Abstract:Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the functional optical zone (FOZ) after correction of high myopic astigmatism and low myopic astigmatism by small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods In this prospective study, 30 patients who received SMILE for high myopic astigmatism correction (cylinderical diopters ≤ − 2.0D) were enrolled in the high astigmatism group (HA). The control group comprised 40 patients who underwent SMILE for low myopic astigmatism correction (LA; cylinderical diopters ≥ − 0.5D). FOZ was delineated as the area outlined by a change of 0.5D relative to the power at the corneal vertex on the total corneal refractive power map. An ellipse-fitting program (MatLab) was used to calculate some parameters of the FOZ. Visual quality evaluations were also conducted, including evaluations of wavefront aberrations, optical quality, and intraocular scattering, and completion of a quality of life questionnaire. All of the right eyes were analyzed in the study. Results The preoperative average treatment spherical equivalent (− 5.77 ± 1.86D vs. − 6.49 ± 1.49D; P = 0.074), lenticule thickness (120.87 ± 23.27 μm vs. 118.53 ± 21.66 μm; P = 0.666), and programmed optical zone (6.58 ± 0.17 mm vs. 6.65 ± 0.18 mm; P = 0.104) were comparable between the HA and LA groups. The long axes (6.99 ± 1.14 mm vs. 5.32 ± 0.61 mm; P < 0.001), short axes (4.66 ± 0.96 mm vs. 4.23 ± 0.64 mm; P = 0.047), and area (25.90 ± 8.03 mm 2 vs. 17.92 ± 4.36 mm 2 ; P < 0.001) of the FOZ were significantly larger in the HA group than in the LA group. The centration of the FOZ were comparable between the two groups (0.62 ± 0.25 mm vs. 0.70 ± 0.25 mm; P = 0.194). Postoperative spherical aberration was lower in the HA group than in the LA group (0.07 ± 0.05 μm vs. 0.14 ± 0.10 μm; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the ocular scatter index (0.80 ± 0.46 vs. 0.73 ± 0.46; P = 0.447), modulated transfer function (MTF) cutoff (37.89 ± 9.79 cpd vs. 39.78 ± 7.45 cpd; P = 0.363), and Strehl in two dimensions (Strehl2D) ratio (0.20 ± 0.04 vs. 0.20 ± 0.04; P = 0.363) between the HA group and the LA group. There were no significant differences in the scores on quality of life between the HA and LA groups (45.88 ± 2.15 vs. 45.64 ± 1.84; P = 0.423). Correlation analysis revealed that increase in the spherical aberration was significantly correlated with the long axes, short axes and area in the FOZ in both groups. Conclusion With a comparable optical design and attempted correction in SMILE, the eyes with higher myopic astigmatism correction achieved larger FOZ than the eyes with lower myopic astigmatism correction. Consequently, less spherical aberration induction was created after higher myopic astigmatism correction. This result may be associated with less corneal volume sculpted by laser for the higher astigmatism treatment, leading to fewer biochemical responses and les change in corneal aspherity. Good retinal image quality and satisfied quality of life were achieved at a comparable level in both study groups.

Effective Optical Zone Following Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Calculated with Two Novel Methods

Effective Optical Zone and Centration Following SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia Calculated With a Novel Method

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond-Assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis in Patients with Deep Corneal Opacity: Case Series.

Study on the Effective Optical Zone after SMILE in Patients with Different Degrees of Myopia

Influence of optical zone on myopic correction in small incision lenticule extraction: a short-term study

Comparison of long-term changes in the effective optical zone following SMILE and FS-LASIK for moderate and high myopia

Comparison of the effective optical zone after small incision lenticule extraction measured by corneal topography and modulation transfer function in myopia

Effective Optical Zone Following Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: a Review.

Corneal Power Distribution and Functional Optical Zone Following Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia.

Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Comparison of Functional Optical Zone, and Visual Quality After SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia

Achieved and Functional Optical Zone in Myopic Eyes with High Astigmatism after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Functional Optical Zone and Visual Quality After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for High Myopic Astigmatism

Comparison of the Functional Optical Zone in Eyes with High Myopia with High Astigmatism after SMILE and FS-LASIK.

Functional Optical Zone after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction As Stratified by Attempted Correction and Optical Zone

Comparison of Optical Zone Decentration Following FS-LIKE and SMI-LIKE for Correcting Hyperopia

Comparison of femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopic astigmatism

Functional optical zone and visual quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK treatment for high myopia

Predictability of the Achieved Lenticule Thickness in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Correction.

Effect Of A 2-Mm Incision On Keratometry And Visual Quality After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction

Refractive Outcomes Comparing Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction And Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis For High Myopia

Changes in posterior corneal elevation after small incision lenticule extraction for different myopic diopters