Abstract:Background: Outcome measures that are count variables with excessive zeros are common in health behaviors research. Examples include the number of standard drinks consumed or alcohol‐related problems experienced over time. There is a lack of empirical data about the relative performance of prevailing statistical models for assessing the efficacy of interventions when outcomes are zero‐inflated, particularly compared with recently developed marginalized count regression approaches for such data. Methods: The current simulation study examined five commonly used approaches for analyzing count outcomes, including two linear models (with outcomes on raw and log‐transformed scales, respectively) and three prevailing count distribution‐based models (ie, Poisson, negative binomial, and zero‐inflated Poisson (ZIP) models). We also considered the marginalized zero‐inflated Poisson (MZIP) model, a novel alternative that estimates the overall effects on the population mean while adjusting for zero‐inflation. Motivated by alcohol misuse prevention trials, extensive simulations were conducted to evaluate and compare the statistical power and Type I error rate of the statistical models and approaches across data conditions that varied in sample size (N=100 to 500), zero rate (0.2 to 0.8), and intervention effect sizes. Results: Under zero‐inflation, the Poisson model failed to control the Type I error rate, resulting in higher than expected false positive results. When the intervention effects on the zero (vs. non‐zero) and count parts were in the same direction, the MZIP model had the highest statistical power, followed by the linear model with outcomes on the raw scale, negative binomial model, and ZIP model. The performance of the linear model with a log‐transformed outcome variable was unsatisfactory. Conclusions: The MZIP model demonstrated better statistical properties in detecting true intervention effects and controlling false positive results for zero‐inflated count outcomes. This MZIP model may serve as an appealing analytical approach to evaluating overall intervention effects in studies with count outcomes marked by excessive zeros.

Statistical Inference for Zero-and-one-inflated Poisson Models

A Zero-and-one Inflated Poisson Model and Its Application

Zero-and-one-inflated Poisson Regression Model

Multivariate Zero-and-one Inflated Poisson Model with Applications.

Zero-inflated Poisson Models with Censored Data and Its Application

Modeling Time Series of Count with Excess Zeros and Ones Based on INAR(1) Model with Zero-and-one Inflated Poisson Innovations.

Communication-efficient Distributed Statistical Inference on Zero-Inflated Poisson Models

Outlier Identification and Robust Parameter Estimation in A Zero-Inflated Poisson Model

Bayesian Zero-Inflated Generalized Poisson Regression Model: Estimation and Case Influence Diagnostics

Zero-Inflated Poisson Model with Group Data

Generalized partially linear single‐index model for zero‐inflated count data

A new multivariate zero-adjusted Poisson model with applications to biomedicine

Zero-inflated Loss Count Models and Their Applications

The Zero-Inflated Poisson - Probit regression model: a new model for count data

Zero to k Inflated Poisson Regression Models with Applications

Bayesian Inference for Zero-and-one-inflated Geometric Distribution Regression Model Using Pólya-Gamma Latent Variables

Zero truncated Poisson model: an alternative approach for analyzing count data with excess zeros

A simulation study of the performance of statistical models for count outcomes with excessive zeros

A Flexible Zero-Inflated Poisson-Gamma model with application to microbiome read counts

Score Tests for Zero-Inflated Double Poisson Regression Models

On performance of parametric and distribution‐free models for zero‐inflated and over‐dispersed count responses