Abstract:No AccessEngineering NotesWarm Start for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization via Switched SystemDi Wu, Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng LiDi WuTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China*Ph.D. Candidate, School of Aerospace Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author, Fanghua JiangTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China†Associate Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; . Senior Member AIAA (Corresponding Author).Search for more papers by this author and Junfeng LiTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China‡Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; .Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:21 Jun 2021https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G005983SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Pan B., Pan X. and Lu P., “Finding Best Solution in Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization by Two-Phase Homotopy,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2019, pp. 283–291. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34144 LinkGoogle Scholar[2] Betts J. T., “Survey of Numerical Methods for Trajectory Optimization,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1998, pp. 193–207. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4231 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Ricciardi L. A. and Vasile M., “Direct Transcription of Optimal Control Problems with Finite Elements on Bernstein Basis,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2019, pp. 229–243. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003753 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Izzo D., Märtens M. and Pan B., “A Survey on Artificial Intelligence Trends in Spacecraft Guidance Dynamics and Control,” Astrodynamics, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2019, pp. 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-018-0053-6 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Englander J. A. and Conway B. A., “Automated Solution of the Low-Thrust Interplanetary Trajectory Problem,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2017, pp. 15–27. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002124 LinkGoogle Scholar[6] Conway B. A., “A Survey of Methods Available for the Numerical Optimization of Continuous Dynamic Systems,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 152, No. 2, 2012, pp. 271–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-011-9918-z CrossrefGoogle Scholar[7] Vasile M. and Bernelli-Zazzera F., “Optimizing Low-Thrust and Gravity Assist Maneuvers to Design Interplanetary Trajectories,” Journal of the astronautical sciences, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2003, pp. 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03546313 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Topputo F. and Zhang C., “Survey of Direct Transcription for Low-Thrust Space Trajectory Optimization with Applications,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, Vol. 2014, June 2014, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/851720 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Zuiani F., Vasile M., Palmas A. and Avanzini G., “Direct Transcription of Low-Thrust Trajectories with Finite Trajectory Elements,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 72, March 2012, pp. 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.09.011 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[10] Gondelach D. J. and Noomen R., “Hodographic-Shaping Method for Low-Thrust Interplanetary Trajectory Design,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2015, pp. 728–738. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A32991 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Roa J., Peláez J. and Senent J., “New Analytic Solution with Continuous Thrust: Generalized Logarithmic Spirals,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 10, 2016, pp. 2336–2351. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000341 LinkGoogle Scholar[12] Zhang C., Topputo F., Bernelli-Zazzera F. and Zhao Y.-S., “Low-Thrust Minimum-Fuel Optimization in the Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 8, 2015, pp. 1501–1510. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001080 LinkGoogle Scholar[13] Taheri E., Kolmanovsky I. and Atkins E., “Enhanced Smoothing Technique for Indirect Optimization of Minimum-Fuel Low-Thrust Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 11, 2016, pp. 2500–2511. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000379 LinkGoogle Scholar[14] Shen H.-X., “No-Guess Indirect Optimization of Asteroid Mission Using Electric Propulsion,” Optimal Control Applications and Methods, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2018, pp. 1061–1070. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.2396 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[15] Martinon P. and Gergaud J., “SHOOT2.0: An Indirect Grid Shooting Package for Optimal Control Problems, with Switching Handling and Embedded Continuation,” Inst. National de Recherche en Informatique et an Automatique Research Rept. RR-7380, France, Sept. 2010. Google Scholar[16] Taheri E. and Junkins J. L., “Generic Smoothing for Optimal Bang-Off-Bang Spacecraft Maneuvers,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 41, No. 11, 2018, pp. 2470–2475. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003604 LinkGoogle Scholar[17] Yang H., Li S. and Bai X., “Fast Homotopy Method for Asteroid Landing Trajectory Optimization Using Approximate Initial Costates,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2019, pp. 585–597. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003414 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Wu D., Cheng L. and Li J., “Warm-Start Multihomotopic Optimization for Low-Thrust Many-Revolution Trajectories,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 56, No. 6, 2020, pp. 4478–4490. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2020.2991704 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Jiang F., Tang G. and Li J., “Improving Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization by Adjoint Estimation with Shape-Based Path,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 12, 2017, pp. 3282–3289. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002803 LinkGoogle Scholar[20] Yildirim E. A. and Wright S. J., “Warm-Start Strategies in Interior-Point Methods for Linear Programming,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2002, pp. 782–810. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623400369235 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Koh K., Kim S.-J. and Boyd S., “An Interior-Point Method for Large-Scale l(1)-Regularized Logistic Regression,” Journal of Machine Learning Reaserch, Vol. 8, July 2007, pp. 1519–1555. https://doi.org/10.1.1.304.6478 Google Scholar[22] Bengea S. C. and DeCarlo R. A., “Optimal Control of Switching Systems,” Automatica, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2005, pp. 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2004.08.003 Google Scholar[23] Meng Y., Zhang H. and Gao Y., “Low-Thrust Minimum-Fuel Trajectory Optimization Using Multiple Shooting Augmented by Analytical Derivatives,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2019, pp. 662–677. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003473 LinkGoogle Scholar[24] Kitamura K., Yamada K. and Shima T., “Minimum Energy Coplanar Orbit Transfer of Geostationary Spacecraft Using Time-Averaged Hamiltonian,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 160, July 2019, pp. 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.04.033 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[25] Graham K. F. and Rao A. V., “Minimum-Time Trajectory Optimization of Multiple Revolution Low-Thrust Earth-Orbit Transfers,” Journal of spacecraft and rockets, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2015, pp. 711–727. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33187 LinkGoogle Scholar[26] D’Souza C., “An Optimal Guidance Law for Planetary Landing,” Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA Paper 1997-3709, Aug. 1997. Google Scholar[27] Haberkorn T., Martinon P. and Gergaud J., “Low Thrust Minimum-Fuel Orbital Transfer: A Homotopic Approach,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2004, pp. 1046–1060. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.4022 LinkGoogle Scholar[28] Mengali G. and Quarta A. A., “Fuel-Optimal, Power-Limited Rendezvous with Variable Thruster Efficiency,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 28, No. 6, 2005, pp. 1194–1199. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.12480 LinkGoogle Scholar[29] Quarta A. A., Izzo D. and Vasile M., “Time-Optimal Trajectories to Circumsolar Space Using Solar Electric Propulsion,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2013, pp. 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.09.012 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[30] Betts J. T., “Very Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization Using a Direct SQP Method,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 120, Nos. 1–2, 2000, pp. 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00301-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[31] Wang W., Wu D., Mengali G., Quarta A. A. and Baoyin H., “Asteroid Hovering Missions from a Fuel-Consumption Viewpoint,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 43, No. 7, 2020, pp. 1374–1382. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G005016 LinkGoogle Scholar[32] Quarta A. A., Mengali G. and Caruso A., “Optimal Circle-to-Rectilinear Orbit Transfer with Circumferential Thrust,” Astrodynamics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2019, pp. 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-018-0034-9 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[33] Jiang F., Baoyin H. and Li J., “Practical Techniques for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization with Homotopic Approach,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2012, pp. 245–258. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.52476 LinkGoogle Scholar[34] Zhao S., Gurfil P. and Zhang J., “Initial Costates for Low-Thrust Minimum-Time Station Change of Geostationary Satellites,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2016, pp. 2746–2756. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000431 LinkGoogle Scholar[35] Moré J. J., Garbow B. S. and Hillstrom K. E., “User Guide for MINPACK-1,” Argonne National Lab. Rept. ANL-80-74, Illinois, 1980. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[36] Powell M. J., “A Hybrid Method for Nonlinear Equations,” Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Algebraic Equations, Gordon and Breach, London, 1970, pp. 87–114. Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited bySolution space exploration of low-thrust minimum-time trajectory optimization by combining two homotopiesAutomatica, Vol. 148GTOC11: Methods and results from the team of Harbin Institute of TechnologyActa Astronautica, Vol. 202Atlas of Optimal Low-Thrust Rephasing Solutions in Circular OrbitDi Wu, Xiang Guo , Fanghua Jiang and Hexi Baoyin23 December 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 0, No. 0Optimal Projected Circular Orbit for Spacecraft Formation Flying Near a Slowly Rotating AsteroidIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 6Optimal Trajectory Design Accounting for Robust Stability of Path-Following ControllerPatrick Piprek , Haichao Hong and Florian Holzapfel 31 March 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Analytical Costate Estimation by a Reference Trajectory-Based Least-Squares MethodDi Wu, Lin Cheng , Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li31 March 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Analytical shaping method for low-thrust rendezvous trajectory using cubic spline functionsActa Astronautica, Vol. 193Efficient optimization method for variable-specific-impulse low-thrust trajectories with shutdown constraint7 February 2022 | Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 65, No. 3Minimum-time low-thrust many-revolution geocentric trajectories with analytical costates initializationAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 119 What's Popular Volume 44, Number 9September 2021 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2021 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3884 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsAerospace EngineeringAerospace SciencesAstrodynamicsAstronauticsBoundary Element MethodComputational Fluid DynamicsFluid DynamicsNumerical AnalysisOrbital ManeuversOrbital PropertySpace OrbitSpace Rendezvous KeywordsPontryagin's Maximum PrincipleThrustAerospace EngineeringPropellantEarthAsteroidsNonlinear ProgrammingInterplanetary MissionOrbital EccentricitySolution AlgorithmAcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 12022214 and 11902174).PDF Received10 February 2021Accepted5 May 2021Published online21 June 2021

Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteImproving Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization by Adjoint Estimation with Shape-Based PathFanghua Jiang, Gao Tang and Junfeng LiFanghua JiangTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China*Associate Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; . Senior Member AIAA (Corresponding Author).Search for more papers by this author, Gao TangTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China†Master’s Student, School of Aerospace Engineering; currently Ph.D. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Duke University; .Search for more papers by this author and Junfeng LiTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China‡Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; .Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:2 Aug 2017https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002803SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Hellín X. L., “Study of Earth-to-Mars Transfers with Low-Thrust Propulsion,” Polytechnic Univ. of Catalonia, School of Industrial and Aeronautical Engineering, Project Rept., Terrassa, Spain, Sept. 2011. Google Scholar[2] Betts J. T., “Survey of Numerical Methods for Trajectory Optimization,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1998, pp. 193–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4231 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Casalino L., “Approximate Optimization of Low-Thrust Transfers Between Low-Eccentricity Close Orbits,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2014, pp. 1003–1008. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.62046 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Gatto G. and Casalino L., “Fast Evaluation and Optimization of Low-Thrust Transfers to Multiple Targets,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 8, 2015, pp. 1525–1530. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001116 LinkGoogle Scholar[5] Zhao S. G., Gurfil P. and Zhang J. R., “Initial Costates for Low-Thrust Minimum-Time Station Change of Geostationary Satellites,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2016, pp. 2746–2756. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000431 LinkGoogle Scholar[6] Dixon L. C. W. and Biggs M. C., “The Advantages of Adjoint-Control Transformations When Determining Optimal Trajectories by Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle,” Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 76, No. 735, 1972, pp. 169–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000042731 Google Scholar[7] Russell R. P., “Primer Vector Theory Applied to Global Low-Thrust Trade Studies,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2007, pp. 460–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.22984 LinkGoogle Scholar[8] Guo T. D., Jiang F. H. and Li J. F., “Homotopic Approach and Pseudospectral Method Applied Jointly to Low Thrust Trajectory Optimization,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 71, Feb.–March 2012, pp. 38–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.08.008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Petropoulos A. E. and Longuski J. M., “Shape-Based Algorithm for the Automated Design of Low-Thrust, Gravity-Assist Trajectories,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2004, pp. 787–796. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.13095 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Wall B. J. and Conway B. A., “Shape-Based Approach to Low-Thrust Rendezvous Trajectory Design,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2009, pp. 95–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.36848 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Gondelach D. J. and Noomen R., “Hodographic-Shaping Method for Low-Thrust Interplanetary Trajectory Design,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2015, pp. 728–738. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A32991 LinkGoogle Scholar[12] Taheri E. and Abdelkhalik O., “Initial Three-Dimensional Low-Thrust Trajectory Design,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2016, pp. 889–903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.11.034 Google Scholar[13] Taheri E., Li N. I. and Kolmanovsky I., “Co-State Initialization for the Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 59, No. 9, 2017, pp. 2360–2373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.02.010 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Taheri E., Li N. I. and Kolmanovsky I., “Co-States Initialization of Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Trajectories Using Shape-Based Methods,” American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, July 2016, pp. 4053–4058. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2016.7525558 Google Scholar[15] Jiang F. H., Baoyin H. X. and Li J. F., “Practical Techniques for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization with Homotopic Approach,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2012, pp. 245–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.52476 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Tang G. and Jiang F. H., “Capture of Near-Earth Objects with Low-Thrust Propulsion and Invariant Manifolds,” Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 361, No. 1, 2016, Paper 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-015-2592-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Lewallen J. M., Schwausch O. A. and Tapley B. D., “Coordinate System Influence on the Regularized Trajectory Optimization Problem,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1971, pp. 15–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.30211 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Ranieri C. L. and Ocampo C. A., “Indirect Optimization of Spiral Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1360–1366. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19539 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] Jiang F. H. and Tang G., “Systematic Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization for a Multi-Rendezvous Mission Using Adjoint Scaling,” Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 361, No. 4, 2016, Paper 117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-016-2704-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Bertrand R. and Epenoy R., “New Smoothing Techniques for Solving Bang–Bang Optimal Control Problems Numerical Results and Statistical Interpretation,” Optimal Control Applications and Methods, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2002, pp. 171–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.709 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] More J. J., Garbow B. S. and Hillstrom K. E., “User Guide for MinPack-1,” Argonne National Lab. Rept. ANL-80-74, Lemont, IL, 1980; also https://github.com/devernay/cminpack [retrieved 10 Dec. 2012]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Novak D. M. and Vasile M., “Improved Shaping Approach to the Preliminary Design of Low-Thrust Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2011, pp. 128–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.50434 LinkGoogle Scholar[23] Xie C., Zhang G. and Zhang Y., “Shaping Approximation for Low-Thrust Trajectories with Large Out-of-Plane Motion,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2016, pp. 2780–2789. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001795 LinkGoogle Scholar[24] Popescu M., “Applications of Canonical Transformations in Optimizing Orbital Transfers,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1997, pp. 774–779. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4112 LinkGoogle Scholar[25] Wall B. J. and Novak D. M., “A 3D Shape-Based Approximation Method for Low-Thrust Trajectory Design,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 142, Jan. 2012, pp. 1163–1176; also American Astronomical Soc. Paper 11-479, 2011. Google Scholar[26] Kluever C. A., “Efficient Computation of Optimal Interplanetary Trajectories Using Solar Electric Propulsion,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2014, pp. 821–830. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000144 LinkGoogle Scholar[27] Taheri E., Kolmanovsky I. and Atkins E., “Enhanced Smoothing Technique for Indirect Optimization of Minimum-Fuel Low-Thrust Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 11, 2016, pp. 2500–2511. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000379 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byExploiting Scaling Constants to Facilitate the Convergence of Indirect Trajectory Optimization Methods12 February 2023 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 8GTOC 11: Results from Tsinghua University and Shanghai Institute of Satellite EngineeringActa Astronautica, Vol. 202Atlas of Optimal Low-Thrust Rephasing Solutions in Circular OrbitDi Wu, Xiang Guo , Fanghua Jiang and Hexi Baoyin23 December 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 0, No. 0Rapid optimization of continuous trajectory for multi-target exploration propelled by electric sailsAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 129Analytical Costate Estimation by a Reference Trajectory-Based Least-Squares MethodDi Wu, Lin Cheng , Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li31 March 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Fast costate estimation for indirect trajectory optimization using Bezier-curve-based shaping approachAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 126Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Optimal Planar Orbit TransfersEnrico Schiassi, Andrea D’Ambrosio , Kristofer Drozd , Fabio Curti and Roberto Furfaro 4 January 2022 | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 59, No. 3Efficient optimization method for variable-specific-impulse low-thrust trajectories with shutdown constraint7 February 2022 | Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 65, No. 3Analytical shaping method for low-thrust rendezvous trajectory using cubic spline functionsActa Astronautica, Vol. 72High-precision shape approximation low-thrust trajectory optimization method satisfying bi-objective indexChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 35, No. 1Analytic Costate Initialization from Rough State-Trajectory EstimatesEmmanuel E. Skamangas, John A. Lawton and Jonathan T. Black6 September 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 12Minimum-time low-thrust many-revolution geocentric trajectories with analytical costates initializationAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 119A New 3D Shaping Method for Low-Thrust Trajectories between Non-Intersect Orbits24 October 2021 | Aerospace, Vol. 8, No. 11Fuel-Optimal Spacecraft Cluster Flight Around an Ellipsoidal AsteroidWei Wang, Di Wu, Hanlun Lei and Hexi Baoyin7 July 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 10Rapid generation of low-thrust many-revolution earth-center trajectories based on analytical state-based controlActa Astronautica, Vol. 187Warm Start for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization via Switched SystemDi Wu, Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li21 June 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 9A homotopy approach connecting time-optimal with fuel-optimal trajectories19 January 2021 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 366, No. 1Warm-Start Multihomotopic Optimization for Low-Thrust Many-Revolution TrajectoriesIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 56, No. 6Efficient Computation of Optimal Low Thrust Gravity Perturbed Orbit Transfers14 May 2019 | The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 67, No. 2Optimization of Variable-Specific-Impulse Gravity-Assist TrajectoriesZhemin Chi, Di Wu, Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li14 November 2019 | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 57, No. 2Multi-revolution low-thrust trajectory optimization using symplectic methods31 December 2019 | Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 63, No. 3Deep networks as approximators of optimal low-thrust and multi-impulse cost in multitarget missionsActa Astronautica, Vol. 166A data-driven indirect method for nonlinear optimal control28 August 2019 | Astrodynamics, Vol. 3, No. 4Real-Time Optimal Control for Spacecraft Orbit Transfer via Multiscale Deep Neural NetworksIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 55, No. 5Solar sail trajectory optimization of multi-asteroid rendezvous missionActa Astronautica, Vol. 157Fast Homotopy Method for Asteroid Landing Trajectory Optimization Using Approximate Initial CostatesHongwei Yang, Shuang Li and Xiaoli Bai26 November 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 3Low-Thrust Minimum-Fuel Trajectory Optimization Using Multiple Shooting Augmented by Analytical DerivativesYazhe Meng, Hao Zhang and Yang Gao20 December 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 3Neural Networks in Time-Optimal Low-Thrust Interplanetary TransfersIEEE Access, Vol. 7Initial Three-Dimensional Trajectory Design for Solar Sails Using Bezier Shaping ApproachIEEE Access, Vol. 7Learning Trajectories for Real- Time Optimal Control of QuadrotorsPhase-matching homotopic method for indirect optimization of long-duration low-thrust trajectoriesAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 62, No. 3Multi-rendezvous low-thrust trajectory optimization using costate transforming and homotopic approach23 May 2018 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 363, No. 6Power-limited low-thrust trajectory optimization with operation point detection18 May 2018 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 363, No. 6Performance Comparison of Smoothing Functions for Indirect Optimization of Minimum-Fuel Low-thrust TrajectoriesEhsan Taheri, Ella M. Atkins and Ilya Kolmanovsky7 January 2018On Satellite Orbit Decay Compensation in Low Earth OrbitsEhsan Taheri, Robert A. Zidek, Ilya Kolmanovsky and Anouck Girard7 January 2018Homotopy method for optimization of variable-specific-impulse low-thrust trajectories30 October 2017 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 362, No. 11 What's Popular Volume 40, Number 12December 2017 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2017 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsAerospace SciencesAstrodynamicsAstronauticsBoundary Element MethodComputational Fluid DynamicsFinite Difference MethodFluid DynamicsNumerical AnalysisOrbital ManeuversPseudospectral MethodsRunge-Kutta MethodsSpace Orbit KeywordsThrustTrajectory OptimizationNumerical OptimizationEarthIon ThrusterCylindrical Coordinate SystemOrbital TransferNumerical IntegrationParticle Swarm OptimizationLegendre Pseudospectral MethodAcknowledgmentThis work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 11672146 and 11432001).PDF Received31 January 2017Accepted6 June 2017Published online2 August 2017

