Order As Quality Mystique? How Category Order Affects Status Mobility in Venture Capital Industry

Danyang Li,Delin Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2017.15510abstract
2017-01-01
Abstract:Extant research in organizational and economic sociology posits that organizations derive status from their prior demonstrations of quality, as well as their affiliations with high-status alters. Yet there are also indications that organizations may acquire status by compiling across salient social categories. To discriminate between more or less successful category spanners, we suggest the order of accumulated categories matters, because it serves as an indicator of commitment when audience assessing quality. This paper theorizes the category order and test whether it influences the mobility of organization status. More concretely, we measure the concept of erraticism and test whether it affects the status mobility of firms in Chinese venture capital (VC) industry between 2006 and 2012. Results of the empirical analyses indicate that VC firms would enhance their status position by showing less erraticism and moving incrementally between similar categories other than highly erratic category histories, supporting the argument that category order acts as well a mystique for quality that explains the organization status dynamics. Furthermore, this relationship is stronger for earlier- stage, less experienced VC firms.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?