Abstract:Background: Outcome measures that are count variables with excessive zeros are common in health behaviors research. Examples include the number of standard drinks consumed or alcohol‐related problems experienced over time. There is a lack of empirical data about the relative performance of prevailing statistical models for assessing the efficacy of interventions when outcomes are zero‐inflated, particularly compared with recently developed marginalized count regression approaches for such data. Methods: The current simulation study examined five commonly used approaches for analyzing count outcomes, including two linear models (with outcomes on raw and log‐transformed scales, respectively) and three prevailing count distribution‐based models (ie, Poisson, negative binomial, and zero‐inflated Poisson (ZIP) models). We also considered the marginalized zero‐inflated Poisson (MZIP) model, a novel alternative that estimates the overall effects on the population mean while adjusting for zero‐inflation. Motivated by alcohol misuse prevention trials, extensive simulations were conducted to evaluate and compare the statistical power and Type I error rate of the statistical models and approaches across data conditions that varied in sample size (N=100 to 500), zero rate (0.2 to 0.8), and intervention effect sizes. Results: Under zero‐inflation, the Poisson model failed to control the Type I error rate, resulting in higher than expected false positive results. When the intervention effects on the zero (vs. non‐zero) and count parts were in the same direction, the MZIP model had the highest statistical power, followed by the linear model with outcomes on the raw scale, negative binomial model, and ZIP model. The performance of the linear model with a log‐transformed outcome variable was unsatisfactory. Conclusions: The MZIP model demonstrated better statistical properties in detecting true intervention effects and controlling false positive results for zero‐inflated count outcomes. This MZIP model may serve as an appealing analytical approach to evaluating overall intervention effects in studies with count outcomes marked by excessive zeros.

Zero-Inflated Poisson Model with Group Data

Zero-inflated Poisson Models with Censored Data and Its Application

Zero truncated Poisson model: an alternative approach for analyzing count data with excess zeros

A Zero-Inflated Ordered Probit Model, with an Application to Modelling Tobacco Consumption

Random Effects Modeling and the Zero-Inflated Poisson Distribution

The Zero-Inflated Poisson - Probit regression model: a new model for count data

On performance of parametric and distribution‐free models for zero‐inflated and over‐dispersed count responses

Semiparametric analysis of longitudinal zero-inflated count data

A simulation study of the performance of statistical models for count outcomes with excessive zeros

Parameter Estimations on Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Model with Incomplete Data

Modeling Zero-inflated Count Data Using Generalized Poisson and Ordinal Logistic Regression Models in Medical Research

Zero to k Inflated Poisson Regression Models with Applications

Variable selection approach for zero-inflated count data via adaptive lasso

A Flexible Zero-Inflated Poisson-Gamma model with application to microbiome read counts

Detecting overdispersion in count data: A zero-inflated Poisson regression analysis

Multilevel modeling in single-case studies with zero-inflated and overdispersed count data

The Zero-inflated Negative Binomial-Exponential Distribution and Its Application

A New Zero–Inflated Regression Model with Applications to Australian Health Survey and Biochemistry Graduate Students Data

Statistical model for overdispersed count outcome with many zeros: an approach for direct marginal inference

Predicting the multivariate zero‐inflated counts: A novel model averaging method under Pearson loss

Too many zeros and/or highly skewed? A tutorial on modelling health behaviour as count data with Poisson and negative binomial regression