Abstract:Objective To evaluate the value of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) suspicious targeted biopsy in the biopsy of prostate cancer.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in 181 patients with suspected prostate cancer underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy from September 2011 to September 2013 in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine.In all the 181 patients had the transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy,116 patients with suspicious MRI had two additional targeted biopsies.Prostate cancers were detected in 97 of 181 patients,and the prostatic hyperplasia were detected in 84 patients.The detection rate of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy,suspicious MRI targeted biopsy and combined biopsy in prostate cancer were tested by χ2 test.Compared with pathological results,the sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy and suspicious MRI targeted biopsy were calculated and tested by χ2 test.Results Prostate cancer was detected in 97 of 181 patients(53.6%),63(34.8%) was detected by transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy,and 81(44.8%) was detected by suspicious MRI targeted biopsy.The suspicious MRI targeted biopsy detected more prostate cancers which there had statistical differences compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy(χ2=34.830,P=0.015).Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate systematic biopsy missed 34 cases of prostate cancer,and suspicious MRI targeted biopsy missed 16 cases,accounting for 35.1%(34/97) and 16.5%(16/97) of prostate cancer.The 181 patients were biopsied a total of 1 896 cores,including transrectal ultrasound guided systematic biopsy 1 448 cores and suspicious MRI targeted biopsy 448 cores.The sensitivity,specifi city,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of suspicious MRI targeted biopsy was 89.8%(280/312),87.4%(1 384/1 584),58.3%(280/480),97.7%(1 384/1 416) compared with the sensitivity of 71.8%(224/312),specifi city of 22.7%(360/1 584),positive predictive value of 15.5%(224/1 448) and negative predictive value of 80.4%(360/448) in transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy(χ2=14.008,96.037,143.049,170.729,all P < 0.001).Conclusions The detection rate of prostate cancer of suspicious MRI targeted biopsy is higher than transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy,but can′t replace transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy.The two methods are complementary to improve the prostate cancer detection rate.

A Meta-analysis of safety comparison between perineal and transrectal prostate biopsy guided by color ultrasound

A comparative evaluation of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy in safety

Comparison between Ultrasound Guided Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Trial

Transperineal Versus Transrectal Prostate Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The value of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy and additional targeted cores from suspicious magnetic resonance imaging in the biopsy of prostate cancer

Comparison of Value Between Transperineal Template Guided Biopsy and Transrectal Biopsy

Ultrasound-guided transperineal vs transrectal prostate biopsy: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and complication rates

A novel simplified transperineal prostate biopsy guided by perineal ultrasound

The Results of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Prostate Biopsy： a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Assessment the security of the prostate biopsy guided by tansrectal ultrasound

A Comparative Study of Transrectal Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Assisted Prostate Biopsy and System-Ic Prostate Biopsy

[Transperineal versus transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in detection of clinically significant and insignificant prostate cancer: A prospective randomized controlled trial]

Comparison of the Complications of Traditional 12 Cores Transrectal Prostate Biopsy with Image Fusion Guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.

The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate extension biopsy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

The Efficiency and Safety of Intrarectal Topical Anesthesia for Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Study on perineal prostatic puncture under three-plane long needle and four-point location an-esthesia

Clinical Significance of Prostate Biopsy with Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Through the Perineum

Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Following Transrectal and Transperineal Biopsy: Results of the Prostate Biopsy Efficacy and Complications Randomized Clinical Trial

The Comparative Study on the Application Value of Transperineal Prostate Combined Biopsy and Transrectal Prostate Systematic Biopsy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer in Patients with Different PSA Zones.

Clinical value of ultrasound-guided full-needle path anesthesia in transperineal prostate biopsy: An observational study

Transperineal magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy versus transrectal route in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis