Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteDistributed Control Allocation for Spacecraft Attitude Takeover Control via Cellular Space RobotHaitao Chang, Panfeng Huang, Yizhai Zhang, Zhongjie Meng and Zhengxiong LiuHaitao ChangNorthwestern Polytechnical University, 710072 Xi’an, People’s Republic of China, Panfeng HuangNorthwestern Polytechnical University, 710072 Xi’an, People’s Republic of China, Yizhai ZhangNorthwestern Polytechnical University, 710072 Xi’an, People’s Republic of China, Zhongjie MengNorthwestern Polytechnical University, 710072 Xi’an, People’s Republic of China and Zhengxiong LiuNorthwestern Polytechnical University, 710072 Xi’an, People’s Republic of ChinaPublished Online:2 Sep 2018https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003626SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Benedict B. L., “Rationale for Need of In-Orbit Servicing Capabilities for GEO Spacecraft,” AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference and Exposition, AIAA Paper 2013-5444, Sept. 2013. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-5444 LinkGoogle Scholar[2] Xu W., Liang B., Li B. and Xu Y., “A Universal On-Orbit Servicing System Used in the Geostationary Orbit,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2011, pp. 95–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.02.012 ASRSDW 0273-1177 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[3] Tanaka H., Yamamoto N., Yairi T. and Machida K., “Reconfigurable Cellular Satellites Maintained by Space Robots,” Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2006, pp. 356–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2006.p0356 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[4] Tanaka H., Yamamoto N., Yairi T. and Machida K., “Precise Assembly by Autonomous Space Robot Using Skill Acquisition Learning,” 8th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space, European Space Agency, Paris, France, 2005, pp. 609–616. Google Scholar[5] Barnhart D., Sullivan B., Hunter R., Bruhn J., Fowler E., Hoag L., Chappie S., Henshaw G., Kelm B., Kennedy T. and et al., “Phoenix Project Status 2013,” AIAA SPACE 2013 conference and exposition, AIAA Paper 2013-5341, Sept. 2013. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-5341 LinkGoogle Scholar[6] Barnhart D. and Sullivan B., “Economics of Repurposing in Situ Retired Spacecraft Components,” AIAA SPACE 2012 Conference & Exposition, AIAA Paper 2012-5304, Sept. 2012. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-5304 LinkGoogle Scholar[7] Jaeger T. and Mirczak W., “Satlets—The Building Blocks of Future Satellites—And Which Mold Do You Use?” AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference and Exposition, AIAA Paper 2013-5485, Sept. 2013. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-5485 LinkGoogle Scholar[8] Jaeger T. and Mirczak W., “Phoenix and the New Satellite Paradigm Created by HISat,” 28th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satelites, AIAA/Utah State Univ., Paper SSC14 VII-6, 2014. Google Scholar[9] Weise J., Brieβ K., Adomeit A., Reimerdes H. G., Göller M. and Dillmann R., “An Intelligent Building Blocks Concept for On-Orbit-Satellite Servicing,” International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space, European Space Agency, Paris, France, 2012. Google Scholar[10] Goeller M., Oberlaender J., Uhl K., Roennau A. and Dillmann R., “Modular Robots for On-Orbit Satellite Servicing,” 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, Dec. 2012, pp. 2018–2023. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2012.6491265 Google Scholar[11] Chang H., Huang P., Lu Z., Meng Z., Liu Z. and Zhang Y., “Cellular Space Robot and Its Interactive Model Identification for Spacecraft Takeover Control,” 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, Oct. 2016, pp. 3069–3074. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2016.7759475 Google Scholar[12] Tarabini L., Gil J., Gandia F., Molina M. A., Cura J. M. D. and Ortega G., “Ground Guided CX-OLEV Rendez-Vous with Uncooperative Geostationary Satellite,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 61, Nos. 1–6, March 2007, pp. 312–325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.020 AASTCF 0094-5765 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] Kaiser C., Sjöberg F., Delcura J. M. and Eilertsen B., “SMART-OLEV—An Orbital Life Extension Vehicle for Servicing Commercial Spacecrafts in GEO,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 63, Nos. 1–4, 2008, pp. 400–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.12.053 AASTCF 0094-5765 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Xu W., Liang B. and Xu Y., “Survey of Modeling, Planning, and Ground Verification of Space Robotic Systems,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 68, No. 11, 2011, pp. 1629–1649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.12.004 AASTCF 0094-5765 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[15] Xu W., Meng D., Chen Y., Qian H. and Xu Y., “Dynamics Modeling and Analysis of a Flexible-Base Space Robot for Capturing Large Flexible Spacecraft,” Multibody System Dynamics, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2014, pp. 357–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-013-9389-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Chu Z. Y., Cui J. and Sun