Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteFlexible Multibody Model and the Dynamics of the Deployment of Mesh AntennasYun Peng, Zhihua Zhao, Ming Zhou, Jiawei He, Jungang Yang and Yong XiaoYun PengTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People's Republic of China, Zhihua ZhaoTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People's Republic of China, Ming ZhouTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People's Republic of China, Jiawei HeTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People's Republic of China, Jungang YangXi'an Space Radio Academic Institution, 710071 Xi'an, People's Republic of China and Yong XiaoXi'an Space Radio Academic Institution, 710071 Xi'an, People's Republic of ChinaPublished Online:3 Mar 2017https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000361SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Hedgepeth J. M., "Accuracy Potentials for Large Space Antenna Reflectors with Passive Structure," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 19, No. 3, May 1982, pp. 211–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.62239 JSCRAG 0022-4650 LinkGoogle Scholar[2] Meguro A., "An Ultra-Light Large Antenna Reflector for Communication Satellites," Proceedings of the 54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Inst. of Space Law, International Astronautical Congress Paper IAC-03-I.1.06, Bremen, Germany, Sept. 2003. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.IAC-03-I.1.06 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Tibert G., "Deployable Tensegrity Structures for Space Applications," Ph.D. Dissertation, Royal Inst. of Technology, Stockholm, 2002. Google Scholar[4] Thomson M. W., Marks G. W. and Hedgepeth J. M., "Light-Weight Reflector for Concentrating Radiation," U.S. Patent 5,680,145, Oct. 1997. Google Scholar[5] Thomson M. W., "The Astromesh Deployable Reflector," Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Vol. 3, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 1999, pp. 1516–1519. Google Scholar[6] Mobrem M., Kuehn S., Spier C. and Slimko E., "Design and Performance of Astromesh Reflector Onboard Soil Moisture Active Passive Spacecraft," Proceedings of the Aerospace Conference, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2012, pp. 1–10. Google Scholar[7] Li T., "Deployment Analysis and Control of Deployable Space Antenna," Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 18, No. 1, April 2012, pp. 42–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2011.04.001 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Lin J. and Fang H. F., "Concept Study of a 35-m Spherical Reflector System for NEXRAD in Space Application," 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, NewPort, Rhode Island, May 2006. Google Scholar[9] Smith T., Lee B., Semler D. and Chae D., "A Large S-Band Antenna for a Mobile Satellite," Space 2004 Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2004-6120, Sept. 2004. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-6120 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Géradin M. and Cardona A., Flexible Multibody Dynamics: A Finite Element Approach, Wiley, New York, 2001, Chaps. 5–7. Google Scholar[11] Bauchau O. A., Flexible Multibody Dynamics, Vol. 176, Springer, The Netherlands, 2010, Chaps. 10, 16. Google Scholar[12] Yu L., Zhao Z., Tang J. and Ren G., "Integration of Absolute Nodal Elements into Multibody System," Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 62, No. 4, Dec. 2010, pp. 931–943. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-010-9775-6 NODYES 0924-090X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] Hong D. and Ren G., "A Modeling of Sliding Joint on One-Dimensional Flexible Medium," Multibody System Dynamics, Vol. 26, No. 1, Jan. 2011, pp. 91–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-010-9242-7 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Schiehlen W., "Multibody System Dynamics: Roots and Perspectives," Multibody System Dynamics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1997, pp. 149–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009745432698 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[15] Yang C. and Ren G., "Dynamic Simulation of Multifold Deployable Rings," AIAA Journal, Vol. 52, No. 7, July 2014, pp. 1555–1559. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052187 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Simo J. C. and Vu-Quoc L., "A Three-Dimensional Finite-Strain Rod Model. Part 2: Computational Aspects," Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 58, No. 1, 1986, pp. 79–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(86)90079-4 CMMECC 0045-7825 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Shabana A. A., Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 3rd ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2005, Chap. 3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[18] Bauchau O. A., Epple A. and Bottasso C. L., "Scaling of Constraints and Augmented Lagrangian Formulations in Multibody Dynamics Simulations," Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2009, pp. 7–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3079826 JCNDDM 1555-1415 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Hairer E. and Wanner G., Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II: Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 2010, Chap. 7. Google Scholar[20] Goldstein H., Poole C. P. and Safko J. L., Classical Mechanics, 3rd ed., Pearson Education International, Pearson Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002, pp. 16–21. Google Scholar[21] Bathe K.-J., Finite Element Procedures, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996, pp. 796–797. Google Scholar[22] Beer F. P., Johnston E. R. and Mazurek D. F., Vector Mechanics for Engineers. Statics, 10th ed., McGraw–Hill, New York, 2013, pp. 449–451. Google Scholar[23] Danielson J. D., "Mobile Boom Cranes and Advanced Input Shaping Control," Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Inst. of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 2008. Google Scholar[24] Sabatini M., Gasbarri P. and Palmerini G. B., "Elastic Issues and Vibration Reduction in a Tethered Deorbiting Mission," Advances in Space Research, Vol. 57, No. 9, May 2016, pp. 1951–1964. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.02.010 ASRSDW 0273-1177 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[25] Zhao Z. and Ren G., "A Quaternion-Based Formulation of Euler–Bernoulli Beam Without Singularity," Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 67, No. 3, Feb. 2012, pp. 1825–1835. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-011-0109-0 NODYES 0924-090X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[26] Wu J., Zhao Z. and Ren G., "Multibody Analysis of the Force in Deploying Booms," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 36, No. 6, Nov. 2013, pp. 1881–1886. