Abstract:Corporate venture capital(CVC) investments are direct or indirect minority equity investment made by established firms(corporate investors) in external privately held entrepreneurial ventures(portfolio companies).CVC investments are recognized as a source of firm value,which may relate to their attractiveness as multi-choice platforms from which to pursue strategic benefits.Accordingly,growing attention has been given in the academic literature to CVC activities in USA,sometimes as a distinct dimension of corporate entrepreneurship.The literature has so far focused on either the standalone,individual effect of CVC investments or the impact of total amount of CVC investments on corporate investors' performance.An important but as yet unexplored question is the relationship of the industry diversification profile of the portfolio of venture companies to corporate value creation.Furthermore,the programs structure,investments channels,investments models and practices of CVC activities between USA and China has significant differences.The conclusions derive of America does not necessarily fit China's CVC activities.However,partly because China does not have related databases,which is essential to researchers,China scholars hardly take the final investee,the entrepreneurial ventures into consideration.This is an important gap in the literature.In this paper,we take all three parties involving CVC activities(corporate investors,CVC program,and the entrepreneurial enterprises) into the whole framework and invoke a multiple real options theory framework to investigate this topic,focusing on CVC portfolio diversification and its influence on corporate investor value creation and the moderating effects of organizational slack on their relationship.Our empirical analysis dataset is based on evaluating the firm value created by listed companies in the Shanghai and Shenzhen motherboards corporate investors between 2000 and 2012 which includes 77 firms and 670 firmyear observations.We used generalized unbalanced panel-data linear regression fixed effects and random effects models to examine the relationships between a corporate investor's value(measured by Tobin's Q) and its CVC portfolio diversification(measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index,HHI) as well as the potential moderating effects of the corporate investor's organizational slack(measured by half the sum of current ratios and debt-to-equity).Empirical results shows that,the diversification of a corporate investor's portfolio of venture companies is related to corporate value creation in a U-shaped relationship and the U-shaped relationship is positively moderated by the corporate investor's organizational slack.The finding of the U-shaped relationship not only contributes to the understanding of strategic benefits of CVC activity at the portfolio level,but also advances the knowledge regarding the impact of diversification on performance.In addition,we find that a corporate investor's organizational slack positively moderate the U-shaped relationship.The findings from our results may have significant practical implications to CVC investment decisions as well as prompting strategic managers who are considering future CVC investments to take into account the impact of organizational slack in a positive way.More specifically,our findings may help to shape the pattern of how CVC programs invest and suggest that incumbents need to be mindful of their diversification strategy at the same time maintain appropriate available slack and potential slack.

Do Better-Networked Venture Capital Firms Always Enjoy Higher Investment Performance? the Contingent Role of China’s Institutional Changes

An Empirical Study on Investment Stage Selection of Chinese Venture Capital Institutions and Its Performance Effects

Do Venture Capitalists Play A Monitoring Role in an Emerging Market? Evidence from the Pay-Performance Relationship of Chinese Entrepreneurial Firms

When Do Social Network Ties Produce Value: Evidence from VC Industry in China

Striving to improve investment efficiency among Chinese firms: does the role of venture capital matter?

Does Venture Capital Spur Innovation or the Other Way Around? Evidence on the Significance of Investment Timing from China

Corporate Venture Capital Portfolio Diversification and Firm Value: The Moderating Effect of Organizational Slack

Social capital at venture capital firms and their financial performance: Evidence from China

Corporate Venture Capital and Firm Technology Innovation: the Moderating Effect of Absorptive Capacity, Involvement Intensity and CVC Program Government Structure

Venture Capital Network and the M&A Performance of Listed Companies

Effects of syndication network on specialisation and performance of venture capital firms

Why Do Chinese Venture Capitals Invest Jointly? an Analysis of Complex Investment Network

The evolution of k-shell in syndication networks reveals financial performance of venture capital institutions

Past performance and corporate venture capital:The moderating effect of top management's political networking

Returns on Chinese Venture Capital Investment and Its Determinants

The Effects of Government Venture Capital: New Evidence from China Based on a Two-Sided Matching Structural Model

Does Venture Capital Reputation Contribute to Pre-IPO Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms in the Chinese Context?

Syndication Through Social Embeddedness: A Comparison of Foreign, Private and State-Owned Venture Capital (VC) Firms

The Effect of Venture Capital on the Performance of IPO Companies

Social Embeddedness: A Comparison of Foreign and State-owned Venture Capital Firms

Venture Capital Syndication Network Structure of Public Companies: Robustness and Dynamic Evolution, China