F. C., “Fuzzy Adaptive Disturbance-Observer-Based Robust Tracking Control of Electrically Driven Free-Floating Space Manipulator,” IEEE System Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2014, pp. 343–352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2012.2220171 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Chu Z., Ma Y. and Cui J., “Adaptive Reactionless Control Strategy via the PSO-ELM Algorithm for Free-Floating Space Robots During Manipulation of Unknown Objects,” Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2018, pp. 1321–1335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3947-6 NODYES 0924-090X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[18] Chu Z., Ma Y., Hou Y. and Wang F., “Inertial Parameter Identification Using Contact Force Information for an Unknown Object Captured by a Space Manipulator,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 131, Feb. 2017, pp. 69–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.019 AASTCF 0094-5765 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Zhang F., Huang P., Meng Z., Zhang Y. and Liu Z., “Dynamics Analysis and Controller Design for Maneuverable Tethered Space Net Robot,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 11, 2017, pp. 2828–2843. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002656 LinkGoogle Scholar[20] Zhang F. and Huang P., “Releasing Dynamics and Stability Control of Maneuverable Tethered Space Net,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2017, pp. 983–993. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2016.2628052 IATEFW 1083-4435 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Chu Z., Di J. and Cui J., “Analysis of the Effect of Attachment Point Bias During Large Space Debris Removal Using a Tethered Space Tug,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 139, June 2017, pp. 34–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.06.028 AASTCF 0094-5765 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Huang P., Zhang F., Cai J., Wang D., Meng Z. and Guo J., “Dexterous Tethered Space Robot: Design, Measurement, Control and Experiment,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2017, pp. 1452–1468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2671558 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[23] Soltani M., Keshmiri M. and Misra A. K., “Dynamic Analysis and Trajectory Tracking of a Tethered Space Robot,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 128, Nov.–Dec. 2016, pp. 335–342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.06.006 AASTCF 0094-5765 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[24] Shan M., Guo J. and Gill E., “Review and Comparison of Active Space Debris Capturing and Removal Methods,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 80, Jan. 2016, pp. 18–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.11.001 PAESD6 0376-0421 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[25] Johansen T. A. and Fossen T. I., “Control Allocation—A Survey,” Automatica, Vol. 49, No. 5, 2013, pp. 1087–1103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.01.035 ATCAA9 0005-1098 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[26] Durham W. C., “Constrained Control Allocation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 16, No. 4, 1993, pp. 717–725. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21072 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[27] Durham W. C., “Constrained Control Allocation: Three-Moment Problem,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1994, pp. 330–336. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21201 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[28] Bordignon K. A. and Durham W. C., “Null-Space Augmented Solutions to Constrained Control Allocation Problems,” AIAA Paper 1995-3209-CP, Aug. 1995, pp. 328–333. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1995-3209 LinkGoogle Scholar[29] Härkegård O., “Dynamic Control Allocation Using Constrained Quadratic Programming,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2004, pp. 1028–1034. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.11607 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[30] Cao X., Yue C., Liu M. and Wu B., “Time Efficient Spacecraft Maneuver Using Constrained Torque Distribution,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 123, March 2016, pp. 320–329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.03.026 AASTCF 0094-5765 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[31] Huang P., Wang M., Meng Z., Chang H., Zhang F. and Liu Z., “Attitude Takeover Control for Post-Capture of Target Spacecraft Using Space Robot,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 51, April 2016, pp. 171–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.02.006 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[32] Huang P., Wang M., Meng Z., Chang H., Zhang F. and Liu Z., “Reconfigurable Spacecraft Takeover Control in Post-Capture of Target by Space Manipulators,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 353, No. 9, 2016, pp. 1985–2008. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2016.03.011 JFINAB 0016-0032 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[33] Yang L. and Yang J., “Nonsingular Fast Terminal Sliding-Mode Control for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, Vol. 21, No. 16, 2011, pp. 1865–1879. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.v21.16 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[34] Mesbahi M. and Egerstedt M., “Distributed Estimation,” Graph Theoretic Methods in Multiagent Networks, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010, pp. 191–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[35] Godsil C. and Royle G., “The Laplacian of a Graph,” Algebraic Graph Theory, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York, 2001, pp. 279–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0163-9 CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byDistributed Adaptive Attitude Takeover Control of Failed Spacecraft With Parameters IdentificationIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 31, No. 2Distributed Optimization Method for Spacecraft Attitude Control and Vibration SuppressionYabo Hu, Franco Bernelli-Zazzera and Yunhai Geng1 February 2023 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 0, No. 0Distributed impedance control for cellular space robot in spacecraft takeover control*Neural-network-based adaptive quantized attitude takeover control of spacecraft by using cellular satellitesAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 70, No. 7An event-triggered differential game strategy for modular reconfigurable satellites based on SDC modelReinforcement-Learning-Based Task Planning for Self-Reconfiguration of Cellular SatellitesIEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, Vol. 37, No. 6Bi-level game-based reconfigurable control for on-orbit assemblyAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 124Non-cooperative differential game based output feedback control for spacecraft attitude regulationActa Astronautica, Vol. 193Cooperative Game Method for On-Orbit Substructure Transportation Using Modular RobotsIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 2Robust fault-tolerant attitude control of spacecraft using hybrid actuators8 June 2021 | Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, Vol. 94, No. 5Distributed Constrained Control Allocation for Cellularized Spacecraft Attitude Control SystemWeixing Liu , Yunhai Geng, Baolin Wu and James D. Biggs25 October 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 2Distributed optimal control allocation for 6-dof spacecraft with redundant thrustersAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 118Simultaneous Spacecraft Attitude Control and Vibration Suppression via Control AllocationYabo Hu, Yunhai Geng and James D. Biggs28 June 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 10Robust coordinated control for on-orbit substructure transportation under distributed information2 April 2021 | Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 104, No. 3Event-triggered adaptive fuzzy attitude takeover control of spacecraftAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 67, No. 6Fuzzy-Logic-Based Robust Attitude Control of Networked Spacecraft via Event-Triggered MechanismIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 57, No. 1Closed-Loop Based Control Allocation for Spacecraft Attitude Stabilization with Actuator Faults14 March 2021Adaptive Neural Network Model-based Event-triggered Attitude Tracking Control for Spacecraft5 August 2020 | International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, Vol. 19, No. 1Flexible Spacecraft Vibration Suppression by Distributed ActuatorsYabo Hu, Yunhai Geng and Baolin Wu25 August 2020 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 43, No. 11Distributed cooperative game method for attitude takeover of failed satellites using nanosatellitesAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 106A control allocation scheme for spacecraft attitude stabilization based on distributed average consensusAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 106Neural-Network-Based Adaptive Event-triggered Control for Spacecraft Attitude TrackingIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, Vol. 31, No. 10Robust event-triggered game-based attitude control for on-orbit assemblyAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 103A New Control Allocation Method Based on the Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer Algorithm for Aircraft with Multiple ActuatorsA Self-Reconfiguration Planning Strategy for Cellular SatellitesIEEE Access, Vol. 7 What's Popular Volume 41, Number 11November 2018 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2018 by the authors. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerospace SciencesAstrodynamicsAstronauticsAttitude ControlSatellite TechnologySatellite-Based ServicesSpace Exploration and TechnologySpace MissionsSpace RobotSpace Science and TechnologySpacecraft Attitude Control KeywordsSpace RobotSpacecraft AttitudeTarget SpacecraftSatellitesSpace ManipulatorAttitude Control SystemTerminal Sliding ModeNumerical SimulationSatellite ServicesCommunications SatelliteAcknowledgmentsThis work was supported in part by the National Science Found for Distinguished Young Scholars of China under Grant 61725303, in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61773317, and in part by the Chinese Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities under Grants 3102016BJJ03 and 3102017JG02005.PDF Received6 February 2018Accepted25 June 2018Published online2 September 2018

