Secondary hyperparathyroidism in uraemic patients on chronic haemodialysis--a case report and review.

Y. Lim

Singapore Medical Journal

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

In-Vehicle Information System and Driving Safety

WANG Ying,ZHANG Wei,WU Su

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-7857.2009.13.020

2009-01-01

Abstract:As a fresh growth on technology and economy,new solutions of telematics,navigation,internet and entertainment while driving based on In-Vehicle Information System(IVIS) was applied widely in automobile industry recently.The process of automobile-informationization has been accelerated gradually.However,based on Multi-Resource Theory,the application of IVIS during driving in forms of display check and text input distracted drivers visually in certain degrees,which caused threats to driving safety by competing with major driving tasks on visual,cognitive and other resources.Previous research found that the glance frequency and duration from using IVIS related to crashes and traffic dangers directly,meanwhile,decreased driver's ability on detecting key road incidents and controlling vehicles.Thus the safety design of IVIS,which focused on human-machine interactive method and driver's behavioral character,was very important.General methodologies of such research include field test,simulation test and simple laboratory test.
Age-Related Differences in the Cognitive, Visual, and Temporal Demands of In-Vehicle Information Systems

Joel M. Cooper,Camille L. Wheatley,Madeleine M. McCarty,Conner J. Motzkus,Clara L. Lopes,Gus G. Erickson,Brian R. W. Baucom,William J. Horrey,David L. Strayer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01154

IF: 3.8

2020-06-03

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:In-vehicle information systems (IVIS) refer to a collection of features in vehicles that allow motorists to complete tasks (often unrelated to driving) while operating the vehicle. These systems may interfere, to a greater extent, with older drivers' ability to attend to the visual and cognitive demands of the driving environment. The current study sought to examine age-related differences in the visual, cognitive and temporal demands associated with IVIS interactions. Older and younger drivers completed a set of common tasks using the IVIS of a representative sample of six different vehicles while they drove along a low-density residential street. Evaluation measures included a Detection Response Task (DRT), to assess both cognitive and visual attention, and subjective measures following each condition using the NASA Task Load Index (TLX). Two age cohorts were evaluated: younger drivers between 21 and 36 years of age, and older drivers between 55 and 75 years of age. Participants completed experimental tasks involving interactions with the IVIS to achieve a specific goal (i.e., using the touch screen to tune the radio to a station; using voice commands to find a specified navigation destination, etc.). Performance of tasks varied according to different modes of interaction available in the vehicles. Older drivers took longer to complete tasks, were slower to react to stimuli, and reported higher task demand when interacting with IVIS. Older drivers stand to benefit the most from advancements in-vehicle technology, but ironically may struggle the most to use them. The results document significant age-related costs in the potential for distraction from IVIS interactions on the road.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Assessing Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile

David L. Strayer,Jonna Turrill,Joel M. Cooper,James R. Coleman,Nathan Medeiros-Ward,Francesco Biondi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815575149

2015-11-03

Abstract:Objective: The objective was to establish a systematic framework for measuring and understanding cognitive distraction in the automobile. Background: Driver distraction from secondary in-vehicle activities is increasingly recognized as a significant source of injuries and fatalities on the roadway. Method: Across three studies, participants completed eight in-vehicle tasks commonly performed by the driver of an automobile. Primary, secondary, subjective, and physiological measures were collected and integrated into a cognitive distraction scale. Results: In-vehicle activities, such as listening to the radio or an audio book, were associated with a low level of cognitive workload; the conversation activities of talking to a passenger in the vehicle or conversing with a friend on a handheld or hands-free cell phone were associated with a moderate level of cognitive workload; and using a speech-to-text interfaced e-mail system involved a high level of cognitive workload. Conclusion: The research established that there are significant impairments to driving that stem from the diversion of attention from the task of operating a motor vehicle and that the impairments to driving are directly related to the cognitive workload of these in-vehicle activities. Moreover, the adoption of voice-based systems in the vehicle may have unintended consequences that adversely affect traffic safety. Application: These findings can be used to help inform scientifically based policies on driver distraction, particularly as they relate to cognitive distraction stemming from the diversion of attention to other concurrent activities in the vehicle.
Evaluation of Gesture-Based In-Vehicle Interaction: User Experience and the Potential to Reduce Driver Distraction

