Abstract:Background and objective High-resolution micro-ultrasound (microUS) is an advanced imaging tool. Our objective was to determine whether systematic microUS use for transrectal biopsy (TRBx) improves the detection rate for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in comparison to transperineal biopsy (TPBx) performed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion software. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data for men who underwent prostate biopsies, including those on active surveillance (AS). TRBx was performed under microUS guidance, while MRI/TRUS fusion was consistently used to guide TPBx. Patients were matched according to propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was comparison of the csPCa detection rate with the two approaches. Secondary endpoints included predictors of csPCa (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2, assessed via multivariable logistic regression) and complication rates. Key findings and limitations Overall, 1423 patients were enrolled. After applying PSM we identified an analytical cohort of 1094 men, 582 in the TRBx group and 512 in the TPBx group. There was no significant difference in the csPCa detection rate between the TRBx (45%) and TPBx (51%) groups ( p = 0.07). Complications occurred in nine of 1094 patients (1%). On adjusted multivariable analysis, TPBx had a similar csPCa detection rate to TRBx (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.26; p = 0.09). Predictors of csPCa detection were a positive family history (aOR 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20–2.35; p = 0.002); age (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02–1.06; p < 0.001); positive digital rectal examination (aOR 2.35, 95% CI 1.70–3.25; p < 0.001); prostate-specific antigen density ≥0.15 ng/ml/cm 3 (aOR 3.23, 95% CI 2.47–4.23; p < 0.001); and a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score ≥3 (aOR 2.46; 95% CI 1.83–3.32; p < 0.001). Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study, the risk of underestimating the complication rate, and the heterogeneity of biopsy indications. Conclusions and clinical implications TRBx using microUS alone showed a comparable csPCa detection rate to TPBx guided by MRI/TRUS fusion software. Given the better visualization and real-time detection of suspicious zones with microUS, the potential for improvement in the csPCa detection rate with greater integration of microUS in the TPBx setting warrants further investigation. Patient summary We compared the ability of two different prostate biopsy approaches to detect clinically significant prostate cancer. We found that transrectal biopsy guided by micro-ultrasound had similar detection rates to transperineal biopsy guided by a combination of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional ultrasound. More research is needed to confirm the potential of micro-ultrasound for transperineal biopsy.

Management of two dislocated posterior chamber lenses in eyes with pseudoexfoliation

A comparative evaluation of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy in safety

[Transperineal versus transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in detection of clinically significant and insignificant prostate cancer: A prospective randomized controlled trial]

Shifting to transperineal prostate biopsy: A narrative review

Indications, Strategies, and Development on Prostate Targeted Biopsy: Report of the Panjiayuan Consensus Conference 2022

Ultrasound-guided transperineal vs transrectal prostate biopsy: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and complication rates

Comparison of the Complications of Traditional 12 Cores Transrectal Prostate Biopsy with Image Fusion Guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.

A Propensity Score–matched Comparison of Micro-ultrasound–guided Transrectal and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsies for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

Individualized regimen for transperineal prostate biopsy: an experience with 1044 cases

Comparison of Value Between Transperineal Template Guided Biopsy and Transrectal Biopsy

Randomized trial of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy to prevent infection complications.

Injection of Autologous Muscle Stem Cells (Myoblasts) for the Treatment of Vocal Fold Paralysis: A Pilot Study

Transperineal Versus Transrectal Prostate Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy for cancer detection in patients with gray-zone prostate-specific antigen: a multicenter, real-world study

The influence of temperature, pH, and water immersion on the high hydrostatic pressure inactivation of GI.1 and GII.4 human noroviruses.

Comparison of transperineal and transrectal biopsy approaches to detect clinically significant prostate cancer in patients undergoing MRI fusion prostate biopsy: A lesion level analysis.

Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China

The Role of Freehand Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia Without Antibiotics in Outpatient Settings

The Comparative Study on the Application Value of Transperineal Prostate Combined Biopsy and Transrectal Prostate Systematic Biopsy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer in Patients with Different PSA Zones.

Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Approach in Men Undergoing Kidney Transplant: A Retrospective Cohort Study at Three Referral Academic Centers

Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Final Results of the Randomized PERFECT trial (CCAFU-PR1)