Re-examination of the Peking Government’s Participation in World War Ⅰ

Wang Jianlang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-6708.2005.04.001

2005-01-01

Abstract:Past studies of China’s participation in World War Ⅰ have mainly focused on the conflicts between the government and the parliament, between various cliques, and between South and North, and have mainly been critical of joining the war. It is necessary to explore the problem from the angle of diplomatic history. At the beginning of the European war, the Peking government declared a policy of neutrality. The policy seems appropriate at first glance, but in the special situation faced by China at the time, it contained the seeds of a crisis. Though some people suggested taking a more active policy against Germany, their suggestions were unfortunately not accepted by the government. In late 1915, the Peking government secretly contacted the Entente nations, but pulled because of Japan’s objections. The turning point came in 1917. Diplomats, politicians, military leaders and all social circles were involved in debates over the question of whether China should continue to maintain neutrality or break off relations with Germany and declare war. Generally speaking, the forces in favor of breaking off relations with Germany were greater than those that advocated maintaining neutrality. The Peking government not only hoped that participation in the war would gain the future benefit of having the right to participate in the post-war settlement, it also hoped to gain benefits in the present, such as delayed payment of the Boxer indemnity, increased tariffs, and so on. Using participation into the war as a bargaining chip, the Peking government undertook intense negotiations with the Entente nations, and the Entente partially met China’s demands. We can say that joining the war was a mark of China’s diplomatic policies changing from passivity to activity. It was the start of the active diplomacy of the Peking government in its later period.