Lisa Graichen,Matthias Graichen,Josef F. Krems

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818824253

2019-01-29

Abstract:Objective: We observe the effects of in-vehicle system gesture-based interaction versus touch-based interaction on driver distraction and user experience. Background: Driver distraction is a major problem for traffic safety, as it is a contributing factor to a number of accidents. Visual distraction in particular has a highly negative impact on the driver. One possibility for reducing visual driver distraction is to use new forms of interaction in the vehicle, such as gesture-based interaction. Method: In this experiment, participants drove on a motorway or in a city scenario while using touch-based interaction or gesture-based interaction. Subjective data, such as acceptance and workload, and objective data, including glance behavior, were gathered. Results: As a result, participants rated their subjective impressions of safe driving as higher when using gesture-based interaction. More specifically, acceptance and attractiveness were higher, and workload was lower. The participants performed significantly fewer glances to the display and the glances were much shorter. Conclusion: Gestures are a positive alternative for in-vehicle interaction since effects on driver distraction are less significant when compared to touch-based interaction. Application: Potential application of this research includes interaction design of typical in-vehicle information and entertainment functions.
The Effect of Touchscreen Layout Division on the Usability and Driving Safety of In-Vehicle Information Systems

Zhengxin Wu,Kaiyue Rao,Weixing Dou,Yixi Bao,Tao Jin,Zhengxin WuKaiyue RaoWeixing DouYixi BaoTao Jina School of Design,Jiangnan University,Wuxi,Chinab College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering,China University of Petroleum (East China),Qingdao,ChinaZhengxin Wu is a PhD candidate in the School of Design at Jiangnan University. He received an MS degree in the Department of Industrial Design from China University of Petroleum (East China) in 2022. His research interests include human-machine interaction,cognitive psychology,and user experience.Kaiyue Rao is a PhD candidate in the School of Design at Jiangnan University. Her research interests include service and experience design,interaction design,and design for sustainability.Weixing Dou is a PhD candidate in the School of Design in Jiangnan University. His research interests include In-Vehicle Interaction System (IVIS) and Human Reliability Analysis (HRA).Yixi Bao is currently a professor and doctoral supervisor in the School of Design from Jiangnan University. She mainly engages in advanced human–computer interaction,service and experience design,and sociology of design.Tao Jin is currently a professor and master's supervisor in the Department of Industrial Design at China University of Petroleum (East China). He mainly engages in industrial design,user experience,and neurodesign.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2338320

IF: 4.92

2024-04-16

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract:Compared to traditional physical controls, in-vehicle touchscreen interaction relies more on vision. Irrational In-Vehicle Information System (IVIS) interface layout design can lead to decreased driver performance and even serious traffic accidents. This study investigated the impact of IVIS layouts on usability and driving safety. We extracted and analyzed the current mainstream IVIS homepage layouts in the market and summarized four different layout structures. An experiment was conducted on a driving simulator to examine the usability of the IVIS layout design based on task reaction time, error rate, NASA-TLX (a subjective workload assessment scale developed by NASA), and subjective preference (PREF). The safety issues of IVIS layout design were also examined based on standard deviation lane position (SDLP), speed variation (SV), mean glance time, mean number of glances, and blink frequency. This study recorded and evaluated the driving performance of 40 participants during real driving tasks at four speeds (0, 60, 90, and 120 km/h). Results showed that there were significant differences in task reaction time, NASA-TLX, PREF, mean glance time, SDLP, and SV among the four layouts. Furthermore, we observed that these four layouts had varying effects on usability and driving safety at four speeds. In the stationary state, the three-partition layouts were more efficient, while the two-partition layouts had more advantages during driving. Meanwhile, the horizontal dock bar layout interfaces have more advantages compared to the vertical dock bar interface. The study provides empirical evidence for optimizing the IVIS interface layout design for enhanced usability and driving safety.

computer science, cybernetics,ergonomics
Evaluation of Three In-Vehicle Interactions from Drivers' Driving Performance and Eye Movement Behavior.

