Abstract:Past studies of China’s participation in World War Ⅰ have mainly focused on the conflicts between the government and the parliament, between various cliques, and between South and North, and have mainly been critical of joining the war. It is necessary to explore the problem from the angle of diplomatic history. At the beginning of the European war, the Peking government declared a policy of neutrality. The policy seems appropriate at first glance, but in the special situation faced by China at the time, it contained the seeds of a crisis. Though some people suggested taking a more active policy against Germany, their suggestions were unfortunately not accepted by the government. In late 1915, the Peking government secretly contacted the Entente nations, but pulled because of Japan’s objections. The turning point came in 1917. Diplomats, politicians, military leaders and all social circles were involved in debates over the question of whether China should continue to maintain neutrality or break off relations with Germany and declare war. Generally speaking, the forces in favor of breaking off relations with Germany were greater than those that advocated maintaining neutrality. The Peking government not only hoped that participation in the war would gain the future benefit of having the right to participate in the post-war settlement, it also hoped to gain benefits in the present, such as delayed payment of the Boxer indemnity, increased tariffs, and so on. Using participation into the war as a bargaining chip, the Peking government undertook intense negotiations with the Entente nations, and the Entente partially met China’s demands. We can say that joining the war was a mark of China’s diplomatic policies changing from passivity to activity. It was the start of the active diplomacy of the Peking government in its later period.

The Nationalist Government’s Efforts to Recover Chinese Sovereignty over the Islands in the South China Sea after the End of World War II

A Historical Account of the Chinese Marine Group Close to China Sea

Gulf of Tonkin Demarcation Negotiations and their Implications for Remaining Maritime Disputes

On the Sino-Japanese Controversy Over the Sovereignty of Diao-yu Isand

A historical investigation into Japan's expansion in the Nansha Islands in the first half of the 20th century

‘Winning the Peace’: The Chinese Maritime Customs Service, foreign technocrats, and planning the rehabilitation of post-war China, 1943–1945

Understanding sovereignty through meteorology: China, Japan, and the dispute over the Qingdao Observatory, 1918-1931

Great Power Consciousness and Action:China's International Position and Diplomatic Efforts in the Later Stage of the War of Resistance against Japan

Inside the Asian Cold War Intrigues: Revisiting the Taiwan Strait Crises

Interpreting Obama Administration's South China Sea Policy

The anti-piracy activities of the Nguyen Dynasty in the South China Sea, 1802–1858

Chiang Kai-shek and Vietnam’s post-World War II status

The Latest Developments of the Us Freedom of Navigation Programs in the South China Sea: Deregulation or Re-Balance?

Status Quo and Lack of Dispute on South-sea Sovereignty between China and the Philippines in the Eye of International Law

China’s rights and interests in the South China Sea: challenges and policy responses

On the South China Sea Disputes in the Conflict of Sino-US Sea Power in the Post-Cold War Era

Strategic assessment of the Nansha Islands occupied by Viet-nam based on AHP-variation coefficient method

The strategic position of Spratly Islands: An evaluation based on the field spread model

Re-examination of the Peking Government’s Participation in World War Ⅰ

Joint Development in the South China Sea: China’s Incentives and Policy Choices

The Nationalist Government's Responses to the Changing European Situation: Chinese Diplomacy around the Outbreak of World War Ⅱ