Endovascular Treatment Strategies for Aneurysms of the Origin of the Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery

Malvina Garner,Frederik Fries,Michael Kettner,Alena Haußmann,Armin Bachhuber,Wolfgang Reith,Umut Yilmaz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.01.044
Abstract:Background: Treatment of aneurysms at the origin of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) is challenging. Surgery is difficult due to the deep location and proximity to cranial nerves and endovascular treatment is complicated due to the often tortuous anatomy of the PICA and its small diameter. The purpose of this study is to report our experience with the endovascular treatment of aneurysms at the origin of the PICA. Methods: Consecutive patients with aneurysms at the origin of the PICA who were endovascularly treated at our department were identified from our registry of neuro-angiographies. Clinical, angiographic, and treatment data were analyzed. Endpoints included successful occlusion and recurrence. Results: Twenty-nine patients were included. 79.3% of the aneurysms were wide-neck with a dome-to-neck ratio <2.65.5% of all endovascular procedures were performed by coiling alone. The procedural rupture rate was 18.75% for endovascularly treated aneurysms presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Successful embolization was achieved non-significantly more often in the coiling-only group (94.7% vs. 70%, P = 0.066). Aneurysm recurrence after successful occlusion was observed in one case. Conclusions: Though aneurysm and parent vessel characteristics were challenging successful occlusion was achieved in a high rate of treatments, often with standalone coiling. Adjunctive techniques like retrograde stenting seem promising to further enhance endovascular results. Interestingly aneurysms arising solely from the origin of the PICA without the V4-segment involved presented with SAH significantly more often and wide-neck aneurysms presenting with SAH had a significantly higher periinterventional rupture rate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?