Guofa Li,Fangping Zhu,Tingru Zhang,Ying Wang,Shengfan He,Xingda Qu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/itsc.2018.8569917

2018-01-01

Abstract:Although in-vehicle interaction technologies offer assistances for drivers from multi-aspects, the distractions that may cause by these technologies would significantly challenge driving safety. This study examined the influences of three in-vehicle interactions on drivers' driving performance and eye movement behavior. The three in-vehicle interactions include phone pick-up (PPU), Bluetooth and audio (BT+AUD) and Bluetooth and head-up display (BT+HUD). A control group (i.e., None, in which no human-machine interaction was included while driving) was designed to highlight the influences of the examined interactions. Fourteen licensed drivers participated in the simulation experiments. Their age ranged from 20 to 30 years old (Mean±SD=25.1±3.8). They were required to complete the Location Based Service (LBS) tasks using the three interactions while driving. Both driving performance and eye movement data were collected for analysis. Results showed that, when using PPU or BT+HUD, the minimum throttle opening, the steering wheel angle (SWA) and the Shannon entropy (SE) of SWA were all greater than those values when using BT+AUD or None. As for the SE of throttle opening and all the examined eye movement features (frequency and duration of fixation/saccade), the values when using BT+AUD or BT+HUD were higher than the values when using PPU or None. The presented results in this study provide evidences for car manufactures to design better BT +AUD human-machine interaction systems as a priority strategy.
Can open-source projects (re-)shape the SDN/NFV-driven telecommunication market?

W. Tavernier,Bram Naudts,D. Colle,M. Pickavet,S. Verbrugge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2015-0026

2015-10-28

it - Information Technology

Abstract:Abstract Telecom network operators face rapidly changing business needs. Due to their dependence on long product cycles they lack the ability to quickly respond to changing user demands. To spur innovation and stay competitive, network operators are investigating technological solutions with a proven track record in other application domains such as open source software projects. Open source software enables parties to learn, use, or contribute to technology from which they were previously excluded. OSS has reshaped many application areas including the landscape of operating systems and consumer software. The paradigm shift in telecommunication systems towards Software-Defined Networking introduces possibilities to benefit from open source projects. Implementing the control part of networks in software enables speedier adaption and innovation, and less dependencies on legacy protocols or algorithms hard-coded in the control part of network devices. The recently proposed concept of Network Function Virtualization pushes the softwarization of telecommunication functionalities even further down to the data plane. Within the NFV paradigm, functionality which was previously reserved for dedicated hardware implementations can now be implemented in software and deployed on generic Commercial Off-The Shelf (COTS) hardware. This paper provides an overview of existing open source initiatives for SDN/NFV-based network architectures, involving infrastructure to orchestration-related functionality. It situates them in a business process context and identifies the pros and cons for the market in general, as well as for individual actors.
The effects of using taxi-hailing application on driving performance

Xiexing Feng,Libo Cao,Yunxian Zhang,Hongbo Gao,Lifan Tan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881419830216

IF: 1.714

2019-01-01

International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems

Abstract:Driver distraction has become a major threat to the road safety, and the globally booming taxi-hailing application introduces new source of distraction to drivers. Although various in-vehicle information systems have been studied extensively, no documentation exists objectively measuring the extent to which interacting with taxi-hailing application during driving impacts drivers’ behavior. To fill this gap, a simulator-based study was conducted to synthetically compare the effects that different output modalities (visual, audio, and combined visual–audio) and input modalities (baseline, manual, and speech) imposed on the driving performance. The results show that the visual output introduced more negative effects on driving performance compared to audio output. In the combined output, visual component dominated the effects imposed on the longitudinal control and hazard detection; audio component only exacerbated the negative effects of visual component on the lateral control. Speech input modality was overall less detrimental to driving performance than manual input modality, especially reflected in the drivers’ quicker reaction to hazard events. The visual–manual interaction modality most severely impaired the hazard detecting ability, while also led to strong compensative behaviors. The audio–speech and visual–speech modality associated with more smooth lateral control and faster response to hazard events, respectively, compared to other modality. These results could be applied to improve the design of not only the taxi-hailing application but also other input–output balanced in-vehicle information systems.

