Treatment Options and Efficacy Analysis of Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms Involving the Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery (Type Ⅱ): A Single Center's Experience of 70 Cases

Y.MAIMAITI,Gong CHEN,Ying-jun LIU,Yong-tao ZHENG,Jing-run LI,Yu LEI,Han-qiang JIANG,Wei NI,Yu-jun LIAO,Qing-zhu AN,Chao GAO,Feng XU,Yan-long TIAN,Bin XU,Yu-xiang GU,Bing LENG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0678.2017.02.004
2017-01-01
Abstract:Aim To study the treatment methods for PICA-involving (type Ⅱ) vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) and compare the efficacy of different endovascular procedures.Methods Between 2013 and 2015,70 patients with type Ⅱ VADA were treated at the authors' institution.According to clinical symptoms,12 patients were received conservative drug treatment [drug follow-up (control) group] and 58 patients were treated with endovascular methods (intervention group),which were further divided into a vocclusion sub-group (14 patients) and a vascular reconstructive sub-group (44 patients).Results The cure and improvement rate of different treatment methods were 18.2% (conservative treatment),69.2% (occlusion),47.2% (stent) and 80% (stent-assisted embolization) after a a-year follow-up.Recurrence rate was 18.2%,15.4%,11.8% and 5.0% in the four groups,respectively.Among the different numbers and types of stent methods,the cure and improvement rate were 57.1% (single-stent),69.2% (dual/ multi-stent) and 100% (flow-diverting stem).Recurrence rate was 9.5%,7.7% and zero in the three groups,respectively.Conclusion Endovascular treatment group had better outcome compared with conservative drug treatment group.And stent-assisted aneurysm embolization had a more favorable result compared with stent implantation.Further study with larger case series is necessary to validate whether different stent approaches have difference on efficacy and complications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?