Abstract:No AccessEngineering NotesRobust Saturated Finite-Time Attitude Control for Spacecraft Using Integral Sliding ModeYong Guo, Bing Huang, Shen-min Song, Ai-jun Li and Chang-qing WangYong GuoNorthwestern Polytechnical University, 710129 Xi’an, People’s Republic of China*Assistant Professor, School of Automation, 127 Youyi West Road, Beilin, Shaanxi; .Search for more papers by this author, Bing HuangNorthwestern Polytechnical University, 710129 Xi’an, People’s Republic of China†Ph.D. Student, School of Automation, 127 Youyi West Road, Beilin, Shaanxi.Search for more papers by this author, Shen-min SongHarbin Institute of Technology, 150001 Harbin, People’s Republic of China‡Professor, Center for Control Theory and Guidance Technology.Search for more papers by this author, Ai-jun LiNorthwestern Polytechnical University, 710129 Xi’an, People’s Republic of China§Professor, School of Automation, 127 Youyi West Road, Beilin, Shaanxi.Search for more papers by this author and Chang-qing WangNorthwestern Polytechnical University, 710129 Xi’an, People’s Republic of China¶Associate Professor, School of Automation, 127 Youyi West Road, Beilin, Shaanxi.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:26 Nov 2018https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003520SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Zou A. M., Kumar K. D. and de Ruiter A. H., “Spacecraft Attitude Control Using Two Control Torques,” Information Sciences, Vol. 408, Oct. 2017, pp. 23–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.04.032 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Show L. L., Juang J. C., Lin C. T. and Jan Y. W., “Spacecraft Robust Attitude Tracking Design: PID Control Approach,” American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2002, pp. 1360–1365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2002.1023210 Google Scholar[3] Li Y., Sun Z. and Ye D., “Robust Linear PID Controller for Satellite Attitude Stabilization and Attitude Tracking Control,” International Journal of Space Science and Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2016, pp. 64–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSPACESE.2016.078581 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[4] Wang Q., Zhou B., Wen C. and Duan G. R., “Output Feedback Gain Scheduled Control of Actuator Saturated Linear Systems with Applications to the Spacecraft Rendezvous,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 351, No. 11, 2014, pp. 5015–5033. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2014.08.009 JFINAB 0016-0032 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Chen B. S., Wu C. S. and Jan Y. W., “Adaptive Fuzzy Mixed H2/H∞ Attitude Control of Spacecraft,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2000, pp. 1343–1359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/7.892682 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] Gao X., Teo K. L. and Duan G. R., “Robust H∞ Control of Spacecraft Rendezvous on Elliptical Orbit,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 349, No. 8, 2012, pp. 2515–2529. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2012.08.005 JFINAB 0016-0032 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[7] Guo Y., Song S. M., Li X. H. and Li P., “Terminal Sliding Mode Control for Attitude Tracking of Spacecraft Under Input Saturation,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2017, Paper 06016006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000691 JAEEEZ 0893-1321 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Robinett R. D. and Parker G. G., “Spacecraft Euler Parameter Tracking of Large-Angle Maneuvers via Sliding Mode Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1996, pp. 702–703. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21677 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Pukdeboon C., “Inverse Optimal Sliding Mode Control of Spacecraft with Coupled Translation and Attitude Dynamics,” International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 46, No. 13, 2015, pp. 2421–2438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2015.1011251 IJSYA9 0020-7721 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[10] Hu Q. L., Zhang Y., Huo X. and Xiao B., “Adaptive Integral-Type Sliding Mode Control for Spacecraft Attitude Maneuvering Under Actuator Stuck Failures,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2011, pp. 32–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60005-8 CJAEEZ 1000-9361 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[11] Lu K. and Xia Y., “Finite-Time Fault-Tolerant Control for Rigid Spacecraft with Actuator Saturations,” IET Control Theory and Applications, Vol. 7, No. 11, 2013, pp. 1529–1539. doi:https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2012.1031 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Huang X., Yan Y. and Zhou Y., “Neural Network-Based Adaptive Second Order Sliding Mode Control of Lorentz-Augmented Spacecraft Formation,” Neurocomputing, Vol. 222, Jan. 2017, pp. 191–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.10.021 NRCGEO 0925-2312 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] Zou A. M. and Kumar K. D., “Distributed Attitude Coordination Control for Spacecraft Formation Flying,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2012, pp. 1329–1346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2012.6178065 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Guo