robotics
Analysis of influence on driver behaviour while using in‐vehicle traffic lights with application of head‐up display

Bo Yang,Rencheng Zheng,Yuandong Yin,Shigeyuki Yamabe,Kimihiko Nakano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2015.0179

IF: 2.7

2016-06-01

IET Intelligent Transport Systems

Abstract:Emerging vehicular communication makes it possible to provide traffic light information to drivers inside vehicles with the application of in‐vehicle devices. However, the effect of this method on driver behaviour is still unclear, and there is concern that the application of in‐vehicle traffic lights may result in driver distraction. This study proposed two modes of in‐vehicle traffic lights to assist drivers: a ‘current’ mode providing real‐time information of the upcoming ground traffic lights, and a ‘predicted’ mode offering predicted information regarding ground traffic lights, taking into account the time to arrival at the upcoming intersection. Two kinds of in‐vehicle devices were compared for displaying in‐vehicle traffic lights: a normal 4.3‐inch display and a head‐up display. A driving simulator experiment was executed for 11 subjects, and driver behaviour was evaluated for driving operations and eye‐gaze behaviour. The results demonstrated that disruptive braking and accelerating operations were significantly reduced under the predicted mode, and glance time was significantly shorter for the head‐up display than for the normal 4.3‐inch display. The authors concluded that the predicted mode easily prompts drivers to ecological driving, and that the head‐up display is reliable for providing in‐vehicle traffic light information.

engineering, electrical & electronic,transportation science & technology
Sonically-enhanced in-vehicle air gesture interactions: evaluation of different spearcon compression rates

Moustafa Tabbarah,Yusheng Cao,Ziming Fang,Lingyu Li,Myounghoon Jeon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-024-00430-3

2024-05-20

Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces

Abstract:Driver distraction is a major contributor to road vehicle crashes, and visual distraction caused by using in-vehicle infotainment systems (IVIS) degrades driving performance and increases crash risk. Air gesture interfaces have been developed to mitigate driver distraction, and using auditory displays showed a decrease in off-road glances and an improved perceived workload. However, the potential of auditory display was not fully investigated. The present paper presents directional research in the design of auditory displays for air-gesture IVIS through a dual-task experiment of driving a simulator and air-gesture menu navigation. Twenty-four participants utilized the in-vehicle air gesture interfaces while driving with four auditory display conditions (text-to-speech, 70% compressed spearcons, 40% compressed spearcson, and no sound). The results showed that 70% spearcon reduced visual distraction and increased menu navigation accuracy but with increased navigation time. 70% spearcon was most preferred by the participants. Driving performance or workload did not show any difference among the conditions. Implications are discussed with the design guidelines for future implementations.

computer science, cybernetics, artificial intelligence
The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard

Avinoam Borowsky,William J Horrey,Yulan Liang,Angela Garabet,Lucinda Simmons,Donald L Fisher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.028

Abstract:Driver visual distraction is known to increase the likelihood of being involved in a crash, especially for long glances inside the vehicle. The detrimental impact of these in-vehicle glances may carry over and disrupt the ongoing processing of information after the driver glances back up on the road. This study explored the effect of different types of visual tasks inside the vehicle on the top-down processes that guide the detection and monitoring of road hazards after the driver glances back towards the road. Using a driving simulator, 56 participants were monitored with an eye tracking system while they navigated various hazardous scenarios in one of four experimental conditions. In all conditions, a potential hazard was visible 4-5s before the driver could strike the potential hazard were it to materialize. All interruptions were exactly two seconds in length. After the interruption the potential hazard again became visible for about a half-second after which the driver passed by the hazard. The nature of the in-vehicle visual interruption presented to the participants was varied across conditions: (1) Visual interruptions comprised of spatial, driving unrelated, tasks; (2) visual interruptions comprised of non-spatial, driving unrelated, tasks; (3) visual interruptions with no tasks added; and (4) no visual interruptions. In the first three conditions drivers glancing on the forward roadway was momentarily interrupted (either with or without a task) just after the potential hazard first became visible by the occurrence of an in-vehicle task lasting two seconds. In the last condition (no interruptions) the driver could not see the potential hazard after it just became visible because of obstructions in the built or natural environment. The obstruction (like the interruption) lasted for two seconds. In other words, across all conditions the hazard was visible, then became invisible, and finally became visible again. Importantly, the results show that the presence of an interruption (as opposed to an obstruction) negatively impacted drivers' ability to anticipate the potential hazard. Moreover, the various types of interruptions had differential effects on hazard detection. The implications of this study for the design of in-vehicle displays are discussed.
Designing Touchscreen Menu Interfaces for In-Vehicle Infotainment Systems: the Effect of Depth and Breadth Trade-off and Task Types on Visual-Manual Distraction