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.60296 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byThe Pretension Design of Cable Mesh considering the Large Deformation of Ring TrussInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2023Driving cable design for a cylindrical deployable mechanism based on depth first searchActa Astronautica, Vol. 202Investigation of compact packing strategy for large rigid-panel deployable antennasMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 176Recent Advances in Space-Deployable Structures in ChinaEngineering, Vol. 17Deployment Strategy and Dynamic Analysis of Large Ring Truss AntennaInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2022Deployment modeling for soft cable networks from slack to tensionInternational Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 221Configurational forces and geometrically exact formulation of sliding beams in non-material domainsComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 395Numerical integration algorithms and constraint formulations for an ALE-ANCF cable elementMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 170Rod-removal technique for flexible-rods in the framework of semi-recursive multibody formulationMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 169Deployable Structures: Structural Design and Static/Dynamic Analysis27 October 2021 | Journal of Elasticity, Vol. 146, No. 2Nonlinear dynamic analysis of arresting gears using 2D non-material variable-domain corotational elementsMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 163Embodiment of intra-abdominal pressure in a flexible multibody model of the trunk and the spinal unloading effects during static lifting tasks29 May 2021 | Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, Vol. 20, No. 4Sensitivity analysis of deployable flexible space structures with a large number of design parameters2 August 2021 | Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 105, No. 3Iterative refinement algorithm for efficient velocities and accelerations solutions in closed-loop multibody dynamicsMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 152Dynamics Modelling and Simulation for Deployment Characteristics of Mesh Reflector Antennas6 November 2020 | Applied Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 21An efficient multibody dynamic model of arresting cable systems based on ALE formulationMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 151Modeling muscle wrapping and mass flow using a mass-variable multibody formulation20 March 2020 | Multibody System Dynamics, Vol. 49, No. 3A mass-flowing muscle model with shape restrictive soft tissues: correlation with sonoelastography18 December 2019 | Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, Vol. 19, No. 3Trade study to select best alternative for cable and pulley simulation for cranes on offshore vessels2 August 2019 | Systems Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 2Equivalence of Lagrange's equations for non-material volume and the principle of virtual work in ALE formulation17 December 2019 | Acta Mechanica, Vol. 231, No. 3Gravity compensation system of mesh antennas for in-orbit prediction of deployment dynamicsActa Astronautica, Vol. 167An efficient multibody dynamic model of three-dimensional meshing contacts in helical gear-shaft system and its solutionMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 142Thermal-structural dynamic analysis of a satellite antenna with the cable-network and hoop-truss supports20 August 2019 | Journal of Thermal Stresses, Vol. 42, No. 11Efficient and high-fidelity steering ability prediction of a slender drilling assembly10 August 2019 | Acta Mechanica, Vol. 230, No. 11Dynamic Analysis of the Deployment for Mesh Reflector Antennas Driven With Variable Length Cables23 September 2019 | Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 14, No. 11Harnessing noncircular gears to achieve nonlinear passive springsMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 140A Multibody Dynamics Approach to Limit Cycle Walking10 April 2019 | Robotica, Vol. 37, No. 10From multiscale modeling to design of synchronization mechanisms in mesh antennasActa Astronautica, Vol. 159Improved vibration attenuation performance of large hoop truss structures via a hybrid control algorithm3 May 2019 | Smart Materials and Structures, Vol. 28, No. 6Torsional negative stiffness mechanism by thin stripsTheoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, Vol. 9, No. 3Modeling and analysis of sliding joints with clearances in flexible multibody systems4 August 2018 | Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 94, No. 4Passive nonlinear actuators for deploying mesh antennasActa Astronautica, Vol. 152Simultaneous topology and size optimization of a 3D variable-length structure described by the ALE–ANCFMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 129An Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian formulation of a geometrically exact Timoshenko beam running through a tube3 May 2018 | Acta Mechanica, Vol. 229, No. 8A model order reduction method for the simulation of gear contacts based on Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian formulationComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 338Buckling of a slender rod confined in a circular tube: Theory, simulation, and experimentInternational Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 140 What's Popular Volume 40, Number 6June 2017Supplemental Materials CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2016 by the authors. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAntennasCommunication SystemCommunication Technology and EquipmentComputational Fluid DynamicsComputing, Information, and CommunicationFinite Element MethodFlexible and Active StructuresFluid DynamicsMultibody SimulationNumerical AnalysisNumerical InterpolationStructural AnalysisStructural EngineeringStructural Modeling and SimulationStructures, Design and TestTrusses KeywordsAntenna DesignTrussesBending MomentArbitrary Lagrangian EulerianLongeronsMass FlowMultibody SimulationLagrange MultipliersLinear InterpolationFriction CoefficientAcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Gexue Ren for several helpful discussions as well as the anonymous reviewers and the Associate Editor Jurek Sasiadek for their constructive and detailed comments on improving this Note. This research was conducted with financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11302114) and the Major State Basic Research Development Program (2012CB821203); their support is highly appreciated.PDF Received18 December 2015Accepted10 November 2016Published online3 March 2017

Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteImproving Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization by Adjoint Estimation with Shape-Based PathFanghua Jiang, Gao Tang and Junfeng LiFanghua JiangTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China*Associate Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; . Senior Member AIAA (Corresponding Author).Search for more papers by this author, Gao TangTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China†Master’s Student, School of Aerospace Engineering; currently Ph.D. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Duke University; .Search for more papers by this author and Junfeng LiTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People’s Republic of China‡Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; .Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:2 Aug 2017https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002803SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Hellín X. L., “Study of Earth-to-Mars Transfers with Low-Thrust Propulsion,” Polytechnic Univ. of Catalonia, School of Industrial and Aeronautical Engineering, Project Rept., Terrassa, Spain, Sept. 2011. Google Scholar[2] Betts J. T., “Survey of Numerical Methods for Trajectory Optimization,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1998, pp. 193–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4231 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Casalino L., “Approximate Optimization of Low-Thrust Transfers Between Low-Eccentricity Close Orbits,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2014, pp. 1003–1008. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.62046 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Gatto G. and Casalino L., “Fast Evaluation and Optimization of Low-Thrust Transfers to Multiple Targets,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 8, 2015, pp. 1525–1530. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001116 LinkGoogle Scholar[5] Zhao S. G., Gurfil P. and Zhang J. R., “Initial Costates for Low-Thrust Minimum-Time Station Change of Geostationary Satellites,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2016, pp. 2746–2756. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000431 LinkGoogle Scholar[6] Dixon L. C. W. and Biggs M. C., “The Advantages of Adjoint-Control Transformations When Determining Optimal Trajectories by Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle,” Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 76, No. 735, 1972, pp. 169–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000042731 Google Scholar[7] Russell R. P., “Primer Vector Theory Applied to Global Low-Thrust Trade Studies,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2007, pp. 460–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.22984 LinkGoogle Scholar[8] Guo T. D., Jiang F. H. and Li J. F., “Homotopic Approach and Pseudospectral Method Applied Jointly to Low Thrust Trajectory Optimization,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 71, Feb.–March 2012, pp. 38–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.08.008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Petropoulos A. E. and Longuski J. M., “Shape-Based Algorithm for the Automated Design of Low-Thrust, Gravity-Assist Trajectories,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2004, pp. 787–796. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.13095 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Wall B. J. and Conway B. A., “Shape-Based Approach to Low-Thrust Rendezvous Trajectory Design,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2009, pp. 95–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.36848 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Gondelach D. J. and Noomen R., “Hodographic-Shaping Method for Low-Thrust Interplanetary Trajectory Design,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2015, pp. 728–738. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A32991 LinkGoogle Scholar[12] Taheri E. and Abdelkhalik O., “Initial Three-Dimensional Low-Thrust Trajectory Design,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2016, pp. 889–903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.11.034 Google Scholar[13] Taheri E., Li N. I. and Kolmanovsky I., “Co-State Initialization for the Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 59, No. 9, 2017, pp. 2360–2373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.02.010 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Taheri E., Li N. I. and Kolmanovsky I., “Co-States Initialization of Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Trajectories Using Shape-Based Methods,” American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, July 2016, pp. 4053–4058. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2016.7525558 Google Scholar[15] Jiang F. H., Baoyin H. X. and Li J. F., “Practical Techniques for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization with Homotopic Approach,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2012, pp. 245–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.52476 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Tang G. and Jiang F. H., “Capture of Near-Earth Objects with Low-Thrust Propulsion and Invariant Manifolds,” Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 361, No. 1, 2016, Paper 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-015-2592-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Lewallen J. M., Schwausch O. A. and Tapley B. D., “Coordinate System Influence on the Regularized Trajectory Optimization Problem,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1971, pp. 15–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.30211 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Ranieri C. L. and Ocampo C. A., “Indirect Optimization of Spiral Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1360–1366. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19539 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] Jiang F. H. and Tang G., “Systematic Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization for a Multi-Rendezvous Mission Using Adjoint Scaling,” Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 361, No. 4, 2016, Paper 117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-016-2704-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Bertrand R. and Epenoy R., “New Smoothing Techniques for Solving Bang–Bang Optimal Control Problems Numerical Results and Statistical Interpretation,” Optimal Control Applications and Methods, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2002, pp. 171–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.709 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] More J. J., Garbow B. S. and Hillstrom K. E., “User Guide for MinPack-1,” Argonne National Lab. Rept. ANL-80-74, Lemont, IL, 1980; also https://github.com/devernay/cminpack [retrieved 10 Dec. 2012]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Novak D. M. and Vasile M., “Improved Shaping Approach to the Preliminary Design of Low-Thrust Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2011, pp. 128–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.50434 LinkGoogle Scholar[23] Xie C., Zhang G. and Zhang Y., “Shaping Approximation for Low-Thrust Trajectories with Large Out-of-Plane Motion,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2016, pp. 2780–2789. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001795 LinkGoogle Scholar[24] Popescu M., “Applications of Canonical Transformations in Optimizing Orbital Transfers,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1997, pp. 774–779. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4112 LinkGoogle Scholar[25] Wall B. J. and Novak D. M., “A 3D Shape-Based Approximation Method for Low-Thrust Trajectory Design,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 142, Jan. 2012, pp. 1163–1176; also American Astronomical Soc. Paper 11-479, 2011. Google Scholar[26] Kluever C. A., “Efficient Computation of Optimal Interplanetary Trajectories Using Solar Electric Propulsion,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2014, pp. 821–830. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000144 LinkGoogle Scholar[27] Taheri E., Kolmanovsky I. and Atkins E., “Enhanced Smoothing Technique for Indirect Optimization of Minimum-Fuel Low-Thrust Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 11, 2016, pp. 2500–2511. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000379 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byExploiting Scaling Constants to Facilitate the Convergence of Indirect Trajectory Optimization Methods12 February 2023 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 8GTOC 11: Results from Tsinghua University and Shanghai Institute of Satellite EngineeringActa Astronautica, Vol. 202Atlas of Optimal Low-Thrust Rephasing Solutions in Circular OrbitDi Wu, Xiang Guo , Fanghua Jiang and Hexi Baoyin23 December 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 0, No. 0Rapid optimization of continuous trajectory for multi-target exploration propelled by electric sailsAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 129Analytical Costate Estimation by a Reference Trajectory-Based Least-Squares MethodDi Wu, Lin Cheng , Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li31 March 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8Fast costate estimation for indirect trajectory optimization using Bezier-curve-based shaping approachAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 126Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Optimal Planar Orbit TransfersEnrico Schiassi, Andrea D’Ambrosio , Kristofer Drozd , Fabio Curti and Roberto Furfaro 4 January 2022 | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 59, No. 3Efficient optimization method for variable-specific-impulse low-thrust trajectories with shutdown constraint7 February 2022 | Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 65, No. 3Analytical shaping method for low-thrust rendezvous trajectory using cubic spline functionsActa Astronautica, Vol. 72High-precision shape approximation low-thrust trajectory optimization method satisfying bi-objective indexChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 35, No. 1Analytic Costate Initialization from Rough State-Trajectory EstimatesEmmanuel E. Skamangas, John A. Lawton and Jonathan T. Black6 September 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 12Minimum-time low-thrust many-revolution geocentric trajectories with analytical costates initializationAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 119A New 3D Shaping Method for Low-Thrust Trajectories between Non-Intersect Orbits24 October 2021 | Aerospace, Vol. 8, No. 11Fuel-Optimal Spacecraft Cluster Flight Around an Ellipsoidal AsteroidWei Wang, Di Wu, Hanlun Lei and Hexi Baoyin7 July 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 10Rapid generation of low-thrust many-revolution earth-center trajectories based on analytical state-based controlActa Astronautica, Vol. 187Warm Start for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization via Switched SystemDi Wu, Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li21 June 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 9A homotopy approach connecting time-optimal with fuel-optimal trajectories19 January 2021 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 366, No. 1Warm-Start Multihomotopic Optimization for Low-Thrust Many-Revolution TrajectoriesIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 56, No. 6Efficient Computation of Optimal Low Thrust Gravity Perturbed Orbit Transfers14 May 2019 | The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 67, No. 2Optimization of Variable-Specific-Impulse Gravity-Assist TrajectoriesZhemin Chi, Di Wu, Fanghua Jiang and Junfeng Li14 November 2019 | Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 57, No. 2Multi-revolution low-thrust trajectory optimization using symplectic methods31 December 2019 | Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 63, No. 3Deep networks as approximators of optimal low-thrust and multi-impulse cost in multitarget missionsActa Astronautica, Vol. 166A data-driven indirect method for nonlinear optimal control28 August 2019 | Astrodynamics, Vol. 3, No. 4Real-Time Optimal Control for Spacecraft Orbit Transfer via Multiscale Deep Neural NetworksIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 55, No. 5Solar sail trajectory optimization of multi-asteroid rendezvous missionActa Astronautica, Vol. 157Fast Homotopy Method for Asteroid Landing Trajectory Optimization Using Approximate Initial CostatesHongwei Yang, Shuang Li and Xiaoli Bai26 November 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 3Low-Thrust Minimum-Fuel Trajectory Optimization Using Multiple Shooting Augmented by Analytical DerivativesYazhe Meng, Hao Zhang and Yang Gao20 December 2018 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 3Neural Networks in Time-Optimal Low-Thrust Interplanetary TransfersIEEE Access, Vol. 7Initial Three-Dimensional Trajectory Design for Solar Sails Using Bezier Shaping ApproachIEEE Access, Vol. 7Learning Trajectories for Real- Time Optimal Control of QuadrotorsPhase-matching homotopic method for indirect optimization of long-duration low-thrust trajectoriesAdvances in Space Research, Vol. 62, No. 3Multi-rendezvous low-thrust trajectory optimization using costate transforming and homotopic approach23 May 2018 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 363, No. 6Power-limited low-thrust trajectory optimization with operation point detection18 May 2018 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 363, No. 6Performance Comparison of Smoothing Functions for Indirect Optimization of Minimum-Fuel Low-thrust TrajectoriesEhsan Taheri, Ella M. Atkins and Ilya Kolmanovsky7 January 2018On Satellite Orbit Decay Compensation in Low Earth OrbitsEhsan Taheri, Robert A. Zidek, Ilya Kolmanovsky and Anouck Girard7 January 2018Homotopy method for optimization of variable-specific-impulse low-thrust trajectories30 October 2017 | Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 362, No. 11 What's Popular Volume 40, Number 12December 2017 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2017 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsAerospace SciencesAstrodynamicsAstronauticsBoundary Element MethodComputational Fluid DynamicsFinite Difference MethodFluid DynamicsNumerical AnalysisOrbital ManeuversPseudospectral MethodsRunge-Kutta MethodsSpace Orbit KeywordsThrustTrajectory OptimizationNumerical OptimizationEarthIon ThrusterCylindrical Coordinate SystemOrbital TransferNumerical IntegrationParticle Swarm OptimizationLegendre Pseudospectral MethodAcknowledgmentThis work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 11672146 and 11432001).PDF Received31 January 2017Accepted6 June 2017Published online2 August 2017

