Quantifying PM2.5 Exposure from Residential Source According to Fuel Uses in Highly Polluted Ambient Environment

Hanbin Zhang,Yunfei Fan,Yiqun Han,Li Yan,Yutong Cai,Bingling Zhou,Wu Chen,Queenie Chan,Tong Zhu,Frank Kelly,Benjamin Barratt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/isesisee.2018.p01.1430
2018-01-01
ISEE Conference Abstracts
Abstract:Background Many studies have reported residential PM2.5 concentrations in association with fuel uses. Yet it remains a challenge to identify and quantify PM2.5 from residential sources in real-time exposure datasets. Censoring algorithms, which were usually used in infiltration factor calculation, could be useful for this exercise.Methods Thirty-seven senior non-smoker participants in an urban or a rural site of Beijing have completed residential exposure monitoring for at least 43 hours, during Nov-Dec 2016 (winter) and May-Jun 2017 (summer). Residential PM2.5 was measured in subjects’ bedrooms using nephelometers. Corresponding outdoor PM2.5 concentrations were measured by reference monitors. A censoring algorithm (Allen et al., 2003) was applied to select data points when a residential source of pollution was identified. The ratios between residential and outdoor (R/O ratio) PM2.5 for these subjects were compared according to their fuel use information.Results In summer, subjects who used biomass for cooking have significantly higher average R/O ratio to PM2.5 than those who used non-biomass (p<0.05). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) R/O ratio during summer for biomass and non-biomass users were 1.5(0.5) and 1.1(1.0). The mean (SD) residential PM2.5 concentrations during summer for biomass and non-biomass users were 49.7(34.7) and 36.7(21.4) μg/m3. In winter, subjects who used solid fuel (biomass or coal) for heating have significantly higher average R/O ratio to PM2.5 than those who used alternative energy (electricity or central heating) (p<0.05). Mean (SD) R/O ratio during winter for solid fuel and alternative energy users were 3.2(3.6) and 1.6(1.1). The mean (SD) residential PM2.5 concentrations during winter for solid fuel and alternative energy users were 315.7(313.4) and 147.8(52.2) μg/m3.Conclusions Censoring algorithms from infiltration studies can be effective in quantifying residential source of pollution, even in highly polluted ambient environments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?