Louveton Nicolas,McCall Rod,Engel Thomas

2024-04-17

Abstract:Multitasking with a touch screen user-interface while driving is known to impact negatively driving performance and safety. Literature shows that list scrolling interfaces generate more visual-manual distraction than structured menus and sequential navigation. Depth and breadth trade-offs for structured navigation have been studied. However, little is known on how secondary task characteristics interact with those trade-offs. In this study, we make the hypothesis that both menu's depth and task complexity interact in generating visual-manual distraction. Using a driving simulation setup, we collected telemetry and eye-tracking data to evaluate driving performance. Participants were multitasking with a mobile app, presenting a range of eight depth and breadth trade-offs under three types of secondary tasks, involving different cognitive operations (Systematic reading, Search for an item, Memorize items' state). The results confirm our hypothesis. Systematic interaction with menu items generated a visual demand that increased with menu's depth, while visual demand reach an optimum for Search and Memory tasks. We discuss implications for design: In a multitasking context, display design effectiveness must be assessed while considering menu's layout but also cognitive processes involved.

Human-Computer Interaction
In-Vehicle Human Machine Interface: Investigating the Effects of Tactile Displays on Information Presentation in Automated Vehicles

Kimberly D. Martinez,Gaojian Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3205022

IF: 3.9

2022-09-17

IEEE Access

Abstract:Background: Semi-autonomous vehicles still require human drivers to take over when the automated systems can no longer perform the driving task. Objective: The goal of this study was to design and test the effects of six meaningful tactile signal types, representing six driving scenarios (i.e., navigation, speed, surrounding vehicles, over the speed limit, headway reductions, and pedestrian status) respectively, and two pattern durations (lower and higher urgencies), on drivers' perception and performance during automated driving. Methods: Sixteen volunteers participated in an experiment utilizing a medium-fidelity driving simulator presenting vibrotactile signals via 20 tactors embedded in the seat back, pan, and belt. Participants completed four separate driving sessions with 30 tactile signals presented randomly throughout each drive. Reaction times (RT), interpretation accuracy, and subjective ratings were measured. Results: Results illustrated shorter RTs and higher intuitive ratings for higher urgency patterns than lower urgency patterns. Pedestrian status and headway reduction signals were associated with shorter RTs and increased confidence ratings, compared to other tactile signal types. Lastly, among six tactile signals, surrounding vehicle and navigation signal types had the highest interpretation accuracy. Conclusion: These results will be used as preliminary data for future studies that aim to investigate the effects of meaningful tactile displays on automated vehicle takeover performance in complex situations (e.g., urban areas) where actual takeovers are required. The findings of this study will inform the design of next-generation in-vehicle human-machine interfaces.

computer science, information systems,telecommunications,engineering, electrical & electronic
Impacts of information quantity and display formats on driving behaviors in a connected vehicle environment

Wenjing Zhao,Siyuan Gong,Dezong Zhao,Fenglin Liu,N N Sze,Mohammed Quddus,Helai Huang,Xiangmo Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107621