Y., Song S. M. and Li X. H., “Finite-Time Output Feedback Attitude Coordination Control for Formation Flying Spacecraft Without Unwinding,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 122, May–June 2016, pp. 159–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.01.015 AASTCF 0094-5765 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[15] Guo Y., Guo J. H. and Song S. M., “Backstepping Control for Attitude Tracking of the Spacecraft Under Input Saturation,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 138, Sept. 2017, pp. 318–325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.06.002 AASTCF 0094-5765 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Shi X. N., Zhou Z. G. and Zhou D., “Finite-Time Attitude Trajectory Tracking Control of Rigid Spacecraft,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 53, No. 6, 2017, pp. 2913–2923. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2720298 IEARAX 0018-9251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Du H. and Li S., “Semi-Global Finite-Time Attitude Stabilization by Output Feedback for a Rigid Spacecraft,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 227, No. 12, 2013, pp. 1881–1891. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410012464454 Google Scholar[18] Lu K. and Xia Y., “Adaptive Attitude Tracking Control for Rigid Spacecraft with Finite-Time Convergence,” Automatica, Vol. 49, No. 12, 2013, pp. 3591–3599. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.09.001 ATCAA9 0005-1098 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Huo B., Xia Y., Lu K. and Fu M., “Adaptive Fuzzy Finite-Time Fault-Tolerant Attitude Control of Rigid Spacecraft,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 352, No. 10, 2015, pp. 4225–4246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2015.05.042 JFINAB 0016-0032 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Gui H. and Vukovich G., “Global Finite-Time Attitude Tracking via Quaternion Feedback,” Systems and Control Letters, Vol. 97, Nov. 2016, pp. 176–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2016.09.017 SCLEDC 0167-6911 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Cheng Y., Du H., He Y. and Jia R., “Distributed Finite-Time Attitude Regulation for Multiple Rigid Spacecraft Via Bounded Control,” Information Sciences, Vol. 328, Jan. 2016, pp. 144–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.08.042 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Hu Q., Jiang B. and Friswell M. I., “Robust Saturated Finite Time Output Feedback Attitude Stabilization for Rigid Spacecraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2014, pp. 1914–1929. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000153 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[23] Su Y., “Comment on “Robust Saturated Finite Time Output Feedback Attitude Stabilization for Rigid Spacecraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2016, pp. 1538–1539. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001555 JGCODS 0731-5090 Google Scholar[24] Huo M., Huo X., Karimi H. R. and Ni J., “Finite-Time Control for Attitude Tracking Maneuver of Rigid Satellite,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, Vol. 2014, Feb. 2014, Paper 302982. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/302982 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[25] Xiao B., Hu Q., Zhang Y. and Huo X., “Fault-Tolerant Tracking Control of Spacecraft with Attitude-Only Measurement Under Actuator Failures,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2014, pp. 838–849. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.61369 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[26] Khalil H. K., Nonlinear Systems, 3rd ed., Prentice–Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002, p. 128. Google Scholar[27] Krstic M., Kanellakopoulos I. and Kokotovic P., Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design, Vol. 222, Wiley, New York, 1995, pp. 490–491. Google Scholar[28] Du H. and Li S., “Finite-Time Attitude Stabilization for a Spacecraft Using Homogeneous Method,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2012, pp. 740–748. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.56262 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar[29] Feng Y., Yu X. and Man Z., “Non-Singular Terminal Sliding Mode Control of Rigid Manipulators,” Automatica, Vol. 38, No. 12, 2002, pp. 2159–2167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00147-4 ATCAA9 0005-1098 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[30] Qian C. and Lin W., “A Continuous Feedback Approach to Global Strong Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 46, No. 7, 2001, pp. 1061–1079. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/9.935058 IETAA9 0018-9286 CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byPrescribed-Time Spacecraft Attitude Control Using Time-Varying State FeedbackVikram Kumar Saini, Dipak Kumar Giri and Renuganth Varatharajoo10 March 2023 | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 0, No. 0Predefined‐time control for Euler–Lagrange systems with model uncertainties and actuator faults26 September 2022 | Asian Journal of Control, Vol. 25, No. 2Prescribed Time Spacecraft Attitude Control Using Time-Varying State-FeedbackVikram K. Saini and Dipak K. Giri19 January 2023Three-dimensional impact angles constrained integral sliding mode guidance law for missiles with input saturation23 February 2022 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 14Global finite‐time cooperative control for multiple manipulators using integral sliding mode control9 March 2022 | Asian Journal of Control, Vol. 24, No. 6Disturbance observer-based nonfragile fuzzy tracking control of a spacecraftAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 33Adaptive chaos synchronization of an attitude control of satellite: A backstepping based sliding mode approachHeliyon, Vol. 8, No. 11Finite-time stabilization for a novel non-contact spacecraft with a small air-clearance range constraintMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 180Attitude tracking control for fractionated spacecraft with actuator failures under adaptive event-triggered strategyAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 70, No. 5Fault-Tolerant Reduced-Attitude Control for Spacecraft Constrained Boresight ReorientationXiaodong Shao, Qinglei Hu, Zheng H. Zhu and Youmin Zhang 2 May 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Novel finite-time adaptive sliding mode tracking control for disturbed mechanical systems6 May 2022 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 236, No. 16Efficient Event-Based Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for Spacecraft Attitude StabilizationSyed Muhammad Amrr , Arghya Chakravarty, Md. Mottahir Alam, Abdullah A. Algethami and M. Nabi21 March 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 7Indirect Neural-Enhanced Integral Sliding Mode Control for Finite-Time Fault-Tolerant Attitude Tracking of Spacecraft15 July 2022 | Mathematics, Vol. 10, No. 14Adaptive actor-critic learning-based robust appointed-time attitude tracking control for uncertain rigid spacecrafts with performance and input constraintsAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 66Rotation matrix-based finite-time attitude coordinated control for spacecraftAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 69, No. 2Adaptive fuzzy fault-tolerant control for the attitude tracking of spacecraft within finite timeActa Astronautica, Vol. 189Passivity-Based Pulse-Width-Modulated Spacecraft Attitude ControlXiaoyu Lang and Anton de Ruiter30 July 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 11Event-triggered sliding mode attitude coordinated control for spacecraft formation flying system with disturbancesActa Astronautica, Vol. 188A novel finite-time prescribed performance control scheme for spacecraft attitude trackingAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 118Finite-time distributed formation control for multiple unmanned surface vehicles with input saturationOcean Engineering, Vol. 233Stability Analysis of A Class of Second-Order Phase Plane Control Systems: A Simulation StudyReview of advanced guidance and control algorithms for space/aerospace vehiclesProgress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 122Coordinated attitude control for flexible spacecraft formation with actuator configuration misalignmentChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 34, No. 3Neural Network-Based Finite-Time Fault-Tolerant Control for Spacecraft without UnwindingInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2021Finite-Time Fault-Tolerant Spacecraft Attitude Control with Torque Saturation14 March 2021OverviewReferencesRobust Nonsingular Terminal Sliding Mode Attitude Control of SatellitesJournal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 1Finite-time attitude maneuvering and vibration suppression of flexible spacecraftJournal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 357, No. 16Rigid spacecraft robust optimal attitude stabilization under actuator misalignmentsAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 105Continuous Finite-Time Integral Sliding Mode Control for Attitude StabilizationIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, Vol. 67, No. 10Neural network-based adaptive terminal sliding mode control for the deployment process of the dual-body tethered satellite system21 December 2019 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 234, No. 6Finite-time blended control for air-to-air missile with lateral thrusters and aerodynamic surfacesAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 97Hyperbolic Tangent Function-Based Finite-Time Sliding Mode Control for Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuver Without ChatteringIEEE Access, Vol. 8Continuous Fixed-Time Sliding Mode Attitude Controller Design for Rigid-Body SpacecraftIEEE Access, Vol. 8Inertial vector measurements based attitude synchronization control for multiple spacecraft formationAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 93 What's Popular Volume 42, Number 2February 2019 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2018 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerospace SciencesAstrodynamicsAstronauticsAttitude ControlSpace Systems and VehiclesSpacecraft DesignSpacecraft SystemSpacecrafts KeywordsSpacecraft ModelsAttitude DynamicsIntegral Sliding Mode ControlOutput FeedbackAttitude TrackingAttitude KinematicsSpacecraft SystemSpacecraft ControlAtmospheric DragFuzzy LogicAcknowledgmentsThis study was cosupported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 61803307) and the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China under grant nos. 20160153003 and 2016ZC53019.PDF Received18 December 2017Accepted5 September 2018Published online26 November 2018