Generalized Relative Jacobian Matrix of Space Robot for Dual-Arm Coordinated Capture

Constrained Control Allocation of a Quadrotor-Like Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

Visualized Trajectory Planning of Flexible Redundant Robotic Arm Using A Novel Hybrid Algorithm

Liberating Humanity from Heavy Labor: Dual-Arm Coordination and Teleoperation Control for an Assistive Robot

Optimal Task-Space Tracking with Minimum Manipulator Reconfiguration

Unified Motion/Force/Impedance Control for Manipulators in Unknown Contact Environments Based on Robust Model-Reaching Approach

Coordinated control of free-floating dual-arm space robots based on hybrid task-priority approach

Coordinated Motion Control of A Dual-Arm Space Robot with Joint-Limit Avoidance and Uncertain Inertial Parameters

Coordinated Control of a Dual-Arm Space Robot: Novel Models and Simulations for Robotic Control Methods

Online Trajectory Generation with Local Replanning for 7-Dof Serial Manipulator in Unforeseen Dynamic Environments

Strategy of smooth motion planning of multi-axes space manipulator avoiding dynamic singularity in Cartesian space

Predictive Multi-Agent-Based Planning and Landing Controller for Reactive Dual-Arm Manipulation

Sliding-Mode Guidance for Simultaneous Control of Impact Time and Angle

A nine-degree-of-freedom modular redundant robotic manipulator: Development and experimentation

Coordinated Control Based on Reinforcement Learning for Dual-Arm Continuum Manipulators in Space Capture Missions

Adaptive Reaction Null-Space Control of Dual-Arm Space Robot for Post-Capture of Non-Cooperative Target

Dual arm coordination of redundant space manipulators mounted on a spacecraft

Flexible Multibody Model and the Dynamics of the Deployment of Mesh Antennas

Coordinated motion control of a dual-arm space robot for assembling modular parts

Collision-Free Optimal Trajectory for a Controlled Floating Space Robot

Improving Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization by Adjoint Estimation with Shape-Based Path