Abstract:The emerging connected vehicle (CV) technologies facilitate the development of integrated advanced driver assistance systems (ADASs), with which various functions are coordinated in a comprehensive framework. However, challenges arise in enabling drivers to perceive important information with minimal distractions when multiple messages are simultaneously provided by integrated ADASs. To this end, this study introduces three types of human-machine interfaces (HMIs) for an integrated ADAS: 1) three messages using a visual display only, 2) four messages using a visual display only, and 3) three messages using visual plus auditory displays. Meanwhile, the differences in driving performance across three HMI types are examined to investigate the impacts of information quantity and display formats on driving behaviors. Additionally, variations in drivers' responses to the three HMI types are examined. Driving behaviors of 51 drivers with respect to three HMI types are investigated in eight field testing scenarios. These scenarios include warnings for rear-end collision, lateral collision, forward collision, lane-change, and curve speed, as well as notifications for emergency events downstream, the specified speed limit, and car-following behaviors. Results indicate that, compared to a visual display only, presenting three messages through visual and auditory displays enhances driving performance in four typical scenarios. Compared to the presentation of three messages, a visual display offering four messages improves driving performance in rear-end collision warning scenarios but diminishes the performance in lane-change scenarios. Additionally, the relationship between information quantity and display formats shown on HMIs and driving performance can be moderated by drivers' gender, occupation, driving experience, annual driving distance, and safety attitudes. Findings are indicative to designers in automotive industries in developing HMIs for future CVs.
The Effects of Head-Up Display Clutter and In-Vehicle Display Separation on Concurrent Driving Performance

William J. Horrey,Christopher D. Wickens,Amy L. Alexander

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120304701610

2003-10-01

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting

Abstract:The introduction of new in-vehicle technologies (IVTs) in automobiles may have important implications for driver safety, especially to the extent that these devices interfere with the primary driving task. Two experiments explored the effects of IVTs on vehicle control and hazard awareness: specifically, we were interested in the impact of visual clutter from head-up display (HUD) overlay as well as the impact of display separation. In experiment 1, twenty-five drivers in a wrap-around simulator drove urban and rural routes while performing a phone number read-back task. Visual displays were located either in a HUD overlaid on the horizon, a HUD positioned 7° below the horizon, or on a head-down display (HDD) located near the mid-console. Experiment 2 attempted to replicate some of the key findings in Experiment 1 with more challenging driving conditions (i.e., curved roads, varying fog densities). In general, the results suggested that drivers protected the vehicle control task, however there were costs in hazard response time and side task performance with the HDD. We suggest that effective hazard detection requires more focal visual resources whereas vehicle control may utilize ambient resources. The practical and theoretical significance of these findings are discussed.

English Else
How Do Drivers Self-Regulate their Secondary Task Engagements? The Effect of Driving Automation on Touchscreen Interactions and Glance Behavior

Patrick Ebel,Moritz Berger,Christoph Lingenfelder,Andreas Vogelsang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.04284

IF: 6.4588

2022-07-09

Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract:With ever-improving driver assistance systems and large touchscreens becoming the main in-vehicle interface, drivers are more tempted than ever to engage in distracting non-driving-related tasks. However, little research exists on how driving automation affects drivers' self-regulation when interacting with center stack touchscreens. To investigate this, we employ multilevel models on a real-world driving dataset consisting of 10,139 sequences. Our results show significant differences in drivers' interaction and glance behavior in response to varying levels of driving automation, vehicle speed, and road curvature. During partially automated driving, drivers are not only more likely to engage in secondary touchscreen tasks, but their mean glance duration toward the touchscreen also increases by 12% (Level 1) and 20% (Level 2) compared to manual driving. We further show that the effect of driving automation on drivers' self-regulation is larger than that of vehicle speed and road curvature. The derived knowledge can facilitate the safety evaluation of infotainment systems and the development of context-aware driver monitoring systems.
The Effects of V2V Information on Visual Attention and Driving Performance of the Drivers

Hao CHEN,Pei-Luen RAU,Zhi GUO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13837/j.issn.1006-8309.2017.04.0008

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective Inter-vehicle information comes from inter-vehicle communication and plays an important role in driving assistance.The present study aims to explore the effect of information channel,information complexity and driving scenarios on visual attention and driving performance.Methods 3 (information complexity:no,simple,complex) * 2 (information channel:visual,auditory) * 2 (driving scenarios:longitudinal,horizontal,turning) mixed experiment design was applied,visual attention and driving performance index were dependent variables,and 60 drivers were recruited and divided into two groups:visual and auditory group respectively.Results (1) auditory information improved drivers'the stability of driving and steering control and did not impaired the visual attention of drivers,but visual information had an opposite effect;(2) simple information also improved drivers'the stability of driving,and steering control and impaired the visual attention of drivers to the safe and central road area only in visual form.Conclusion simple auditory information is suitable for the longitudinal and horizontal trajectory scenarios,while inter-vehicle information was not suitable for turning scenario.
Using Hierarchical Task Analysis to Compare Four Vehicle Manufacturers’ Infotainment Systems

