Acute Effects of Personal Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter on Blood Pressure

Yan L,Han Y,Chatzidiakou L,Cai S,Wu Y,Barratt B,Chan Q,Jones R,Zhu T,Kelly F
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ee9.0000611092.94333.35
2019-01-01
Environmental Epidemiology
Abstract:OPS 45: Cardiometabolic effects of air pollution, Room 117, Floor 1, August 26, 2019, 10:30 AM - 12:00 PM Background and Aim Evidence on the relationship between exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and blood pressure (BP) is inconsistent. We aimed to examine the acute effects of personal exposure to PM2.5 on BP in populations. Methods: During Nov-Dec 2016 (winter) and May-Jun 2017 (summer), 251 participants aged 40-70 years living in an urban (N=123) or a rural (N=128) site of Beijing were enrolled into a panel study (AIRLESS). Personal exposures to PM2.5 were measured for 7 consecutive days in each season with a personal air monitor (PAM). The PAM measurements have been validated by comparison against stationary reference monitors. Twelve seated BP measurements were taken across 4 visits at the clinics for each participant (2 visits to the clinics at Day 3 and 7 per the week-long campaign). The association between PM2.5 and BP was examined with a linear mixed-effects model adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic status (SES) and lifestyle parameters, temperature and relative humidity. Results: The weekly mean concentrations (standard deviation [SD]) of personal exposure to PM2.5 during winter and summer campaign were 33.8(18.9) and 28.7(9.9) μg/m3 in participants of the urban site and 64.1(35.4) and 34.3(12.3) μg/m3 of the rural site, respectively. Preliminary analyses indicate that increased personal exposure to PM2.5 (per interquartile range [IQR] increase: 26.1-29.1 μg/m3) during the prior 1-3 days was significantly associated with elevated systolic BP ranging from 1.0 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.3-1.6) to 1.4 mmHg (0.8-1.9), after adjusting for covariates (all p<0.001). Similar results were found for diastolic BP. However, the association between PM2.5 and BP was no longer statistically significant after further adjustment for personal measurements of temperature and relative humidity. Conclusions: Personal PM2.5 exposures may exert small adverse effects on BP, but this positive association was attenuated by adjustments of the current temperature and relative humidity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?