Estimating Annual Residential Exposure Averages by Extrapolating Snapshot PM2.5 Campaign Results and Translating Ambient Measurements

ZHANG H,FAN Y,HAN Y,YAN L,CAI Y,CHEN W,CHAN Q,ZHU T,KELLY F,BARRATT B
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ee9.0000611216.56215.84
2019-01-01
Environmental Epidemiology
Abstract:TPS 652: Air pollution exposure modeling 2, Exhibition Hall, Ground floor, August 28, 2019, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Introduction Panel studies have demonstrated associations between acute and chronic health effects and air pollution. One main limitation of such associations lies in the representativeness of short-term exposure to one's daily true exposure. In this project, we aimed to create an empirical model that allows extrapolation of snapshot campaign results and translation of ambient PM2.5 measurements into annual averages, using residential PM2.5 exposures as an example. Methods: A total number of 72 subjects participated in the indoor monitoring of PM2.5 for 48 hours at their residences in urban and rural Beijing during winter 2016 and summer 2017. An automated classification algorithm was developed to separate residential exposure into indoor and outdoor origins, which allows calculation for infiltration efficiency (F (inf)) and net indoor contribution (Δin) from each origin, respectively. Multiple linear regression models were built between home characteristics, F_(inf) and Δin, to estimate annual exposure averages. Results: During winter 2016, the median Δin and F_(inf) were 42.6 (IQR: 32.2-66.7) µg/m^3 and 0.57 (IQR: 0.51-0.69) for rural subjects, 24.1 (IQR: 10.3-38.4) µg/m^3 and 0.42 (IQR: 0.32-0.55) for urban subjects. During summer 2017, the median Δin and F_(inf) were 19.4 (IQR: 11.7-36.3) µg/m^3 and 0.7 (IQR: 0.61-0.76) µg/m^3 for rural subjects, 2.6 (IQR: 0-7.5) µg/m^3 and 0.58 (IQR: 0.4-0.7) for urban subjects. There were significant seasonal differences for rural and urban sites (p < 0.05), and significant differences between rural and urban sites for each season (p < 0.05). The models are currently under development and only preliminary results were presented. Conclusions: The developed method is able to estimate annual exposure averages by extrapolating short-term campaign results and translating ambient measurements. It has the potential to enhance the strength of research evidence of health effects from panel studies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?