A comparative evaluation of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy in safety

Peixini Zhang,Hongliang Jia,Aniwan,Chunlin Pu,Jiansen Chen,Bin Wen,Ming Li,Yun Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-5146.2016.05.007
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the safety between ultrasound-guided transrectal (TR) and transperineal (TP) approaches in prostate biopsy for prostate cancer detection.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 780 consecutive suspected prostate cancer patients initially given ultrasound-guided transrectal (n=412) and trasperineal (n=368) prostate biopsy,and the biopsy results and post-biopsy complications were compared between TR and TP.Results: The positive incidence in TR and TP groups was not significantly different (P=0.846).The age,prostate volume,PSA value,body mass index and digital examination between two groups showed no significant difference,and there was significant difference in operation time between two groups.The positive incidence between two groups according to PSA valus (PSA≤10 μg/L or >10 μg/L) was not significantly different.The positive incidence between two groups was significantly different while the prostate volume was greater than 50 mL.The complication rate in pain,hematuria,hematochezia,fever and bacteriaemia between two groups was significantly different.Conclusions: TR and TP are safe and effective for the diagnosis of prostate tumour,owing to the comparative tumor detection rate and few complication rate,and the option between TR and TP in clinical practice depends on the certain circumstances of each patient.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?