Fuel-Optimal Spacecraft Cluster Flight Around an Ellipsoidal Asteroid

Long-Term Analytical Boundedness Conditions for Relative Orbits under Third-Body Perturbations

Analytical Costate Estimation by a Reference Trajectory-Based Least-Squares Method

Adaptive Momentum Distribution Jitter Control for Microsatellite

Warm Start for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization via Switched System

Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Geocentric Transfer with Longitude Estimation and Costate Prediction

Minimum-Time Rendezvous via Simplified Initial Costate Normalization and Auxiliary Orbital Transfer

Closed-Loop, Exact-Time, Minimum-Energy Attitude Control with Analytic Gain Selection

Improving Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization by Adjoint Estimation with Shape-Based Path

Uncertainty Quantification for Short Rendezvous Missions Using a Nonlinear Covariance Propagation Method

Simple Shaping Approximation for Low-Thrust Trajectories Between Coplanar Elliptical Orbits

Large Field-of-View Infrared Horizon Sensor Attitude Correction for Earth's Oblateness

Attitude Agile Maneuvering Control for Spacecraft Equipped with Hybrid Actuators

Near-Time-Optimal Repointing Maneuver of a Spacecraft with One DOF for Final Attitude

Two-Stage Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Deployment and Target Capture of Space Manipulators

Shaping Approximation for Low-Thrust Trajectories with Large Out-Of-Plane Motion

Neural-Network-Based Sliding-Mode Adaptive Control for Spacecraft Formation Using Aerodynamic Forces

Solar Sail Heliocentric Elliptic Displaced Orbits

Distributed Constrained Control Allocation for Cellularized Spacecraft Attitude Control System

Orbital Motions of a Solar Sail Around the L2 Earth–Moon Libration Point

Spacecraft Relative Motion Control Near an Asteroid With Uncertainties: A Lyapunov Redesign Approach