Abstract:Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the screening performance of COPD-PS questionnaire, COPD-SQ questionnaire, peak expiratory flow (PEF), COPD-PS questionnaire combined with PEF, and COPD-SQ questionnaire combined with PEF for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods This was a cross-sectional study. We distributed self-designed surveys and COPD screening scales (COPD-PS questionnaire and COPD-SQ questionnaire) to residents who underwent physical examination in five community health centers in Haicang District, Xiamen City, from February 2023 to May 2023, and measured their lung function and PEF with a portable device. We used logistic regression to obtain the coefficients of COPD-PS questionnaire, COPD-SQ questionnaire, and PEF, and plotted the receiver operating characteristic curves of each tool for diagnosing COPD and moderate-to-severe COPD. We evaluated and compared the optimal cut-off points and scores of sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, and area under the curve (AUC) values, and assessed the screening efficiency of different methods. Results Of the 3,537 residents who completed the COPD-SQ questionnaire, COPD-PS questionnaire, and spirometry, 840 were diagnosed with COPD. We obtained the coefficients of COPD-PS questionnaire combined with peak expiratory flow (PEF), and COPD-SQ questionnaire combined with PEF, by logistic regression as −0.479-0.358 × PEF +0.321 × COPD-PS score and − 1.286-0.315 × PEF +0.125 × COPD-SQ score, respectively. The sensitivity of diagnosing COPD by COPD-SQ questionnaire, COPD-PS questionnaire, PEF, COPD-PS questionnaire combined with PEF, and COPD-SQ questionnaire combined with PEF were 0.439, 0.586, 0.519, 0.586, 0.612 respectively, and the specificity were 0.725, 0.621, 0.688, 0.689, 0.663 respectively, with ROC values of 0.606 (95%CI: 0.586–0.626), 0.640 (0.619–0.661), 0.641 (0.619–0.663), 0.678 (0.657–0.699), 0.685 (0.664–0.706) respectively. The sensitivity of diagnosing GOLD II and above by COPD-SQ questionnaire, COPD-PS questionnaire, PEF, COPD-PS questionnaire combined with PEF, and COPD-SQ questionnaire combined with PEF were 0.489, 0.620, 0.665, 0.630, 0.781 respectively, and the specificity were 0.714, 0.603, 0.700, 0.811, 0.629 respectively, with ROC values of 0.631 (95%CI: 0.606–0.655), 0.653 (0.626–0.679), 0.753 (0.730–0.777), 0.784 (0.762–0.806), 0.766 (0.744–0.789) respectively. Conclusion Our study found that the accuracy of COPD screening by COPD-SQ questionnaire and COPD-PS questionnaire can be improved by combining the results of PEF. The screening performance of COPD-SQ questionnaire combined with PEF is relatively better. In future research, further studies are needed to optimize the performance of screening tools and understand whether their use will affect clinical outcomes.

Comparing the Performance of Two Screening Questionnaires for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Chinese General Population

Validation of COPD Population Screener Questionnaire in Chinese Population: A National Multicenter Study

Screening performance of COPD-PS scale, COPD-SQ scale, peak expiratory flow, and their combinations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the primary healthcare in Haicang District, Xiamen City

Performance of COPD population screener questionnaire in COPD screening: a validation study and meta-analysis

Efficacy of a Self-Designed Questionnaire for Community Screening of COPD

Efficacy of different questionnaires in screening COPD in the communities of Songjiang District,Shanghai

Comparative Study on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Tools in Primary Healthcare Institutions in Beijing, China

Comparison of Newly Diagnosed COPD Patients and the Non-Copd Residents in Shanghai Minhang District.

Development and Validation of a Screening Questionnaire of COPD from a Large Epidemiological Study in China.

Preliminary Study of Symptom-Based Questionnaire for Identifying COPD in China

Questionnaires and pocket spirometers provide an alternative approach for COPD screening in the general population

[Evaluation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening in a High Risk Population].

Feasibility and performance of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population screener and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening questionnaire in a Chinese physical examination center

Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying undiagnosed COPD among primary care patients (≥40 years) in China: a cross-sectional screening test accuracy study: findings from the Breathe Well group

Comparison of Symptom and Risk Assessment Methods among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Developing and validating a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease quick screening questionnaire using statistical learning models

Pulmonary Function Influences the Performance of Berlin Questionnaire, Modified Berlin Questionnaire, and STOP-Bang Score for Screening Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical study on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosed by spirometry during physical checkup in the community

Performance Management of COPD Control in Community

Validation And Clinical Interpretation Of The St George'S Respiratory Questionnaire Among Copd Patients, China

The Construction of Primary Screening Model and Discriminant Model for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Northeast China