Ian J. Reagan,David G. Kidd

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571333

2013-09-01

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting

Abstract:Mobile technology has become pervasive in the driving environment, and its use has been linked to increased crash risk. Of particular concern are devices that place visual-manual demands on drivers. In response, auto manufacturers have started equipping vehicles with technology that allows occupants to interact with manufacturer-installed functions and portable devices using speech commands instead of traditional visual-manual inputs. Although voice interfaces alleviate competition for visual resources, they impose cognitive demand that can degrade driving performance, especially if they are too demanding. Hierarchical task analyses were performed for a set of in-vehicle tasks using visual-manual and auditoryvocal interfaces for four different production systems in 2013 model year vehicles to assess the number of steps required to complete the tasks. In general, tasks performed using voice interfaces could be completed in fewer operations than when performed visual-manually. However, in some instances, the voice interfaces required more operations than the visual-manual interfaces. The additional operations resulted from the inability to chain multiple speech commands and verification of speech commands. Allowing chained voice commands reduces the number of operations required to complete a task and should reduce task time and overall cognitive demand. Verification steps likely reduce error but may impose a greater working memory load than generating speech commands and, in some cases, may exceed the limitations of working memory. The findings from this study will be used in a larger field study examining cognitive demand associated with different voice interface designs and the effect on driving and secondary task performance.
Transitioning to multi-dimensional estimation of visual distraction and its safety effects under automated driving: A spatiotemporal and directional estimation approach

Song Wang,Zhixia Li,Chao Zeng,Jia Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2023.104212

2023-06-29

Abstract:Traditional methodologies for measuring visual distraction have been limiting in their approaches, treating distraction as a one-dimensional variable. This has been accomplished either by categorizing distraction as a binary variable or using surrogate measurements, such as reaction time in response to non-driving related tasks, which follow the procedures of measuring distraction from psychology. Furthermore, as human-vehicle interaction (HVI) under automated driving has the potential to provide safety information and bring visual distraction simultaneously, there lacks an investigation on the quantitative relationship between distraction and safety due to the restrained methodologies in measuring visual distraction. As HVI-induced driver distraction plays a critical role in determining safe driving under automated driving, a methodology is highly needed to comprehensively measure the visual distraction under automated driving so that its impact on safety can be further investigated. Therefore, sticking to the definition of visual distraction, this research aims to (1) improve the existing methodology in measuring HVI-induced driver distraction under automated driving by focusing on visual distraction and mathematically describing it from spatiotemporal and directional dimensions; (2) theoretically investigate how the quantified visual distraction influences driving safety and (3) quantify the relationship between distraction and safety with introducing the "distraction-safety" ratio. Drivers' fixation behaviors are used in quantifying visual distraction, which is measured by spatiotemporal and directional relationships between drivers' visual attention and the attention that indicates "zero distraction". Three newly added performance measures in quantifying HVI-induced visual distraction are real-time magnitudes, real-time directions, and intensities (cumulation of magnitudes over time). To validate the proposed methods, a verification study was conducted by recruiting drivers to test automated driving under Level 3 automation. Drivers are required to wear an eye-tracker and go through two scenarios interacting with jaywalkers where takeover actions are needed with two takeover warnings ("visual-only" and "visual & audible"). Per past studies, takeover time was measured in representing distraction level. As a result, this study confirms the validity of the proposed methods by revealing the significant and positive correlations between the measured distraction intensity and the takeover time. Discussions of the quantified visual distraction from the spatiotemporal and directional perspective further enhance the understanding of HVI-induced driver distraction under automated driving through multiple dimensions. Furthermore, this research reveals how distracted driving affects safety under automated driving through the takeover performance. Thresholds under visual distraction magnitudes and degrees that lead to traffic conflicts were identified. More importantly, a "distraction-safety" ratio that quantifies the relationship between visual distraction and safety benefits is proposed. The results suggest that the "visual & audible" is more effective in significantly enhancing safety while aggregating a significantly smaller amount of visual distraction. The contribution of this research is to re-define the methodological approach of measuring visual distraction by (1) measuring distraction multi-dimensionally and (2) establishing a "distraction-safety" system in quantitatively assessing the balance of safety benefits and the HVI-induced visual distraction magnitude under automated driving environment.

