Personal Exposure to PM2.5 and Its Inflammatory Effect on Local Residents in Urban and Rural Beijing, China

Han Y,Chatzidiakou L,Yan L,Chen W,Cai Y,Wu Y,Liu J,Chan Q,Kelly F,Zhu T
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ee9.0000607420.84365.3e
2019-01-01
Environmental Epidemiology
Abstract:TPS 911: Air pollution, epigenetics, biomarkers, Exhibition Hall, Ground floor, August 26, 2019, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Introduction Owing to diverse air pollution sources, socio-economic and personal activity patterns, residents in urban and rural areas may be exposed to varying concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), resulting in distinct health responses. Here, we compare personal exposure of PM2.5 from urban and rural setting using data from AIRLESS project and investigate the associations between PM2.5 and respiratory and systemic inflammatory biomarkers. Methods In total, 123 urban and 128 rural non-smoking subjects aged 40-70 years were recruited from two well-established cohorts in Beijing to allow a panel-study design. During Nov-Dec 2016 and May-Jun 2017, each subject was instructed to carry a validated personal air monitor (PAM) to measure PM2.5 concentration at high spatiotemporal resolution for consecutive seven days in each campaign. During the participated week, each subject completed two clinical measurements of exhaled NO (FeNO) and blood monocytes counts on Day3 and Day7. The associations between personal exposure to PM2.5 and health outcomes were examined with linear mixed-effect models with adjustment for demographic, socio-economic, lifestyle and meteorological variables. Results The weekly mean concentrations (standard deviation [SD]) of personal exposure to PM2.5 during the winter and summer campaign were 64.1(35.4) and 34.3(12.3) μg/m3 in rural subjects, higher than those of 33.8(18.9) and 28.7(9.9) μg/m3 experienced by the urban subjects. An IQR increase in previous 1-day personal exposure to PM2.5 (26.1 μg/m3) was significantly associated with elevated FeNO [7.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.0-10.8%)] and monocyte counts [0.6%(CI: 0.3-0.9%)] (p<0.05). The PM2.5-associated changes in FeNO and monocyte counts were 6.0% and 0.2% in rural subjects, lower than those of 9.3% and 0.7% in urban subjects, respectively. Conclusions Compared with urban residents, rural residents in Beijing have a higher personal exposure to PM2.5 in both winter and summer, but lower PM2.5-associated respiratory and systemic inflammatory responses.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?