Treatment Options and Efficacy Analysis of Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms Involving the Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery (Type Ⅱ): A Single Center's Experience of 70 Cases
Y.MAIMAITI,Gong CHEN,Ying-jun LIU,Yong-tao ZHENG,Jing-run LI,Yu LEI,Han-qiang JIANG,Wei NI,Yu-jun LIAO,Qing-zhu AN,Chao GAO,Feng XU,Yan-long TIAN,Bin XU,Yu-xiang GU,Bing LENG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0678.2017.02.004
2017-01-01
Abstract:Aim To study the treatment methods for PICA-involving (type Ⅱ) vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) and compare the efficacy of different endovascular procedures.Methods Between 2013 and 2015,70 patients with type Ⅱ VADA were treated at the authors' institution.According to clinical symptoms,12 patients were received conservative drug treatment [drug follow-up (control) group] and 58 patients were treated with endovascular methods (intervention group),which were further divided into a vocclusion sub-group (14 patients) and a vascular reconstructive sub-group (44 patients).Results The cure and improvement rate of different treatment methods were 18.2% (conservative treatment),69.2% (occlusion),47.2% (stent) and 80% (stent-assisted embolization) after a a-year follow-up.Recurrence rate was 18.2%,15.4%,11.8% and 5.0% in the four groups,respectively.Among the different numbers and types of stent methods,the cure and improvement rate were 57.1% (single-stent),69.2% (dual/ multi-stent) and 100% (flow-diverting stem).Recurrence rate was 9.5%,7.7% and zero in the three groups,respectively.Conclusion Endovascular treatment group had better outcome compared with conservative drug treatment group.And stent-assisted aneurysm embolization had a more favorable result compared with stent implantation.Further study with larger case series is necessary to validate whether different stent approaches have difference on efficacy and complications.