Funding Ventures Similar to One of Us: How Status Dynamics Within Heterogeneous Groups Affect Venture Evaluation

Xirong (Subrina) Shen,Heeyon Kim,Jizhen Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3400
IF: 8.3
2022-01-01
Strategic Management Journal
Abstract:Research Summary We examine how status dynamics in heterogeneous evaluator groups affect the evaluation of a target venture where some evaluators resemble the venture team while some do not. Using data from a funding competition in China, we theorize and empirically show that the emergence of a status hierarchy among evaluator group members based on top-university affiliation leads non-top-university members to favor top-university venture teams by (a) increasing the visibility and positive value of top-university affiliation as a quality signal and (b) suppressing challenging questions directed at top-university teams. By introducing small group status dynamics as an explanation for similarity bias in venture evaluation, we contribute to the literature on resource mobilization in early-stage entrepreneurship. Managerial Summary Despite the wide use of heterogeneous teams in venture evaluation, similarity bias-a preference for venture teams that resemble the members of an evaluation group-is still prevalent. This study shows that, under certain conditions, heterogeneous evaluation teams might not be a solution for similarity bias. We identify a group-level source of similarity bias-the emergence of a status hierarchy among evaluators based on affiliation with top universities-which makes top-university affiliation a more salient and positive quality signal in venture evaluation, particularly for evaluators who are not affiliated with top universities.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?