Abstract:Traditional methodologies for measuring visual distraction have been limiting in their approaches, treating distraction as a one-dimensional variable. This has been accomplished either by categorizing distraction as a binary variable or using surrogate measurements, such as reaction time in response to non-driving related tasks, which follow the procedures of measuring distraction from psychology. Furthermore, as human-vehicle interaction (HVI) under automated driving has the potential to provide safety information and bring visual distraction simultaneously, there lacks an investigation on the quantitative relationship between distraction and safety due to the restrained methodologies in measuring visual distraction. As HVI-induced driver distraction plays a critical role in determining safe driving under automated driving, a methodology is highly needed to comprehensively measure the visual distraction under automated driving so that its impact on safety can be further investigated. Therefore, sticking to the definition of visual distraction, this research aims to (1) improve the existing methodology in measuring HVI-induced driver distraction under automated driving by focusing on visual distraction and mathematically describing it from spatiotemporal and directional dimensions; (2) theoretically investigate how the quantified visual distraction influences driving safety and (3) quantify the relationship between distraction and safety with introducing the "distraction-safety" ratio. Drivers' fixation behaviors are used in quantifying visual distraction, which is measured by spatiotemporal and directional relationships between drivers' visual attention and the attention that indicates "zero distraction". Three newly added performance measures in quantifying HVI-induced visual distraction are real-time magnitudes, real-time directions, and intensities (cumulation of magnitudes over time). To validate the proposed methods, a verification study was conducted by recruiting drivers to test automated driving under Level 3 automation. Drivers are required to wear an eye-tracker and go through two scenarios interacting with jaywalkers where takeover actions are needed with two takeover warnings ("visual-only" and "visual & audible"). Per past studies, takeover time was measured in representing distraction level. As a result, this study confirms the validity of the proposed methods by revealing the significant and positive correlations between the measured distraction intensity and the takeover time. Discussions of the quantified visual distraction from the spatiotemporal and directional perspective further enhance the understanding of HVI-induced driver distraction under automated driving through multiple dimensions. Furthermore, this research reveals how distracted driving affects safety under automated driving through the takeover performance. Thresholds under visual distraction magnitudes and degrees that lead to traffic conflicts were identified. More importantly, a "distraction-safety" ratio that quantifies the relationship between visual distraction and safety benefits is proposed. The results suggest that the "visual & audible" is more effective in significantly enhancing safety while aggregating a significantly smaller amount of visual distraction. The contribution of this research is to re-define the methodological approach of measuring visual distraction by (1) measuring distraction multi-dimensionally and (2) establishing a "distraction-safety" system in quantitatively assessing the balance of safety benefits and the HVI-induced visual distraction magnitude under automated driving environment.

Computer Intelligent Evaluation Model and Algorithm Optimization of Driving Distraction from In-Vehicle Information System Secondary Tasks

Secondary hyperparathyroidism in uraemic patients on chronic haemodialysis--a case report and review.

In-Vehicle Information System and Driving Safety

Multitasking While Driving: How Drivers Self-Regulate Their Interaction with In-Vehicle Touchscreens in Automated Driving

Evaluation of Three In-Vehicle Interactions from Drivers' Driving Performance and Eye Movement Behavior.

How Do Drivers Self-Regulate their Secondary Task Engagements? The Effect of Driving Automation on Touchscreen Interactions and Glance Behavior

Designing Touchscreen Menu Interfaces for In-Vehicle Infotainment Systems: the Effect of Depth and Breadth Trade-off and Task Types on Visual-Manual Distraction

The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.

Detection of serum hepatitis C virus RNA

The Effect of Touchscreen Layout Division on the Usability and Driving Safety of In-Vehicle Information Systems

Color Block Task

Using Hierarchical Task Analysis to Compare Four Vehicle Manufacturers’ Infotainment Systems

Can open-source projects (re-)shape the SDN/NFV-driven telecommunication market?

Evaluation of Gesture-Based In-Vehicle Interaction: User Experience and the Potential to Reduce Driver Distraction

[Results of frequency analysis studies of first heart sounds with a computer program].

Assessing Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile

Transitioning to multi-dimensional estimation of visual distraction and its safety effects under automated driving: A spatiotemporal and directional estimation approach

In-Vehicle Human Machine Interface: Investigating the Effects of Tactile Displays on Information Presentation in Automated Vehicles

Impacts of information quantity and display formats on driving behaviors in a connected vehicle environment

Testing the Cognitive Load of Gesture Interaction on Drivers When Performing Tertiary Tasks

Region-dependent effects of acute and chronic tranylcypromine in vivo on [3H]2-BFI binding to brain imidazoline I(2) sites.