Incentives on Corporate Tax Avoidance

Bribe Payments and State Ownership: the Impact of State Ownership on Bribery Propensity and Intensity

Agency Costs and Tax Planning when the Government is a Major Shareholder

Evidence on Aggressive Tax Avoidance by German State-Owned Enterprises and its Driving Factors

The Political Dynamics of Corporate Tax Avoidance: The Chinese Experience