Distributed Constrained Control Allocation for Cellularized Spacecraft Attitude Control System

Distributed Optimization Method for Spacecraft Attitude Control and Vibration Suppression

Adaptive Attitude Stabilization Control Design for Spacecraft under Physical Limitations

Simultaneous Spacecraft Attitude Control and Vibration Suppression Via Control Allocation

Constrained Control Allocation of a Quadrotor-Like Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

Prescribed Performance-Based Fixed-Time Adaptive Control Allocation for Overactuated Spacecraft

Attitude Agile Maneuvering Control for Spacecraft Equipped with Hybrid Actuators

Adaptive Momentum Distribution Jitter Control for Microsatellite

Large Field-of-View Infrared Horizon Sensor Attitude Correction for Earth's Oblateness

Flexible Spacecraft Vibration Suppression by Distributed Actuators

Distributed Control Allocation for Spacecraft Attitude Takeover Control Via Cellular Space Robot

Adaptive Attitude Tracking with Active Uncertainty Rejection

Robustness Analysis and Performance Tuning for the Quaternion Proportional–Derivative Attitude Controller

Attitude Tracking Control for Rigid-Flexible Coupled Spacecraft with Guaranteed Performance Bounds

Attitude Control of Spacecraft with Actuator Uncertainty

Closed-Loop, Exact-Time, Minimum-Energy Attitude Control with Analytic Gain Selection

Bound Evaluation for Spacecraft Swarm on Libration Orbits with an Uncertain Boundary

Robust Control of Flexible Spacecraft During Large-Angle Attitude Maneuver

Spacecraft Attitude Reorientation with Reaction Wheel Assembly Via State-Dependent Coefficient Parameterizations

Spacecraft Anti-Unwinding Attitude Control with Actuator Nonlinearities and Velocity Limit

Robust Saturated Finite-Time Attitude Control for Spacecraft Using Integral Sliding Mode