Abstract:Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the screening performance of COPD-PS questionnaire, COPD-SQ questionnaire, peak expiratory flow (PEF), COPD-PS questionnaire combined with PEF, and COPD-SQ questionnaire combined with PEF for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods This was a cross-sectional study. We distributed self-designed surveys and COPD screening scales (COPD-PS questionnaire and COPD-SQ questionnaire) to residents who underwent physical examination in five community health centers in Haicang District, Xiamen City, from February 2023 to May 2023, and measured their lung function and PEF with a portable device. We used logistic regression to obtain the coefficients of COPD-PS questionnaire, COPD-SQ questionnaire, and PEF, and plotted the receiver operating characteristic curves of each tool for diagnosing COPD and moderate-to-severe COPD. We evaluated and compared the optimal cut-off points and scores of sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, and area under the curve (AUC) values, and assessed the screening efficiency of different methods. Results Of the 3,537 residents who completed the COPD-SQ questionnaire, COPD-PS questionnaire, and spirometry, 840 were diagnosed with COPD. We obtained the coefficients of COPD-PS questionnaire combined with peak expiratory flow (PEF), and COPD-SQ questionnaire combined with PEF, by logistic regression as −0.479-0.358 × PEF +0.321 × COPD-PS score and − 1.286-0.315 × PEF +0.125 × COPD-SQ score, respectively. The sensitivity of diagnosing COPD by COPD-SQ questionnaire, COPD-PS questionnaire, PEF, COPD-PS questionnaire combined with PEF, and COPD-SQ questionnaire combined with PEF were 0.439, 0.586, 0.519, 0.586, 0.612 respectively, and the specificity were 0.725, 0.621, 0.688, 0.689, 0.663 respectively, with ROC values of 0.606 (95%CI: 0.586–0.626), 0.640 (0.619–0.661), 0.641 (0.619–0.663), 0.678 (0.657–0.699), 0.685 (0.664–0.706) respectively. The sensitivity of diagnosing GOLD II and above by COPD-SQ questionnaire, COPD-PS questionnaire, PEF, COPD-PS questionnaire combined with PEF, and COPD-SQ questionnaire combined with PEF were 0.489, 0.620, 0.665, 0.630, 0.781 respectively, and the specificity were 0.714, 0.603, 0.700, 0.811, 0.629 respectively, with ROC values of 0.631 (95%CI: 0.606–0.655), 0.653 (0.626–0.679), 0.753 (0.730–0.777), 0.784 (0.762–0.806), 0.766 (0.744–0.789) respectively. Conclusion Our study found that the accuracy of COPD screening by COPD-SQ questionnaire and COPD-PS questionnaire can be improved by combining the results of PEF. The screening performance of COPD-SQ questionnaire combined with PEF is relatively better. In future research, further studies are needed to optimize the performance of screening tools and understand whether their use will affect clinical outcomes.

Efficacy of a Self-Designed Questionnaire for Community Screening of COPD

Validation of COPD Population Screener Questionnaire in Chinese Population: A National Multicenter Study

Efficacy of different questionnaires in screening COPD in the communities of Songjiang District,Shanghai

Comparing the Performance of Two Screening Questionnaires for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Chinese General Population

Performance of COPD population screener questionnaire in COPD screening: a validation study and meta-analysis

Development and Validation of a Screening Questionnaire of COPD from a Large Epidemiological Study in China.

Screening performance of COPD-PS scale, COPD-SQ scale, peak expiratory flow, and their combinations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the primary healthcare in Haicang District, Xiamen City

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire 20 (Srq-20) in Community Settings

Preliminary Study of Symptom-Based Questionnaire for Identifying COPD in China

Comparison of Newly Diagnosed COPD Patients and the Non-Copd Residents in Shanghai Minhang District.

Questionnaires and pocket spirometers provide an alternative approach for COPD screening in the general population

Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying undiagnosed COPD among primary care patients (≥40 years) in China: a cross-sectional screening test accuracy study: findings from the Breathe Well group

Comparative Study on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Tools in Primary Healthcare Institutions in Beijing, China

The Application of Chinese Health Questionnaire for Mental Disorder Screening in Community Settings in Mainland China

[Evaluation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening in a High Risk Population].

Gender Difference on the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of COPD Diagnosis and Treatment: a National, Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Survey in China.

Developing and validating a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease quick screening questionnaire using statistical learning models

Agreement among Multiple Measures of Self-Reported Smoking Status in Chinese Urban Residents

Performance Management of COPD Control in Community

Preferred Lung Cancer Screening Modalities in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Validation And Clinical Interpretation Of The St George'S Respiratory Questionnaire Among Copd Patients, China