Abstract:[Objective]Application of chemical nitrogen fertilizer and green manure is one of the important measures to improve crop yield and soil quality, but it also affects the soil bacterial community and its function, and thereby alters soil nutrient circulation. At present, there are few reports on whether long-term application of fertilizer nitrogen and green manure can improve diversity and functions of the soil microbia in the dryland soils. It is, therefore, of great significance to explore effects of application of chemical nitrogen fertilizer and green manure on the soil bacterial community and its functions.[Method]An eight-year-old winter wheat field experiment, designed to have three treatments: i.e. Treatment CK (control applied, with P2O5105 kg hm-2a-1), Treatment FP (applied with P2O5105 kg hm-2a-1, N150 kg hm-2a-1) and Treatment FGM (applied with P2O5105 kg hm-2a-1, N 150 kg hm-2a-1, plus green manure), laid out in a randomized block design,was carried out in Shaanxi Province, China. Soil samples were collected September 2016 for analysis of soil biochemical properties (pH, nitrate N, ammonium nitrogen, soil organic carbon (SOC), microbial biomass carbon(MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON)). The high throughput sequencing technique was used to determine 16S rRNA gene sequence in V4 zone of the soil bacteria, and in the end soil microbial community and its functions in the soil were analyzed. [Result]Results show that Treatment FP was 8.0% higher in SOC than CK, while Treatment FGM was 20.0% higher in SOC, 62.2% higher in MBC, 35.9% higher in MBN, 7.27% higher in DOC and 56.3% higher in DON. The average OTUs number of the three treatments was 3 792, and no significant difference was observed between the treatments in Chao1 index and Shannon index. In the soil bacterial community Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes,Gemmatimonadetes and Proteobacteria were dominant groups, regardless of treatments. However, at the genus level, Treatment FP was significantly lower than CK in abundances of Pseudoduganella, Steroidobacter, Adhaeribacter, Nordella and Ralstonia, while Treatment FGM was lower only in abundance of Lactobacillus but higher in abundance of Steroidobacter , Chryseolinea , Lentzea and Chitinophaga. Bacterial function prediction using FAPROTAX centered mainly on chemoheterotrophy, nitrification, ammonia oxidation, nitrite oxidation, and nitrate reduction, while the prediction using Tax4Fun did mainly on carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, membrane transport, signal transduction and energy metabolism.The three treatments did not vary much in functional fractionation. [Conclusion]All the findings in this experiment suggest that Treatment FP and Treatment FGM do not havemuch effects on bacterial richness, diversity and functions, while they do increase soil fertility, i.e. SOC, DOC and DON, by a certain degree.

Biofertilization alters the composition and interaction of the protistan community in the wheat rhizosphere under field con- ditions

Biofertilization Containing Paenibacillus Triticisoli BJ-18 Alters the Composition and Interaction of the Protistan Community in the Wheat Rhizosphere under Field Conditions.

Continuous Application of Different Fertilizers Induces Distinct Bulk and Rhizosphere Soil Protist Communities

Specific Protistan Consumers and Parasites Are Responsive to Inorganic Fertilization in Rhizosphere and Bulk Soils

Manure Application Increases Soil Bacterial and Fungal Network Complexity and Alters Keystone Taxa

Fertilization alters protistan consumers and parasites in crop‐associated microbiomes

Microbial Composition and Diversity Are Associated with Plant Performance: A Case Study on Long-Term Fertilization Effect on Wheat Growth in an Ultisol

Soil Protist Communities Form a Dynamic Hub in the Soil Microbiome.

Influence of Fertilization Methods and Types on Wheat Rhizosphere Microbiome Community and Functions.

Impact of Bio-Organic Fertilizer Incorporation on Soil Nutrients, Enzymatic Activity, and Microbial Community in Wheat–Maize Rotation System

Impacts of Inorganic and Organic Fertilization Treatments on Bacterial and Fungal Communities in A Paddy Soil

Effects of Different Fertilizers on Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities of Winter Wheat in the North China Plain

Microbial Amendments Alter Protist Communities Within the Soil Microbiome

The addition of biochar and nitrogen alters the microbial community and their cooccurrence network by affecting soil properties

Protists as main indicators and determinants of plant performance

Long-term chemical fertilization results in a loss of temporal dynamics of diazotrophic communities in the wheat rhizosphere

Long-term application of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers changes the process of community construction by affecting keystone species of crop rhizosphere microorganisms

Effects of Chemical Nitrogen Fertilizer and Green Manure on Diversity and Functions of Soil Bacteria in Wheat Field

Inorganic Chemical Fertilizer Application to Wheat Reduces the Abundance of Putative Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria

Long-term Fertilization Changes Bacterial Diversity and Bacterial Communities in the Maize Rhizosphere of Chinese Mollisols

Reduced Dependence of Rhizosphere Microbiome on Plant-Derived Carbon in 32-Year Long-Term Inorganic and Organic Fertilized Soils