transportation science & technology
Multitasking While Driving: How Drivers Self-Regulate Their Interaction with In-Vehicle Touchscreens in Automated Driving

Patrick Ebel,Christoph Lingenfelder,Andreas Vogelsang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2215634

IF: 4.92

2023-06-06

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract:Driver assistance systems are designed to increase comfort and safety by automating parts of the driving task. At the same time, modern in-vehicle information systems with large touchscreens provide the driver with numerous options for entertainment, information, or communication, and are a potential source of distraction. However, little is known about how driving automation affects how drivers interact with the center stack touchscreen, i.e., how drivers self-regulate their behavior in response to different levels of driving automation. To investigate this, we apply multilevel models to a real-world driving dataset consisting of 31,378 sequences. Our results show significant differences in drivers' interaction and glance behavior in response to different levels of driving automation, vehicle speed, and road curvature. During automated driving, drivers perform more interactions per touchscreen sequence and increase the time spent looking at the center stack touchscreen. Specifically, at higher levels of driving automation (level 2), the mean glance duration toward the center stack touchscreen increases by 36% and the mean number of interactions per sequence increases by 17% compared to manual driving. Furthermore, partially automated driving has a strong impact on the use of more complex UI elements (e.g., maps) and touch gestures (e.g., multitouch). We also show that the effect of driving automation on drivers' self-regulation is greater than that of vehicle speed and road curvature. The derived knowledge can inform the design and evaluation of touch-based infotainment systems and the development of context-aware driver monitoring systems.

computer science, cybernetics,ergonomics

Secondary hyperparathyroidism in uraemic patients on chronic haemodialysis--a case report and review.

In-Vehicle Information System and Driving Safety

Age-Related Differences in the Cognitive, Visual, and Temporal Demands of In-Vehicle Information Systems

Assessing Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile

Evaluation of Gesture-Based In-Vehicle Interaction: User Experience and the Potential to Reduce Driver Distraction

The Effect of Touchscreen Layout Division on the Usability and Driving Safety of In-Vehicle Information Systems

Evaluation of Three In-Vehicle Interactions from Drivers' Driving Performance and Eye Movement Behavior.

Can open-source projects (re-)shape the SDN/NFV-driven telecommunication market?

The effects of using taxi-hailing application on driving performance

Analysis of influence on driver behaviour while using in‐vehicle traffic lights with application of head‐up display

Sonically-enhanced in-vehicle air gesture interactions: evaluation of different spearcon compression rates

The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard

Designing Touchscreen Menu Interfaces for In-Vehicle Infotainment Systems: the Effect of Depth and Breadth Trade-off and Task Types on Visual-Manual Distraction

In-Vehicle Human Machine Interface: Investigating the Effects of Tactile Displays on Information Presentation in Automated Vehicles

Impacts of information quantity and display formats on driving behaviors in a connected vehicle environment

The Effects of Head-Up Display Clutter and In-Vehicle Display Separation on Concurrent Driving Performance

How Do Drivers Self-Regulate their Secondary Task Engagements? The Effect of Driving Automation on Touchscreen Interactions and Glance Behavior

The Effects of V2V Information on Visual Attention and Driving Performance of the Drivers

Using Hierarchical Task Analysis to Compare Four Vehicle Manufacturers’ Infotainment Systems

Transitioning to multi-dimensional estimation of visual distraction and its safety effects under automated driving: A spatiotemporal and directional estimation approach

Multitasking While Driving: How Drivers Self-Regulate Their Interaction with In-Vehicle Touchscreens in Automated Driving